Jump to content

agrof

Eurobricks Counts
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,941

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by agrof

  1. agrof
    I tried it, added the solution like that (though there is still a tiny gap inbetween the parts). The U-joints are still in perfect conditions, no cracks, nothing. Also I reduced the gear ratio, not with clutch gear, as it did not work at all. It is replaced to the normal 24 teeth gear. Now it can crawl at least, don't judge the rear axle and suspension, it is just temporarly.
  2. agrof
    Nice MOC, the best part is the side support wheel, great idea!
  3. agrof
    Here is the WIP lxf file, including both versions. Thanks for the help! I am now confused, built it back, and it still looks like the U-joints make the slip. I need to disassemble to check them properly. I might change the concept to gear it up for bashing, but crawling would be better. EDIT: deleted LXF as it was temporarly file.
  4. agrof
    I disassembled, and changed to differential. I learnt the next: U-joints were not harmed at all (they can crack at axle joints, and in extreme conditions they jump on axle) With differential it is even worse, the 20 teeth gears slip on differential housing, unfortunately there is still enough space for part deformation. According above experiences, I guess the locked version slips as well within the bracket, as I saw the gears rotating. I have no idea, what official solution could help, for now I settle with the locked one - as below:
  5. agrof
    Oh, well, that's it! I knew it is worth to throw the problems here. I will test it for sure. Meanwhile I had to investigate the electric system and replace the battery of my ZRX, but now I am back to LEGO. The modules come nicely together, till now I only had to change very little, and add some parts for sake of easier buildability. To be tested: gear ratios, locked diff, or open ones, body color. EDIT: it is alive, on low batteries... and clicking in the front... I have no clue, everything is bracketed. EDIT 2: I think the U-joints are not up to the forces. So, I need to test the open diff version, just for sake of saving parts... Or should I keep it as it is, and just replace broken parts? Which hand to bite? I think I will release both, and everyone can pick.
  6. agrof
    And still not robust enough, I made bracket for the steering rack in every direction (I tought), still it can click over by 1 tooth... I assume, the gear rack itself can bend a bit and let the servo gear slip. As I am building the "locked diff" version, I figured out a way to support from underneath, unfortunately it does not work with the normal diffs so I might not publish that version. As it should be a hardcore crawler at the end of the day, I don't mind it.
  7. agrof
    Prettty crazy model, good job, crisp pictures!
  8. agrof
    Front axle modul is almost finished. So far so good, as planned, but pretty dense, buildable, but tiny fingers needed.
  9. agrof
    Indeed, LDD allows that, I did not try it all the way, but I see some impact around the perimeter... unfortunately I don't have the parts to test.
  10. agrof
    Update: all the parts arrived! Just made a quick test, the 24x43 tires sit pretty well on 56908 wheels, they have maybe sligtly lower friction, than the 81,6 tires - if not the same. It differs a bit for each, as the old tires are... well, old. I don't believe, that during normal LEGO crawling conditions they will fall off or rotate critically. And the main thing: they do look badass. https://bricksafe.com/files/agrof/ultra-4-buggy/24x43 tyre 56908 wheel.jpg/1280x672.jpg p.s.: Tomorrow I am on holiday, so some progress is planned!
  11. agrof
    I don't think the usage of that part is reasonable in technic system like described. Just made a quick test in LDD, You will have uneven offset match, does not fit nor in 1/2 stud nor in 1 stud as usual. I recommend to use 27940 or 87082 instead. Here you can check, it is placed right that deep as just possible. It creates a rather odd offset:
  12. agrof
    I see now, it will be a hands-on model! This is great, and also then You have the opportunity (in case), to implement a badass V8 fake engine in the trunk. I know it makes the chassis more challenging, but this is the point.
  13. agrof
    It is a properly done replica of a properly ugly vehicle - so I like it! The front suspension is just great, would be interesting to see in action on rough terrain.
  14. agrof
    Glad to hear to have your problem solved! It is trully the most advanced and iconic set from official Technic up-to-date, enjoy it!
  15. agrof
    Looks pretty well for a C-modell, waiting for the video!
  16. agrof
    I would say, keep the body color as it is, looks funky! I like it so far very much, these wheels are my favorite ones, the rim covers add more visual play. Just add the electrics, and follow this direction, without ruining the proportions, than You are fine. Da Funky Monster! @I_Igor: those are 68.8x40 tires. (2996+2995)
  17. agrof
    @I_Igor Now You bring as example one of the sexiest thing in car history. That Ferrari IS an icon in industrial design, the new McLaren is still an eye-disease (though most probably very functional). Holes and gaps will be always there in LEGO given the system limitations, and I think this is the reason for the practice: usually not car manufacturers copy LEGO car designs, but the opposite.
  18. agrof
    This is no excuse for McLaren... And for the second part of the sentence, yes it can be done:
  19. agrof
    Just saw yesterday this new McLaren... well, might be the ugliest design they ever made. I am just happy if not this will be the next Technic supercar - which could be finally some off-road car: Mercedes G-class, Ford F-150, etc...
  20. agrof
    I hope we will see designer videos in this year later, what I saw till now... well no better word: lame. No passion, no dynamics, feels very mannered.
  21. agrof
    I added real rollcage, for sake of stability, the main parts are made of liftarms. The magenta colored 12M axle should prove, that everything aligned - which is actually 99% true, but as LDD approved it, I consider it legal. It extends the roof line well, so I might keep it. Can't wait for parts arrival, fingers crossed that not much must be redesigned, and I considered all directional structural stability.
  22. agrof
    I believe You can easily drive the current HOG upwards with light modification, so your planned trailer will fit perfectly. There is always a way.
  23. agrof
    Cool video again, pity that there was not enough space to gather more speed for the jumps though. This starter solution is great if you are the cameraman and the "driver" in one person.
  24. agrof
    I disagree, there is enough place for a hand (see below), and also it is a reasonable compromise not to destroy the look with a sticking out control knob on the smooth roof. Don't forget, it is a licensed model, where overall appearance is a very strong constraint. Steering solutions therefore must be more hidden, think for: 42043, 42053, 42054 and now 42078, not to mention the Porsche.
  25. agrof
    A while ago, @Didumos69 made a clever patch for the rear swingarms. With this MOD, the inner hinge parts (yellow connector #1) can not disconnect. I applied it (~ 10 minutes build), and I am very satisfied with the result! Thanks Didumos!
×
×
  • Create New...