Jump to content

Jurss

Eurobricks Dukes
  • Posts

    3,509
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jurss

  1. Really good, especially as alternate for some set. All those new panels really help to make this specific shape.
  2. One thing is missing for perfect in front it has to have this or even better
  3. https://www.lego.com/en-us/product/caterham-seven-620r-21307 Not sure if it looks better, but it is juts too big for brick built car and for ideas. Yes, something in creator scale, like that caterham, that would have a chance.
  4. Sorry, really busy, will try this evenening
  5. Looks really good. Functions as expected. For most users in this forum nice parts pack for DBG panels :) For somebody really good first and/or display set. it will sell well.
  6. I think, in this case it would be also OK to rebuild some studded set, and shrinked could be studdless. For wheeled cars it is really easy, You should use smaller tires and scale everything according to them. Also for tracks the same. You can't use the same size tracks. The same rule could be also applied for propellers. Anyway, forum admin can always have last word. Also, color scheme should be kept the same (at least some 90%), I think
  7. This is technic formum, I think. Let's not mix. That could be other contest - recrate some other theme set in to technic.
  8. This is really good. Also available parts use is really good.
  9. I don't think, that for this we need to have specific rules about parts count or similar. I hope, everyone understands, what is shrinking Build needs to be smaller than original (tracks, wheels or tires should be smaller, etc.), it should be clearly look like original, have as much as possible function from original. Motorised function can be replaced with purely mechanical.
  10. It took me long to connect this topic name with its content :D
  11. Maybe winner of last contest could choose from shortlist, which contest could be next?
  12. It seems, that You have had lot of thinking. That's good. And still, I see, that it is planned, that those click hinges also will be supported, there where will be construction, on which they will rest, so those two pins then really doesn't seems an issue. Anyway, first buy parts (if You don't have) for one ring to test everything. Of course, if money is not an issue, then this step is not necessary :)
  13. OK :) If not mistaken, there will be some 10 connection points, so some 800g on each. Not very critical, but could be close to limits (lego plastic is pretty sturdy), especially, if they need to hold also some moving of whole structure to some exposition or something. I'm afraid, that those lower click hinges could be weakest point, or that section of some 4 studs from that vertical beam to that click hinge.
  14. Only suggestion - multiply connection points. I'm just curious - where there will be 7kg+?
  15. interC@Ptor Police (COP) interceptor, so Space police. Functions: mowing wings (for takeoff etc.) mowing rear thruster - up, down, sideways wing and rear thruster synced movement by levers in cokpit some adjustable weapons in front Main functions mechanism
  16. It is OK, accroding to latest lego quality standards, like colour variations, misaligned axle holes etc.
  17. You can buy Jerone instructions. You can find some examples of real mechanisms on the internet, and then try to replicate it. Build some basic model, mechanism, which could be for that folding roof, try to improve it.
  18. I was thinking about levers somewhere on top, but that is just too much to hide with good body.
  19. Yes they still are. Nothing close to that 42005 really nice, soft, responsive suspension.
×
×
  • Create New...