Jump to content

mostlytechnic

Eurobricks Dukes
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,179

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by mostlytechnic

  1. mostlytechnic
    I was torn on how to vote until I read this. Your second paragraph there is blatantly a lie, so I'm going to Vote: Dr James (tariq) I never once said that all the scum MUST be on the bandwagon. Never. In fact, I did the opposite of what you're accusing me of. People were saying that there MUST be scum NOT on the bandwagon. I argued that was a foolish assumption and that we can't ignore that all the scum COULD BE on the wagon. Never did I say that they were or that I was certain or any such thing. You're putting words in my mouth and flat lying. And then trying to say you're on the border of voting for me because of it.
  2. mostlytechnic
    At first, I was going to ARGUE and YELL (DARN IT!) about how you lumped Moore and me together, since I didn't remember him making the same argument as me. But then I went back and read (man, aren't unredacted transcripts a useful thing?) his statement again and I see it. Have to say, bob, I agree with Wilson. Yes, you've stated your position before, but amongst all the debate here, it's hard to remember. I'd appreciate a little reminder of why you wanna lynch someone when you say it. Saves me looking through pages and pages of discussion.
  3. mostlytechnic
    I agree, NORMALLY they would not. In this case, I'm saying don't rule it out since it was such an unusual situation. To me, it was similar to when there's an investigator report on someone. Everyone jumps on that vote wagon. Obviously that's a little different since it's a scum getting lynched, but it's a similar situation in that it was 100% obvious who was getting lynched, so zero reason for the scum to vote anywhere else. Second, check your math. As I explained above, NINE of us 12 were on the Lewis wagon. THREE were not. And I was scum, I wouldn't be arguing this point since I also said moles are on the wagon, which is where my vote is, so I'd be calling attention to myself.
  4. mostlytechnic
    Yes, they do, UNLESS the wagon is big enough to hide in so easily and so safely. I'm not ignoring the possibility that one of the 3 off-wagon votes is a mole. I am in fact trying to INCREASE discussion - since there were multiple people saying "there MUST be a mole off the wagon!!%#$!" and that's simply not true. Odds are, that all the moles are on the wagon. This I agree with - the last hour sucked and turned into a near waste of a day (and 2 CTU lives).
  5. mostlytechnic
    Why? Why do people keep saying this? Why wouldn't the moles pile on the sure thing, where they'd get zero criticism when Lewis flipped town? Let's look at the numbers. Here's the vote tally: I marked our two dead CTU members in green so we can easily ignore them for now. If we look at the rest, there's 3 votes on other people, and 9 total votes on Lewis. Just by the odds, the moles are probably all on Lewis. The only reason I see to think there's a mole in that group of 3 (bob, Moore, and Diane) is that all 3 votes were placed BEFORE the suicide edit. Given that, if one of those 3 was scum, they'd probably just leave their vote. But if the scum were waiting a little to vote, or one or more of them was already voting for Lewis, it'd be easiest for the rest to jump on the wagon.
  6. mostlytechnic
    Well, bummer to have lost more CTU members. DARN IT! That said, why do you assume that there are moles off of the Lewis wagon? Assuming like you did that a mole voted for him before he went crazy, then why wouldn't the rest of the moles jump on after the penalty since it was a completely safe, blameless place to vote? If I was on the scum team that's what I'd have done.
  7. mostlytechnic
    Love these - thank you for sharing the files! I'm going to build several for my train layout once I can get back to working on that.
  8. mostlytechnic
    I highly suspect those who jumped on the Lewis wagon post-edit. (and yes, I know I'm in that group). THERE ARE SCUM there, DARN IT! I mean, what easier way for the scummos to get away with voting for a townie than jumping on a sealed bandwagon like that? And yes, the scum are also benefiting from the suicide-by-edit since they aren't getting scrutinized or voted for or anything else today.
  9. mostlytechnic
    I agree, I don't see a scum doing a deliberate suicide by edit. However, for the moment, I think this is more distracting than helpful townie behavior I snipped some irrelevant parts out of that quote. I agree, I've never seen Lewis act like this before and he's worked here for many years, so that's why I threw out the drunk on duty idea. Others have suggested jester, but that usually doesn't work unless it's a true lynch, not a suicide. A godfather would have zero reason to get lynched. Investigated, sure (which could explain some of the early crazy) but not lynched. (also note - there has not been a godfather in games recently where I was scum, and mafiascum changed godfather from normal to not-normal in 2016 since it's a lying role) Paranoid gun owner doesn't make sense either. Since they kill whoever targets them, they're WAY more likely to kill a town PR than a scum. I read through a bunch of other roles, and I can't find anything that would makes sense of a suicide by edit. Also, Inmate, note that we haven't gotten an official vote count since the edit, but Lewis should have 5 penalty votes from that and so he's got WAY more votes than needed to lynch.
  10. mostlytechnic
    I'm nervous by how many people (you, and Dianne both) are defending Lewis. I agree that he's probably town, but that's different than openly defending him. Possibly, but I don't think suicide by edit counts. I'm thinking we have a security person drunk while on duty. DARN IT! Well, if he's scum and suiciding, that is GOOD for the town. I'm not sure that works - the rules talk about voting to lynch A person. Even if multiple had enough votes due to penalties, I think the highest vote count is the only one lynched. But we'd need clarification from Jack on that - he does tend to think like a GO TEAM member and say KILL THEM ALL! Vote: Lewis (jamesn) Since he's made it easy... and I don't have a better target at the moment. And at this point, Lewis is a distraction and better to be gone.
  11. mostlytechnic
    "I'm satisfied" does not a vote-reason make. Care to explain why you're voting for Benson? As others have ALREADY SAID - DARN IT! - this makes no sense. We can assume no such thing. If anyhting, a vanilla claim on day 1 is highly suspicious since there's NO REASON to be doing that. Other than being scum and hoping to get checked out, while a watcher sees who the investigator is. For the record, I've been in a PM chat with Officer Lewis that he started with me. Nothing too serious, just throwing a few ideas around. I was NOT in any PM chats with anyone else yet, including our dead security officer. I don't see anything wrong with it - but it's something to be careful in since there's no way to know yet whether the other person is scum yet. I've been burned before by chatting with a traitor.
  12. mostlytechnic
    This all seems like crazy desperation analysis, or worse, scum trying to look helpful. I thought we had experienced security guards around here. Or does my GO TEAM need to take over? In fact, rule 12 specifically says there are NO CLUES IN IMAGES. DARN IT! I want MORE CLUES not LESS! So you suspected someone because they answered in character as opposed to answering the generic way you thought they should? Rule 1 clearly says that CTU = Town and Moles = Scum, so I don't understand why you were so suspicious of the answer.
  13. mostlytechnic
    Clever idea to make a completely Lego relay like that! Takes a ton of space though, but if you've got the room and want to stay 100% genuine parts, it's a good idea.
  14. mostlytechnic
    I debated switching my vote, but there's NO POINT NOW. We've got votes scattered all over and just a TINY BIT OF TIME LEFT. DARN IT! You all just feel so scummy to me. THERE'S MOLES HERE! I say we kill everyone but me and then CTU WINS! That's the best plan - kill em all and let God sort them out!
  15. mostlytechnic
    According to MY COUNT! DARN IT! (oops, habit there....) Alfred (zepher) 1 Barry (kristel) 1 Benson (LMF) 2 bob (bob) 1 Diane (fhomess) 2 Kaster (Lady K) 1 Riley (jluck) 2 Larry (khscarymovie) 2 zip (me) 1 CHLOE, CHECK my list and make sure IT'S RIGHT. Cause right now NO ONE is getting LYNCHED.
  16. mostlytechnic
    I'd have to agree that moles are terrible pets. Always trying to kill you at night....
  17. mostlytechnic
    Ah, yes, the usual. "I've been BUSY. I'll look around and TALK LATER." Not BUYING IT. Yeah, us GO TEAM guys are used to quick action. Not like you congress critters that do nothing and spend all your time campaigning instead of DOING YOUR JOB. Well, NOT ENOUGH to be worth changing my VOTE YET. DARN IT!!! Keep hunting people!
  18. mostlytechnic
    Well, LET'S VOTE! Vote: Alfred Drew (zepher) Since he HASN'T SPOKEN UP yet. DARN IT!! poke... poke... POKE!...
  19. mostlytechnic
    I think I FOUND A mole! Making a useless comment, just agreeing with others, on DAY ONE. Obvious SCUM PLOY!
  20. mostlytechnic
    A flyer? How old ARE you? No one reads stuff on paper anymore. Yes, I like this plan. Blow stuff up is a good solution to most problems. GO GO GO! Suck it up cupcake. We don't have time for "potty breaks" or snacks or other nonsense. FIND THE MOLES and KILL THEM!
  21. mostlytechnic
    The Lego Servo will go proportional if you use the speed remote instead of the simple PF remote.
  22. mostlytechnic
    You could always sticker over the Hogwarts, if you're doing custom decals anyway....
  23. mostlytechnic
    Thanks for those updates viktor - I had noticed the channel changing, but I hadn't tested out those other features yet. The speed regulating train motor looks like a GREAT feature, although it also makes wrecking easier :)
  24. mostlytechnic
    Zip here. LET'S GO! I'm INTENSE! Jack Bauer has nothing on HOW I CAN YELL!
  25. mostlytechnic
    Test Table Column 1 Column 2 More stuff Other stuff Another row And this too That's a copy/paste from excel; it works sort of. There's no way to get lines to help delineate items. Header Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 More stuff Something here And over here That actually worked - that's a C&P from Word. Thanks for the suggestion!
×
×
  • Create New...