Jim

[HELP] Generic Building Help Topic

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, Leo12 said:

It’s not that I want it to rotate in one direction, I just want to make sure that the output can’t drive the input.

Is the input rotatind one way all the time or is ir reversable  ?
Can you post an image or a diagram of what you want to achieve ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Leo12 said:

...I need something that can only be driven one way...

I like it when I have something to occupy my mind :classic: So:

One input and one output.

Should not allow backdriving.

Any gearing up/down needed?

Does input/output need to rotate in both directions?

How much torque? (Would a linear clutch on the output be sufficient?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, ukbajadave said:

I like it when I have something to occupy my mind :classic: So:

One input and one output.

Should not allow backdriving.

Any gearing up/down needed?

Does input/output need to rotate in both directions?

How much torque? (Would a linear clutch on the output be sufficient?)

Yes, that’s what I’m looking for. Ideally it would have very little change in gear ratio, but definitely not too much gearing down(unlike a worm gear). Both sides should be able to rotate in both directions, and it needs to be fairly torque resistant. If it helps, I’m using it for a three speed differential gearbox. I need to make sure the axle from the differential can’t back drive when the driving ring is disengaged.

Edited by Leo12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

800x600.jpg

First attempt, Yellow is input, red is output. Turning yellow axle turns red axle freely. Forcing red axle results in skipping teeth between differential and tan 20z.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ukbajadave said:

800x600.jpg

First attempt, Yellow is input, red is output. Turning yellow axle turns red axle freely. Forcing red axle results in skipping teeth between differential and tan 20z.

I like this solution. Thanks for the help!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/17/2020 at 5:22 PM, ukbajadave said:

First attempt, Yellow is input, red is output. Turning yellow axle turns red axle freely. Forcing red axle results in skipping teeth between differential and tan 20z.

That's quite amazing.  I was going to reply that I thought it was impossible without a worm... :distressed:

Do you understand why it works?

Edited by aeh5040

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, aeh5040 said:

Do you understand why it works?

In a word no :classic:

I think when you drive the yellow input both diff outputs (black axle, red axle) turn in the same direction. When you turn the red axle the black wants to rotate in the opposite direction?

I'm not even sure it isn't some weird friction type thing. If someone else wants to build and confirm it works (or doesn't?)

My instinct is that a worm gear solution exists but I haven't found it yet. 

 

Edited by ukbajadave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it must involve friction somehow - even a worm does.  But it's very surprising.  I will indeed try building it (or a variant)...

Edited by aeh5040

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Help needed please with Linear Actuator geometry. Pictured below is what I have so far. The problem is that when the tipper is flat the LA is almost horizontal. When I start to tip the LA pushes the bed back before it starts to lift with a jerk. Is there an optimum spacing that gets me lots of range with a smoother motion? The less rebuilding needed the better :classic:

All comments gratefully received.

800x600.jpg

800x600.jpg

800x600.jpg

800x600.jpg

800x600.jpg

800x600.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Either lower the attachment point in the tractor or mount it higher on the dumpbed. One stud on either side makes a world of difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys! I am currently tinkering around the idea of building a mobile rescue crane with a lot of PU-functions. The real one has different steering modes, the three I want to replicate are the following:

Steering.png

 

In the Claas Xerion, they did this well with a sliding connector. With my intended axle width of 11, and way less space above the axles (and my intended suspension), it seem unlikely to fit in. Another solution is a gearbox, engaging the different axles and changing the angle according to gear ratio. This however will need to always return to a neutral point to engage the gears in the right manner. Also it will be a bit flimsy, since when in neutral, axles not engaged can move in whatever direction possible, not be fixed in place.

 Is there another solution for this?

Edited by Jundis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could try this (not tested just an idea).

https://bricksafe.com/files/MikeTwo9398/steering/Steering_option.jpg/800x450.jpg

50049595793_df2a418394_b.jpg

Servo 1: select steering mode

Servo 2: Both axles rotate in the same direction

Servo 3: Both axles rotate opposite

If no mode is selected with servo 1 then funny things might happen :pir_tong2:

 

Edited by MikeTwo9398
Added picture to flickr (don't know how to add pics from Bricksafe)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thx @MikeTwo9398

The thing is, this solution only powers 2 axles, I need 4. Also ideally, one motor should be steering and the other one steering mode (both are PU L-Motors). Also in your solution as you said, funny things happen as the wheels can go evry direction^^

My solution would rather be, that the first axle is directly coupled to the steering motor, then the same axle goes into the gearbox. The second axle only has to be selected for full steering (crab speed) or half steering (other modes). And so on for the other 2 axles. The locking in place is hard to do here... *stillthinking*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A possibility for 3 axles would be to have 1 servo control the front wheels, a second servo control the rear wheels, and the central axle controlled by a differential which connects both. That could then scale to 5 axles by averaging the front/rear and central axle for the 2nd and 4th axle. I'm not sure how you'd scale that for 4 axles - maybe use the 5 axle setup I sketched then omit the middle axle?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm for 5 axles (and even 4 axles), this would be problematic as the second and fourth have different angles in the steering modes. Maybe I drop the crab steer completely and just go for one or two modes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Jundis said:

Hmm for 5 axles (and even 4 axles), this would be problematic as the second and fourth have different angles in the steering modes. Maybe I drop the crab steer completely and just go for one or two modes.

I made a two mode steering in my Liebherr LTM11200. I explained how I did it in the original topic here on Eurobricks. However, you want to have three mode steering, the only way I see that happening is using a Control+ motor per axle and then hope that SBrick Pro gets released soon (or that LEGO comes with their own programming suite). With these motors (and the associated programming) you can get any steeringmode you want. Not very interesting from a mechanical point of view, but more like real-life vehicles in a way since these are also individually computer steered axles nowadays.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanx @suffocation  ! This so far is the best mechanism I have seen. I'll let it sink in and try if it will fit :-)

Different gear sizes with a selector will also work, although they different heights of gear racks are needed.

Others like this are just way to big to implement in my moc (and overcomplicated).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I'm wanting to start working on advanced Lego Technic builds, and am wondering where to start. I already have a reciever, controller, battery pack and a fair understanding of how cars and suspension work, and want to know 1. What is the best thing to start trying and learning about and 2. If I am mainly interested in making off road type rc vehicles to start, want to just buy power functions and am not really interested in buying the powered up powered parts, where is the best place to spend my first 200-250 USD on Technic parts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then buy lego rc motor and other necessary parts.

Bur remember, Lego never will be same as real rc car.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say, the best place to spend your money depends on the parts you need...
If you want some specific ones then use Bricklink, but depending on the part it might be expensive.
If you want some thecnic parts, you can check this store : https://www.ebay.co.uk/str/bagsobricks (there are some interesting parts pack)
If you have more time, and don't necessary want new/recent lego, I would suggest you to go in the bric a brac sale near you, it's definitely the cheapest way to buy lego.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, hawkwind said:

where is the best place to spend my first 200-250 USD on Technic parts?

Brickowl.com and for nice off road MOCs have a look at rebrickable.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/26/2020 at 5:50 PM, Jundis said:

Hi guys! I am currently tinkering around the idea of building a mobile rescue crane with a lot of PU-functions. The real one has different steering modes, the three I want to replicate are the following:

In the Claas Xerion, they did this well with a sliding connector. With my intended axle width of 11, and way less space above the axles (and my intended suspension), it seem unlikely to fit in. Another solution is a gearbox, engaging the different axles and changing the angle according to gear ratio. This however will need to always return to a neutral point to engage the gears in the right manner. Also it will be a bit flimsy, since when in neutral, axles not engaged can move in whatever direction possible, not be fixed in place.

 Is there another solution for this?

One solution is to control the first and last axle independently, and use a beam to interpolate the intermediate axles. Works like a charm on small models. On large models, probably needs a stronger way to do this.

0uvakcy.png

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Erik Leppen said:

One solution is to control the first and last axle independently, and use a beam to interpolate the intermediate axles. Works like a charm on small models. On large models, probably needs a stronger way to do this.

0uvakcy.png

 

That's simply genoius.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.