TheNextLegoDesinger
-
Posts
526 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by TheNextLegoDesinger
-
looks great, i guess those grey studded block are supposed to be AAA battery boxes? -
there is only one thing I want from the new PF, a BT reciever
-
+1
-
yeah thats probraly rught, still not an original photo, probrally because it's much easier that way
-
just search lego 42083 and you wil instantly get the video
-
you need to have at least 10 posts, after that you are allowed
-
yeah stupid me :) looks nice, maybe i'll buy this set if i manage to get some money as it's gonna be an expensive year, by wallet
-
as always nicely and highly informative review. had to wind back sometimes as the text was changing to fast. Thnx
-
very interesting, clever way to use those studded frames
-
nice picture of the BMW, i really like it, if LTG would use such pics for there advertisements i think the boxes would look som much better. there is only one problem with the picture, THE BIKE IS TO CLEAN :D just kidding Greetz TNLD
-
PICS PICS PICS, i want pics. sorry, i haven't followed the 2018 discussion so i haven't seen pictures yet. anyone who can put some pictures?
-
i would opt for a solid front axle and an live rear axle, this way you have some suspention, and it will be pretty sturdy. this one has that type of rear axle i'm talking about. i don't know if your school has these parts. otherwise you could use a hinge system for your suspention
-
thnx for the info on the suspention, very clear explenation and a very clever desing. can't wait to see the end result
-
agreed
-
LXF file added to first post
-
+1
-
well, what you have there is a 1:106.688 ratio, so you might want to swap the XL for a L motor as you have 1546.98 N.cm. of torque with that XL motor, which might just be a little to much. with the L you get 691.34 N.cm.of torque Greetz, TNLD calculations:http://gears.sariel.pl/
-
just did a fast calculation and as i see you have a worm-8th thought combo twice this gives a 1:64 ratio if i'm right. i think the problem is overstress, using a XL motor you get an output of 928 N.cm , you might be better to use an m motor, here you'll get 232.32 N.cm of toque and twice the speed. or you could use a L motor, giving 414.72 N.cm of torque and the same speed as the m motor. this might just fix the cracking
-
thnx, yeah maybe i should call it different, ideas? thnx that phot was not easy to make, taking everything i got uot of my motorola moto X4 smartphone, depth mode, then some overdone post processing, it's my best picture i've taken yet and i love it (it,s my background photo on my phone :D )
-
Well living in belgium, the winters are pretty wet
-
OK, now i get it, i thought about something climing a hill at 80°
-
thnx for the constructive feedback. i'll take it in account for my next one. this one wasn't purposibly build to be a baja truck i just wanted a thingie to drive around in my room, while having superb outdoor performance. As for the body, it's what i wanted to create, something minimalistic but just enough detail. yeah, i wanted that agreassive look, the front window is only 3 syuds tall so it gives that extra aggresive look. as for the research, noted down ;)
-
you might have misunderstand my point, i don't want him to be disqualified, i just thought it would be nicer if it would be mosly original
-
when you wrote smallest tank climber i expected something in the range of 15x15x5. maybe you should have called it smallest stair climber still very nice build
