Zerobricks

Awesome job, well done! Regarding cowling I think there might be some other connection point or such so they latch in/stay in the fender panel? Or is just their width holding them there?

Hi. Please check the original posting date of the model. The fox 8x8x8 V2 is better in more or less all the ways.

If it's such a failed model, why don't you show Lego and to us how to do it properly?

That's quite brilliant and you can light it up much easier!

I don't think weight is the limit. I built a 15 kg Go Card which can easily support and drive a 60kg person. It's all about redistribruting stress onto several bricks evenly. Heck if I had enough technic pieces and motors, I could probably build a 1:1 scale driveable vehicle, the biggest problem would be the wheel bearings and the wheels tehmslves, not the frame/chassis. Sorry for going off topic.

I would kindly ask you and any other member who have issus to send them to the support E-mail where we can track and resolve the issue. I don't think a public forum is a good place to resolve such issues.

That's a mistake, here's how it should be - it will be corrected. 4x PoweredUP outputs – Max continuous current per PU channel: 2 A – Max instantaneous current per PU channel: 3.5 A 2x Power Functions outputs – Max continuous current per PF channel: 4 A – Max instantaneous current per PF channel: 6 A – compatible with older 9V system motors (RC/Buggy motor) Max continuous power per PF channel: 48 W Max total power: over 100 W I can't say anything regarding delivery dates as of now.

Of course, if you check tech specs; PF ports support up to 4A continious current which is enough to drive several XL motor at once.

Of course the motor will work with 2.0 and 3.0. That's why the 3.0 has the PF plugs. 2.0 can drive one motor at full power and the 3.0 should be able to drive two of them at full power. Like I said before we are currently focused on 3.0 and we won't do any changes to the 2.0.

Yes, app will support all BW types, even different types at once in same profile.

We are working on an option like a linear time curve, which lets you set the time needed for a motor to reach the wanted power. This would be useful for controlled acceleration. Yes, we are currently working on this option, so that servos run natively of firmware with a standalone PID controller.

Currently we are focusing on BW 3.0, so there are no plans regarding BW 2.0 Yes, that's the idea and yes of course you can plug all in.

That tells a lot... For now the only advantage of XL seem to be the additional mounting points if you want to use it as a structural part.

Good question indeed. I wish there was an official site where the differences could be better explained, I rememeber the PF components had quite detailed tech. specs. The only difference I spotted in the Lego Shop description was the following: L motor: Perfect for higher-load tasks. XL motor: Maximum power for the most demanding needs. Maybe it's a good question for the next designer interview.

Guys, not sure if anyone noticed, but there's a DOWNLOAD button in the news article where you can download all the pics and vids: https://www.lego.com/cdn/cs/aboutus/assets/blt1a4768c1d9993712/Ferrari_488_GTE_Asset_Bundle.zip

I forgot this thread exists Here is an X16:

Glad to see it working. Maybe I'm gonna buy some of the valve blocks and try it myself.

I think you could double the force of the pneumatic rams using these blocks by applying both positive pressure and negative "suck" to the cylinders.

It's instantly recognizable and I like the fact it's in a dark grey color. Like others said a video and more detailed shots would be appreciated.

Your first photo doesn't work for me. I googled the original car for reference, I suggest you add it to the first post. Great use of the chain for the rotary engine, well done.

I think something big is coming up in H2.

I think there are two 7L ones.

Why are you using turntables instead of normal hubs at the rear axle?

As Igor said great wheel choice and best of luck

I'm currently looking at the most "HOT" topics on the forum and it's kind of sad to see the following trend: The 100 something parts 42116 Skid Steer loader which was designed and optimized to be as cheap and with minimum amount of parts has more replies and activity than the 3500+ parts MOC of the Mclaren Senna. I don't think this would be as prelavant some 10 years ago, it seems nowadays people respect MOCs less and concentrate way more on sets?