Jump to content

Zerobricks

Eurobricks Archdukes
  • Posts

    8,023
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Zerobricks

  1. Good question. I'd use the L motor for steering, though the front axle might need a bit of a redesign.
  2. I checked my parts from the Ferrari and they also show the same failure. I will demand replacment parts from Lego. Also I think a QA-related topic might be in order.
  3. How do you fail such a basic part and quality control? It's like those 20 tooth bewel gears all over again...
  4. Speed is controlled by the hub, not by the motor. The motor only has the absolute positioning sensor, but the regulation has to be done in the power supply.
  5. We plan to do the first test production and if all goes well start sending first products on the 16th.
  6. You want to remove the current protection or what?
  7. Exactly, that was one of the goals, more power for the motors and a higher precision with the PU system.
  8. BuWizz 3.0 can drive/read 4 PU/Boost/Spike, etc... devices and has 2PF ports to drive PF motors/Leds, etc... All the detailed info is in the tech specs: https://buwizz.com/tech-specs/
  9. This is the BuWizz motor thread. The motor should be shipped in April, yes.
  10. April, the mould is currently being produced.
  11. Thank you, interestingly it works normally on my PC, seems to be a mobile bug. We will lok into it.
  12. No, it's not, can you show me where exactly it states that?
  13. Was about to comment something in that manner, the Volvo and the 42070...or anything else that uses 2 or more diffs.
  14. No, 1x3 tile: https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=63864#T=C Held by 2 half-pins: https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=4274&name=Technic, Pin 1/2&category=[Technic, Pin]#T=C
  15. I know, I have the same parts at home. But still as a whole it's really hard to combine with other systems.
  16. I meant system, yes not Lego, bad choice of words on my part. But still there is nothing "Technic" about that model IMO and it seems like a very closed and limited system.
  17. I know about these, but I wouldn't consider the Outdoor Challenger (lime) as a proper Lego set, more like a modular RC car. It used totally different materials (softer bricks) building system, etc...
  18. Won't happen, cause than kids would complain when the bricks would inevitably break outside. You can't compare open plastic-only mechanical Lego assemblies with proper RC ones which have bearings, enclosed lubricated systems, etc... That's why almost every Lego RC model has indoor only usage smybol.
  19. Regarding axle slippage. A somple 1x3 tile held by 2 half pins covering the axle should do the job.
  20. That's what confuses me too. For example I built the 42125 and: Out of 27x 42003 (Connector Perpendicular 3L with 2 Pin Holes) 26 were black and one was light bluish gray which could easily be black Same set has #3 connector in red and light bluish gray color AND #4 connector in the light bluish gray, which are really easy to mix up - all #3 connectors could easily be red. 7L beam is in black and dark bluish gray, even though they could all be in black 15100 connectors are in black, red, light bluish gray with the last one being 4 pieces - again WHY? Why does the rear window use 6x 6632 (3L) levers instead of a simple black 9L beam which is alredy used 10 times? And many, many, many more weird cases from this set alone. ...and so many more cases where they could simplify the colors of the pieces, where basically all the pieces of the same shape are same color. It's very messy and I don't understand when they on one hand use color coding to differentiate pieces and on the other break their own rule as stated in the cases above.
×
×
  • Create New...