-
Posts
1,015 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Philo
-
MLCad - adding map?
Philo replied to neonic's topic in Digital LEGO: Tools, Techniques, and Projects
... Or use a model editor with a good search engine such as LDCad... -
OTOH the connectivity files were using a documented file format, so it's still possible to add that. The other problem when using new parts is that the parts thumbnails must be generated. SR3Dbuilder was supposed to be able to create them, but I was never able to use that possibility (crash). Instead I used image created with LDView. ...but I haven't used it for years since LDCad does most(*) of the job much more reliably. (*): I still regret the automatic mechanical simulator of SR3D, even though it was quite buggy...
-
Adding custom parts to Stud.io
Philo replied to Redimus's topic in Digital LEGO: Tools, Techniques, and Projects
Thanks Sylvain! Turns out that movement depends on viewing direction, just as in LDCad. So if you look from front or side, q/w move up/down! -
Adding custom parts to Stud.io
Philo replied to Redimus's topic in Digital LEGO: Tools, Techniques, and Projects
It's possible to move or rotate parts with keyboard only? So far I couldn't succeed doing that (could only rotate 90°)... -
Contributing to the LDraw List
Philo replied to zeeverse's topic in Digital LEGO: Tools, Techniques, and Projects
You are supposed to post model at the end of this thread From time to time an admin updates the master index at the beginning of thread. You may also submit your model on LDraw forum https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-17.html for inclusion in LDraw official model repository -
261-1 - Bathroom (Homemaker) Download MPD (OMR compliant) Known errors: None. Done with LDCad 1.6b Rendered with Studio 2.0
- 2,234 replies
-
- LDraw
- Official sets
- (and 5 more)
-
8285 - Tow Truck (Technic 2016) (duplicate, but Kuperus model is no longer available) Download MPD (OMR compliant) Known errors: No stickers. Done with LDCad 1.6b Rendered with Studio 2.0
- 2,234 replies
-
- LDraw
- Official sets
- (and 5 more)
-
@Kendo, Yes, that should help...
-
Hi @Kendo, - What did you used to create the image? - What have you used to export the scene to Povray? TEXMAP FALLBACK (code) TEXMAP END is the LDraw code used by older LDraw programs that don't support texmap extension (eg. MLCad, or currently Studio). If you want to display a pattern with these older programs, fallback section must contain a colored geometry showing the pattern. As an exemple, see this sail: http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/36069ap01.dat that shows the texmap image with modern LDraw viewers, and a very rough pattern with older programs.
-
8002 - Destroyer Droid (Star Wars Technic) (triplicate, but with all correct parts: (1) and (2)) Download MPD (OMR compliant) Known errors: None. Done with LDCad 1.6b Rendered with Studio 2.0 This one was tough to model (and probably to build in physical world too...). If we ever get a LEGO mechanical simulator, the unfolding sequence (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiMF-ubjvjA) is going to be a challenge...
- 2,234 replies
-
- LDraw
- Official sets
- (and 5 more)
-
Adding prints to Studio 2.0
Philo replied to adwind's topic in Digital LEGO: Tools, Techniques, and Projects
I like that! I converted a simple file that failed previously: http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Philo/Decals/tail-overlap.svg. Now the problem is that there are lots of T-junctions that prevent easy further simplifications. I also tried to improve Sally svg (converting text and strokes to shapes) and indeed I was able to get a much better result: http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Philo/Decals/sally2a.dat Unfortunately I went further to get the missing elements properly converted, and now the result is no longer OK :( Here is the SVG: http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Philo/Decals/sally2-simple.svg (and I didn't kept the intermediate step...) -
8012 - Super Battle Droid (Star Wars Technic) (duplicate, but with all correct parts) Download MPD (OMR compliant) Known errors: None. Done with LDCad 1.6b Rendered with Studio 2.0
- 2,234 replies
-
- LDraw
- Official sets
- (and 5 more)
-
8001 - Battle Droid (Star Wars Technic) (duplicate) Download MPD (OMR compliant) Known errors: None. Done with LDCad 1.6b Rendered with Studio 2.0 8001 - Battle Droid - AT-ST (B-model) Download MPD (OMR compliant) Known errors: None. Done with LDCad 1.6b Rendered with Studio 2.0 An interesting B-model... Good usage of parts, same theme but very different from main model, looks good (OK, would be better in grey instead of tan!).
- 2,234 replies
-
- LDraw
- Official sets
- (and 5 more)
-
42092 - Rescue Helicopter (Technic 2019) Download MPD (OMR compliant) Known errors: No stickers. Done with LDCad 1.6b Rendered with Studio 2.0
- 2,234 replies
-
- LDraw
- Official sets
- (and 5 more)
-
10230 - Mini Modulars (duplicate) Download MPD (OMR compliant) Known errors: None. Done with LDCad 1.6b Rendered with Studio 2.0
- 2,234 replies
-
- LDraw
- Official sets
- (and 5 more)
-
[APP] BrickController2
Philo replied to imurvai's topic in LEGO Technic, Mindstorms, Model Team and Scale Modeling
I tried, nothing changed. OTOH as I said previously a lag between controller and smartphone seems improbable, since it works fine with Buwizz. OK, could be some kind of BT flood occuring only with Boost, perturbating normal link with controller, but...???- 1,310 replies
-
- sbrick
- game controller
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
[APP] BrickController2
Philo replied to imurvai's topic in LEGO Technic, Mindstorms, Model Team and Scale Modeling
Hi @imurvai, The first time I powered the hub with LEGO app, there was a firmware update, but I don't know how I could get a version number, and as I bought it on BL I don't know its story. Both of them. I shot a little video to show you the problem: Direct control from the smartphone works fine: This could imply a delay between the game controller and the smartphone, but since it works great with Buwizz setup I think this idea can be eliminated. ;) Otherwise, I like the app a lot. One little suggestion: during profile creation, it would be nice if, when you add a new event, the last device used was selected.- 1,310 replies
-
- sbrick
- game controller
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
[APP] BrickController2
Philo replied to imurvai's topic in LEGO Technic, Mindstorms, Model Team and Scale Modeling
Finally bought a game controller (PG9025), so I finally could try BC2! But I do have some problems (using Moto G5+)... - Worked wonderfully well with a Buwizz V1 - Overall, worked fine with 2 x Sbricks, though sometimes connexion didn't occur the first time. Also got some app crashes while trying to connect. - Connects fine with a Powered Up hub, but the motors never worked (neither in device test or with a creation profile). The hub and motors work fine using LEGO app. - Connexion to the Boost hub work only the second time. For example, in device test, the phone remains in "connecting mode", though the Boost Hub considers to be connected (blue LED). I press cancel and try again to connect, and then it works fine. The sliders of device test mode work fine with no lag. After that, I tried the creation mode. Here again, connexion occurs only the second time. Thent, it works, but with a LOT of lag. - No support of WeDo 2 ?- 1,310 replies
-
- sbrick
- game controller
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
Adding prints to Studio 2.0
Philo replied to adwind's topic in Digital LEGO: Tools, Techniques, and Projects
Ah - this explains. Studio doesn't know about scaling! It normalizes the transformation matrix. This is the same issue I faced here: https://forums.ldraw.org/thread-23006-post-29747.html#pid29747 -
Adding prints to Studio 2.0
Philo replied to adwind's topic in Digital LEGO: Tools, Techniques, and Projects
The good news is that Corel Draw allows me to easily convert strokes and text to "normal" fills... Yes, I noticed that. Indeed it's a problem, as stacked surfaces is not the proper way to do this - it causes artifacts if the plane are close enough - and otherwise the stack can get high... The problem I see with current approach is that it results in many, many more vertices than necessary. I can also see line artifacts, probably when the trapeziums are too narrow. Why do you see this as a problem? If needed neighboring triangles can be easily merged into quads... Sorry for that ;) - I'm not in a hurry anyway... Weird... can you share a file that shows the problem?