Jump to content

nerdsforprez

Eurobricks Dukes
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,073

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by nerdsforprez

  1. nerdsforprez
    Guilty as charged.
  2. nerdsforprez
    I am not a purist by any means. I think that it is possible to actually fit RC components into Lego builds. This project is almost done. WHen it is I will post how it drives. Sorry..... I don't know how to post videos anymore. it used to work just fine to click share on youtube and copy the link. But apparently not anymore. If any one knows how to fix this by all means.....
  3. nerdsforprez
    AAAhhhhhhhh!!!!!!! I have literally been commenting about this guy on this forum for months. No comments or follow-up. Shows what my opinion is worth Great Job Paul finding this guy and getting him the recognition he deserves.
  4. nerdsforprez
    I see from your site that the turnable is not for sale. Is that the same for the pneumatic cylinders? Not for sale?
  5. nerdsforprez
    I hear alot of talk about elongated cylinders or actuators. As cool as they all are, I never seem to hear brickmachine shop in any of the discussions. They are out of California USA and have excellent parts for heavy duty use. I am sure many have heard of this store, I just never see their name in any discussion about elongated actuators or pneumatics. But they should be, they have some cool actuators, pricey, but very large and powerful: http://www.bricklink.com/store.asp?p=Eezo
  6. nerdsforprez
    Great feedback. Everyone. I appreciate it. I need to take some time out and play with each option. I played with Mechabricks a little last night...... pretty cool; also loved the idea that it was online and not software....
  7. nerdsforprez
    I made a similar post earlier today in the LDD/LDraw forum, and got some good responses, but am afraid I am missing the most important input from Technic builders. I have not used software in the past, and am wondering if I am missing an important part of building. I think I can add to my builds if I attempt using software, and therefore I would like to get others opinions in what they like best. I don't really work alot in anything else but Technic.... so, other people out there, what are your preferences? I gather that LDD and LDraw are the most commonly used, but I know there is MCAD and others. What are people's preferences?
  8. nerdsforprez
    Hello All, First time poster to this specific area, longtime poster to the Technic genre..... Forgive me if there is already a post that answers my question, but I could not find one. I have never created anything in Lego with software. Always preferred to just work with the tangible blocks. However, now wondering if I am missing something and that Ldraw or LDD can help add something to my builds. Problem is, there appear to be so many programs out there.... which is the best? Which is the standard? What are the pros and cons of each system. I work primarily in Technic parts, so I don't know if one program is better than others for this genre. Is there a thread that describes all this stuff to beginners like myself? I also know there are other programs out there....just not sure which are the best. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
  9. nerdsforprez
    Not to distract from the original post, and surely not to submit that this is equal to or better than a UCS falcon, but there are alternatives to BLing a UCS MF. I purchased two 7965's, used a few of my own elements, and here is the result. @ nearly 3,000 pieces it is no UCS, but it is no 7965 either. Also, with pneumatic landing gear and full interior (with all the hoses, detailed hyperdrive, etc. that would make Han very happy) it adds stuff not found in a UCS model. The overall build was fairly easy.... just extended the dimensions of the 7965. Once you have the chassis, you are well on your way and you can add any details you want. In the photo below you can see how large it is compared to other models in my den (like the UCS B-wing). BLing a UCS falcon is loads of fun I am sure. But... there are alternatives. In my mind, this is funner and so much less expensive! mm....don't know why the video won't post correctly. ANyone?
  10. nerdsforprez
    Good points, but I think that its pretty well known that Technic wheel pulleys do not serve the purpose DrJB discusses. This technique has literally been around for over a decade for large cranes and we all know that it does not serve the purpose that a real crane does, but... the reason why we add it is because it personifies the real thing. In illustration. In illustration only. Much, much better and well known builders than myself have used this technique. A quick search on brickshelf will reveal its frequency. Top builders such as Erik Leppen. No one would call Erik out on using this....... some things go with out saying
  11. nerdsforprez
    Woah woah hold on there pro. If you actually take the time to consider the whole post, and that I actually use a video using a MODEL to demonstrate what I am discussing, you will see that what I am discussing IS all about looks. I am not discussing the authenticity of the build. MANY, many have used this exact method long before I, and no one argues the proper nature of it. Large cranes are one of the earliest large MOCs. Each of us already know of what you pretentously said in your post but we continue to use the methods because it LOOKS cool. Your response actually doesn't even have anything to do with the actual post. I was posting something that I find a real pain. I found a video to show how to make it easier. I did not create the post to argue what I was doing had any functional value. Seperate the signal from the noise my friend, the wheat from the chaff; see the forest among the trees. Perhaps before you try to impress us all with your physics/engineering acumen, show us that you can actually read
  12. nerdsforprez
    Anyone who has built a large crane understands that treading the string to additional pulleys (like below) increases lifting capacity, but it is a pain in the rear end to do. Playing around with my crane this weekend resulted in the string coming off the pulleys.....so I am re-threading. Pain. Big pain. However, I found a video that is helping me out. Using some putty and rubber bands helps. Fast forward to the end of the video to speed things up. approx. to the 7 minute mark
  13. nerdsforprez
    Welcome Chris! I am from SL! I currently live in Texas, but am making a trip to Utah this April. GL with your truck build. I am curious to see how it turns out. I also dabble with scale builds...... although focus more on the functionality than the scaling. Welcome to EBs! btw.... checked out your site... amazing. You should add it to your signature block.
  14. nerdsforprez
    Typically though, when you have large rims with smaller tire walls then you get decreased 4x4 performance. No matter the suspension, you will feel every bump, rock, etc., b/c there is simply no tire and air to absorb differences in terrain. In fact, some auto manufacters won't even sale 4x4's with large rim options. My wife and I recently went shopping for a Jeep Grand Cherokee but wanted the altitude version. We were denied b/c they said these vehicles were not available. They stated there is no reason to have a 4x4 vehicle with thin tires. You will damage the rims when you are off-roading. Although I have hence found out the Jeep does, in fact, sell the version you see in this post as a 4x4, the dealerships rationale was sound. Off-roading with large rims and small tires is not a fun nor recommended practice. The pictures in this post, fitting the said tires on the said rims seem to me to fit that profile. I would not recommned it. Perhaps if the vehicle were, say, like a truck or SUV but more like for city driving and showing, then perhaps (can anyone say Cadillac Escalade?), but for a "monster truck" I would not advise it.
  15. nerdsforprez
    I think its great. I love to see people branch out.
  16. nerdsforprez
    Perfect. It really is a great model to create. Looking @ the picture from the original post, the lime green one, the ground clearance is outrageous. It really stands out. I'll bet that will be a major focus on the redition of the real thing in your model.
  17. nerdsforprez
    Awesome job! but i had the same observation as darksheep. Not only is that axle really long, but unsupported. Too much torque on it and it may twist or pop right out?
  18. nerdsforprez
    In addition to Blakbird's comments, IMHO an introduction to Technic is incomplete without pneumatics. Unfortunately, no sets right now offer much in terms of pneumatics. The last set to give us a large dose of pneumatics was the 8110 Unimog. Although extinct (lol.....naw, just end of line), and high prices, you may be able to pick up one on the cheap used. If you have the money, this might be a good idea. or..... if you can wait 6 months or so, be sure to pick up the AROCs if you can. It will also have a large dose of pneumatics.
  19. nerdsforprez
    Don't know if this has been posted or not.... pages loading too slow. I did not see it but forgive me if it is already on here...... -- I give up. Don't know why it is not posting correct. Here is the URL.
  20. nerdsforprez
    Interesting.....good information. Thanks.
  21. nerdsforprez
    Very Very nice! Great job. Not too sure about the size difference between the front versus rear tires though. Is this something that exists in real life in real supercars? Seems like the rotational speed and subsequent inertia would throw the car's equalibrium off......
  22. nerdsforprez
    WHere did you get your avatar!?? Love it..... +10
  23. nerdsforprez
    I was devestrated when I came home from work one day to find my MF crashed to the floor. I got it rebuilt over last summer but redoing the pneumatic landing gear was a beast and didn't get done until recently. So.... I am done with my list... for now It is now back up on my wall... as it should be. With working pneumatic landing gear.
  24. nerdsforprez
    Yea, I know. Bummer. For some reason I thought that the B instructions might actually be offered in the set. To the LEGO site I go...........
  25. nerdsforprez
    I truly am saddened by this post. As I mentioned in the original post regarding the release of your book, those who are interested in our hobby should be not only willing but jumping to the front of the line to PAY for your books. Anyone who builds, let alone publishes their builds and those of others, can only imagine the amount of work that goes into your books and builds. I personally would be very sad if your work were to stop. I gladly will pay for any work you produce. I only hope that there is enough continued interest to keep your work, and the work of others alive and well. I agree also with what others have said. I think your books are to be experienced in tangible, paper copy. I have no problem doing away with electronic format. I am excited for your upcoming book and would even pay double the release-price for it. I think that hobbies are just important in life as work and other things. It is important to keep them alive and well. Best to you Sariel and please do not be dissuade by a few scoundrels when the majority are happy willing customers willing to pay for your work.
×
×
  • Create New...