Jump to content

Rudivdk

Eurobricks Counts
  • Posts

    1,137
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rudivdk

  1. I really think those are not the Sian fenders, but a rounded version of the slightly smaller 911 RSR fenders. The 1:10 wheels would drown in the Sian fenders, and that is clearly not the case here. And good to see that TLG is not printing the fenders, they listened to the 911 RSR feedback I guess. The rear fender extenders are a nice addition, cool for tuning/racing car MODs/MOCs.
  2. Looks to me like scaled down versions, same size as the 911RSR fenders but rounded. I think the rear end features some new wheel well extender part on the outside of the fender piece, looks like the perfect 'tuning' part. I really like this one, didn't expect too much of it but I'm quite impressed by it's looks. And in my favorite 1:10 scale again HYPED Edit: bonus points for TLG for not printing anything on the fenders!!!
  3. Great first MOC! Although I personally can't keep all the 1:8 scale MOCs of similar looking supercars apart anymore, one part on this MOC really stands out for me: those trans-red long shooter 'missiles' as rear lights are genius!! I haven't seen it used like this before, might have to 'borrow' that idea somewhere in the future
  4. Yeah I know, so technically it always 'steers' but there is no function like rotating the hubs to put the wheels in an angle compared to the main body. The b-model clearly has that, that was what I was referring to.
  5. @Maaboo35 that's good, but interesting at the same time. I'm curious what those pullbacks will have as B-model then... Did the monster trucks had their appearance changed over the years? A different detailing (perhaps stuff like bullbars etc.) is what comes to mind first. It would be weird to build an alternate with licensed stickers, or even weirder to have you remove the stickers for a B-model...
  6. Sorry, from now on I'll stick to building again...
  7. ...which is part of the general conception of the current world we live in. I understand and applaud the current market approach of TLG (they are doing a great job servicing the demand, we are getting loads of new sets and new pieces every year), but when I look at my kids for instance I see them approaching their Lego differently than I did when I was their age. They just want to build what's on the box and when they want something else they ask for a new set instead of rebuilding. And believe me I tried to make them use their existing parts for something new, but they don't have the patience for it it seems... Anyway, we're drifting off topic... back to 2021 sets...
  8. So we have only the hovercraft (small model) and digger (medium model) left as sets with a possible B-model (assuming the Ferrari has none). I doubt that the (licensed) pullbacks will have a B-model this time. Which totals the number of B-models to 4 (smallish), compared to 6 (larger) sets without... All hopes on Milan (Grohl) again... But seriously, as longtime, oldskool Lego builder it saddens me a bit to see the current demand is no longer asking for creativity... It is no surprise looking at the current state of the world around us, but still... I miss the old days: universal sets, ideas books, hints to multiple alternates on the backs of the boxes... -sigh-
  9. True, but at least the designer put in steering, a function not there on the A-model. That's the primary function of a B-model right, to inspire reusing the parts for something new. So I think for that the B-model deserves praise even though it has too little 'flesh' to look good.
  10. You sir have single-handedly made this set into a desirable one... nice wave of alternates, and extra kudos for making the models so different from each other. Some solutions and parts use is really inspirational! I guess now we only need a boat alternate to cover all major transportation vehicle categories...
  11. Something funny just hit me... this thread receives 8 pages of replies in just 10 days... Guess we like discussing more than building
  12. I'm a sucker for 1:10 cars, so seeing another one is always good. But, with all respect, I think this is not your best work. It is recognizable and as always very much detailed and finished, but I think the looks suffered from the color and scale used. And the subject matter itself doesn't help either... It looks a bit too much 'many panels wrapped around a chassis' instead of a fluidly flowing body imho. Probably in 1:8 you would have been able to capture the shapes much more accurately, given your skills and talent. But still, very impressive model, outstanding parts use (front grill, lights, exhausts, rims+tires) and way above my level of building
  13. You might forget that the top of the clip is permanently inserted into the ridge of the corresponding driving ring. So it can't rotate or fall off, it's pretty much formlocked... @Gray Gear nice and compact solution! Dunno how I missed this back in May... Functions-wise it reminds me of my own old gearbox with fixed h-pattern, although your version is even more fool proof locking the unused rings in neutral as well. And it seems yours is also easier to incorporate into a model.
  14. The more I look and think about that arm, the more intrigued I get... It sure is a nice choice, and a rather challenging project. One thing that comes to mind for me is if you could make the bucket LA operated too. It will probably end up slightly affected by the boom rotation, but it might be worth a try. You could use one of these to transfer the powering from the superstructure into the extending part of the boom. And since you have a turntable on both sides of the boom, you could also think about routing functions towards the boom from each side (extension, rotation, bucket movement and than there is even 1 possible function left, quick release mechanism for the tool maybe?...). Although all of this will probably blow the boom out of proportions... I'll be following this build!
  15. Wow, I've been reading through all the pages of this topic with increasing amazement... This discussion flies everywhere and back again... For me the reason of not posting MOCs or WIPs is plain and simple: I just don't have any at the moment. I have projects in my head, and builds laying around (some 99% finished) but life is taking too much toll on me at the moment to have any energy left to build or post about it. So I stick to rebuilding some old sets and MOCs, nothing much worth posting. To be honest, I do not really care about how many comments I get or don't get. I build and post for myself, and the fact that I post something that I think is worth sharing is enough for me. Sure, it's fun to get some response, but I can't really do much with 'likes' only. I'd rather get 1 constructive critique so I can improve. That's why I don't post anywhere outside EB. Guess I'm oldskool... Anyways, all above is just my personal opinion, and not meant to harass or attack anyone else...
  16. I think different... you have succeeded in making a whole, non-cluttered bodyshell which is coherent and pretty much in correct proportions all around. That's a big step. Don't underestimate the power of experience gained over this, next time you'll be able to go for that bit of extra flair in the bodywork. I'd recommend starting a new MOC instead of improving this one, you might end up deadlocked with your current build at some point because all the chassis hardpoints are pretty much set already. Unless you're willing to tweak your chassis as well of course... One trick I often use when designing (complex) bodywork shapes is making a 3d CAD model with all the bodywork pieces 'floating' where I envision them. This quickly gives you a good idea whether your ideas will actually work or not. Once that is done, I try to work out the proper mounting structure for those pieces 1 by 1, both digitally and with real bricks. It takes more than a handful of tries sometimes to get the proper angle for certain areas, but usually I end up with something pretty close to what I intended.
  17. +1 Looks like a very decent MOC, it is finished all around in a coherent way. Maybe not the prettiest of MOCs out there, but it has a very distinct own style. I'll choose this over yet another supercar replica every day. Would love to see a bot more of the insides though, I have a feeling that the prettiest part is hidden under those panels...
  18. On the other (invisible) end of that 6l red axle under the cabin you mean? I was thinking the same...
  19. Yeah in a few sets already (RTC, car transporter amongst others). Still not as common as black or bley though, good to see (again) a rarish part appear in the smallest set of the line-up.
  20. That looks really nice, and pretty close to the standard Lego colors! Gives you a valid excuse to use black parts wherever you don't have LBG or DBG The plane itself is turning into a real beast, I can't get over the size of it... I think it dwarfs my P38 (Quick count: over 100 studs in length? And width will be near equal I guess...?) Keep it up!
  21. Technic sets are getting more detailed with more smaller technic pieces. The Sian was already a telltale sign (loads of 21/22 panels in the front fascia), and this car confirms that. Seems TLG wants to really flesh out the model range in medium scale, and they are investing heavily in that. I can only applaud them for it The Jeep shows a similar level of detail with new small technic parts. At this point I really would like to get both the McLaren and the Jeep sets, and that shouldn't even cost me a fortune... Happy days All this gives me good hopes for a well detailed Ferrari car too...
  22. I like it. Looks detailed enough to be recognizable, without becoming cluttered in little (system)parts. And judging by the box picture, both axles are suspended. Looks like opposite wheels are oscillating around a center point only, so pendulum axles front and rear, but then it will probably have springs as well to balance the axles in 'neutral' position. Some new parts in yellow again (after all new panels on Volvo dumper), that is always good! And those new tires are promising, let's hope we see those more often in the near future.
  23. Really nice rat rod! I still plan on building a Technic rod one day, I will surely look at this for inspiration when I start! Also, cool detail adding that 'watch your step' genuine Lego sticker And do I spot a wheel hub cover as steering wheel inside?
  24. What pops to mind is some lever connected to the wings and activated by the sweep-motion that engages/disengages the spoiler control system at around 62°. Set 8052 has a mechanism which might be a useful starting point. But I think it will be really difficult to do that with acceptable (minimal) backlash... @captainmib: I really like your solution, because it is very easy to incorporate in any build. It is easy to change the black rods for longer 9l ones or even custom ones to increase the length between cockpit and wing inputs, and by changing the length of the red or yellow connectors you can even amplify or de-amplify (is that even a word...?) the movement from the control stick. Very nice @Void_S that suspension idea is also a very interesting concept, would love to tinker around with that some day...
×
×
  • Create New...