Jump to content

TeddytheSpoon

Eurobricks Counts
  • Posts

    1,014
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TeddytheSpoon

  1. Ten 1x1s probably would take a tiny bit more plastic than one 2x5; if you make enough of them then that difference does add up. The broader point around PPP still stands, though - in general, it's a reasonable metric to assess the value of a LEGO set, but it falls apart when sets have lots of smaller pieces (like the art sets) or big moulded pieces, where the higher cost of the mould will need to be offset by a higher price and therefore a worse ratio (in theory).
  2. This seems like an interesting topic and one that I've wondered myself a few times... I generally tend to start with "defining features" when working on a model, but the cockpit is normally next in line. Because minifigures are such awkward shapes, I find it's worth reserving the space for the level of detailing I want (normally a nice seat and control panels or levers, at least) and then working out how to incorporate that into a structurally sound build. For builds where the figure is more exposed, like a speeder or walker, I normally start with the pilot. That said I do most of my building digitally, so I'd be fascinated to see what others do.
  3. These are both great! Love the dish turret in particular, wouldn't mind a breakdown to be able to make my own...
  4. Well I was sceptical when I first saw it, but after reading it for the 11th time, colour me convinced! /s It seems like we have one of these daft May 4th fig rumours every year. Wasn't P2 rex a (completely unfounded, naturally) rumour for last year's one?
  5. A surprise, to be sure, but a welcome one! I love the latest iteration of the tank so happy to have had my scepticism proved wrong here. Still, it is a very strange choice of set. A clone legion that has only existed in the EU, released not only outside the usual release windows but also in no proximity to any CW-era material (that we know of)... TLG works in mysterious ways.
  6. That piece certainly seems to have been referenced by people like Falcon or Fulcrum (if not outright confirmed), so I'm a bit more inclined to think this one is legit, although I'd rather it weren't.
  7. That's interesting if it's true. Seeing as the set comes with a BD unit (which is, of course, a new mould), that would suggest the buildable BD unit and figure had been in development for a while. I assumed its appearance in TBoBF would be what tipped TLG over the edge to make one. On the other hand that does make the timing of that model really odd... J:FO came out three years ago, and even with the news of its sequel it's not exactly contemporary media as far as Star Wars goes.
  8. I'm not sold on this as a solution to force ghosts. Aside from the fact you can't really pose the figures, it also makes them look *enormous* because of the weird proportions that minifigures have. A dedicated figure would have worked much better, IMO.
  9. Love the idea for the suspension and steering (although they do look awfully clean, for kartcross!). Do they sag much, since it's only friction holding them up?
  10. I've often said that SC sets are the best place to see interesting parts usage and techniques at relatively affordable prices, and this seems to be no exception with the upside-down pieces. Interestingly the last one I remember seeing like this was the F40, also a Ferrari. Great review!
  11. Iconic ships in general, I would agree, but in terms of capital ships I'd say it's right up there, certainly in the OT era. There's the ISD, SSD, Tantive IV, and I'd argue the Nebbie is the next most recognisable (admittedly out of a small pool). Even including the PT I'd only place it behind the Radiant VII and a Venator. That said, I do think it's more likely to be around the 350 price mark. I'm leaning towards the 530 set being a death Star re-re-release, as I think that slightly odd price point roughly lines up with the inflation since the last one (which was 2016 IIRC?).
  12. While I do largely agree, it does seem (at least to us mere mortals) like some of it is arbitrary. The Tallneck that got revealed today has basically three times as many pieces as the N1, is also based on a licensed property with a new mould, and costs only $20 more. Of course it's a difficult comparison with things like the Lucasfilm tax, different amount of figures and possibly being the two extremes of perceived value for money, but I do think the N1 is one of the more egregious examples of LEGO inflation, alongside Grievous' Starfighter from 18 months ago.
  13. Yes! So glad to see Yoko Tsuno getting some love. The little fighter craft especially look great, love the technique for the wing offset. I started work on the big yellow Vinean shuttle for SHIPtember a couple of years back but never finished it... You've inspired me to have another go I think!
  14. I'd go for the Jaguar CX-75, I think - such a unique car. (OK, it was the baddie's car, but still...) I'm not sure how I feel about licences (other than automotive or Motorsport ones, of course) coming to SC. On the one hand it'll be cool to have a DB5 if they can pull it off, and for sure there are loads of cars from movies I'd like to see (Italian job chase, anyone?!). On the other hand, TLG are doing so much licensed content tying into movies and such these days... Do they really need to push that into SC as well?
  15. I have to say I've never played the game and the Tallneck is pretty much the only thing I recognise from it, but this set does look mighty tempting. It's a good representation of a cool design, the PPP ratio is good, there's enough going on to make it visually interesting... I was surprised when I heard the rumour but it looks phenomenal.
  16. Ehhh the N1 looks pretty rough IMO. The TPM ones mostly get the rough shape across, even if they're not terribly accurate. This looks a bit messy, Peli and the BD unit are the only saving grace here (and even the BD looks a bit tall). Without drum lacquer and at least a katana for the darksabre, for the price it does feel a bit phoned in.
  17. Was this not alleged to be one of the quotes sets? In any case I'd be surprised if it was a Kenobi set, seeing as the show doesn't come out until the 25th and I would imagine the May set would be to tie in with May the 4th. Stranger things have happened though.
  18. The build is great, and I love the concept of using the cube as a cockpit, but most of all I have to show my appreciation for this terrific pun
  19. I wouldn't say so necessarily, we still have the sequel coming out later and IMO the BD unit appearing in live action is LEGO's in to see how it sells. Their track record on bigger sets from video games hasn't been great of late though.
  20. The palace does look like better value with more pictures. Solid set, but still don't think I'll buy it
  21. I'm still not convinced we'll get sets for those. Maybe I need to wait for the trailers, but these seem to have flown pretty under the radar hype-wise compared to Mando and TBoBF, possibly as they are (presumably) separate from this new Favreau-verse. If the other sets are as good as this list though I won't complain. I wonder if this is TLG testing the waters a bit. Obviously BD-1 is well known to those who played Fallen Order, but after its appearance in TBoBF those who haven't played the game might recognise it as 'that cute droid that Pelli owns', so there's less risk involved. I can't imagine it not selling well though.
  22. I missed out on the last AotC Jedi Starfighter, and if it includes Taun We then that may well be a day one buy. Finally a Kaminoan! If the AT-TE and gunship predictions turn out to be correct then this could be an expensive summer...
  23. Promobricks did a tease on their Instagram story before releasing the info with a little Hunter helmet, so I assume it'll be based on the Bad Batch. This would be the perfect set to get Omega in; I do wonder what figures they'll include though. From memory that scene had Cad Bane, his little droid, Fennec, Omega and Hunter... Five minifigures doesn't seem like a lot in such a big set. Maybe we'd get the rest of the batch again?
  24. Well, we don't know that that isn't BD-1...
×
×
  • Create New...