Jump to content

BrickbyBrickTechnic

Eurobricks Counts
  • Posts

    1,641
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BrickbyBrickTechnic

  1. The MOC itself is great, but it's the use of the rim which is amazing! Thumbs up from me
  2. I like your outriggers, they are ingeniously simple. On the other hand, what exactly is this (or based off of)? A picture would be nice. Good luck!
  3. Your first buggy has much improved since I saw it! Very nice For your skidder, not gonna lie, it looks disproportionate, and the articulated joint seems pretty weak. Not sure if you're still working on it, but that's just my 2 cents. Your second buggy has a very nice front suspension.
  4. Based on the prelims, there was no evidence that pneumatics were used... it's for the better, I guess.
  5. Though I'm mostly into technic, I am a huge fan of all the big sets LEGO releases (2000+ pieces). I would say this is awesome! This would clearly appeal to a younger demographic much more than a Wayne Manor, so kudos to LEGO for the strategic move. I personally think that while it is just so with the cool, it lacks proper collector's value, which would explain the overall dismay. I also disagree with the overpricedness, the 42056 is the same price but contains 740 pieces less.
  6. I would say plow, though the current is too big. If you made it smaller, that would be better.
  7. Agreed. Having seen my friend's 42039, I knew I would have to get these wheels eventually.
  8. No need for PF IMO. I think the Mack truck could be 9397 size at that price, which is great.
  9. Good idea, though I'm not sure that it makes sense. Why would a crop sprayer have it? If you know why, please educate me
  10. If you're as bad at applying stickers as me, just stick your nail under a slightly loose flap and pull. If not, your nail should still do fine if you can get under the sticker.
  11. This is awesome! Lots of cool functions in a (fairly) small package!
  12. Thanks, glad you enjoy! This isn't based on anything specific, just the quote from Jim's review in the very first post. @I_Igor I have ordered the tires that come with 42039 (not sure about the exact size). They should fit nicely.
  13. I have yet to purchase these. Unfortunately, an engine with genuine pistons doesn't fit the scale.
  14. I guess that's a good thing because they're awesome and I'd love to see more.
  15. Awesome! The extra details you added are the cherry on top of this model. The stickers you added are quite nice.
  16. UPDATE TIME! This update mostly concerns the rear suspension and the engine. The engine is lower than before, and its a mini v10. The suspension is harder and more responsive. As for steering modes, gearing up additionally only added resistance and the rear wheels didn't steer. Adding a clutch on both sides didn't help. I only have 1 more idea, which I will reveal if it works. The front was rebuilt to add durability. Of course, some outline was also added for scale. Here are some pictures: So that's it. Leave a comment!
  17. Unfortunately, I agree. On the other hand, if this was a generic model (no brand attached) my opinion would be different. Also, you should remove those 8t gears from drivetrain.
  18. I'll give you a hint: not as much as you think Not kidding.
  19. Getting back to the futuristic topic for a second, As long as they keep it within the b models, I'm not too concerned, but futuristic A models?
  20. Have you tested the gear trains yet? If not, I advise you to do so before continuing.
  21. Wow, I quite like it so far. My question though, will the pneumatics be able to bend the tubing as much as it will need to (alot)? Also, the rear structure currently looks weak. Any chance that can improve?
  22. They had better not. Can't they just stick to the present??
  23. Very nicely done. I can see much improvement between this and your previous MOCs.
×
×
  • Create New...