Jump to content

Jurss

Eurobricks Dukes
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,509

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Jurss

  1. Jurss
    That rear outriggers mechanism is genious.
  2. Jurss
    Stunning!
  3. Jurss
    Could be too small. Beach is not far from me, but today was really unstable weather, and don't know what tomarrow will be.
  4. Jurss
    22. Lime grader Functions: Blade height adjustment Blade tilt adjustment Blade rotation Blade movement, extension to sides Rear plough Front wheel steering with HOG Articulated steering with HOG Openable rear hood Fake driven engine Front swing axle Rear axles swinging on each side Dimensions 45x13x15 = 8775
  5. Jurss
    Changed littlebit cabin, made it one stud higher. It was not easy, as it was required to disassabmle pretty much, to move one 3L pin. For me it looks like really significant improvement, proportions for cabin is much better. Everything else is almost the same. During these changes, change littelbit upper connection between front and rear part. Picture with box Final dimensions are 45x13x15 = 8775
  6. Jurss
    Pretty OK so far. I need to tell, what bother me - engine needs to be at some angle, leaning down at the back. I did it in my smaller model, should be possible in this size.
  7. Jurss
    no
  8. Jurss
    OK, relly good looking parts pack :D
  9. Jurss
    Maybe make angle larger? Somehow looks really small angle.
  10. Jurss
    As there is extendable shaft, then it is not critical
  11. Jurss
    Also my first thought, as I just built BMW, and noticed, that it is really hard. For this it could be really too hard, as there is not so long lever as on BMW.
  12. Jurss
    That was fast. It is even better I think.
  13. Jurss
    I think yes. It was something around 7000 now.
  14. Jurss
    Didn't looked like that. If not mistaken, front is also wider than middle part. One stud extension is OK for the scale. So You scaled this car? But it doesn't look, that wheel size was used as reference. It should be something like this (but could be too heavy for pullback. At least one) I think, I could try to remake this, as I also have those new small wheelarches. But they could be too small.
  15. Jurss
    Not shure, if the cabin is not too small. In real it looks OK, but not exactly in this picture
  16. Jurss
    Good start. Are those shock absorbers used for gear switch?
  17. Jurss
    Like how this evolved really good way.
  18. Jurss
    For pullback this is really OK. For rear You could really extend wheelarches, so they cover better those wheels, as rear is wider than front on real one.
  19. Jurss
    One large box, panels mainly sorted by color in ziplock bags. I don't have really large collection.
  20. Jurss
    About model team it was not compliment. From rules "Some studded parts and panels are okay, but model team is not permitted." Front part is almost made of system parts, so it is not good for this contest. Rear also. It is not technic anymore. You could fill some gap, add some better line with some system brick. Yes, I understand, that roller it self is made from system parts. I suppose, that would be ok. Maybe I'm wrong. I'm just reading rules.
  21. Jurss
    Good start. But it really looks more like some model team build already.
  22. Jurss
    For me it also seems mechanically better option, as main axle will have 2x load. Electrically it is not critical. And yes, as mentioned, knob gears are not good option
  23. Jurss
    I'm pretty shure, that they are all the same. Size looks the same for both wheels, so, I assume, also rims are all the same.
  24. Jurss
    Your model in technic looks better than original (I somehow don't like Pagani design)
  25. Jurss
    If I understand correctly , instead of using standard 7L beam, You can use there 7L gear rack, and it would not collide at all. But I may be wrong, as I don't see all details.
×
×
  • Create New...