Jump to content

BrickBob Studpants

Eurobricks Archdukes
  • Posts

    13,906
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BrickBob Studpants

  1. Simpsons and TLBM. Granted, the latter definitely would’ve outstayed its welcome with a third series, but Simpsons could’ve had one if the second series hadn’t bombed
  2. Could HP be the theme to finally break the licensed CMF series curse? Unless Disney breaks it first of course
  3. Wait, this thing is real?! Someone at LEGO loves Venom to an unhealthy degree
  4. I guess you’re referring to HP and DC, the rest seem to be doing fine SW is a huge step up from the January wave and Marvel seems to be on a winning streak as well with the Shang-Chi and Eternals sets
  5. Isn’t that the same werewolf head mould they’ve been using since 2012?
  6. *sad official LEGO fortune teller team noises* They could still release a set later-on, even though the show’s popularity obviously won’t sustain itself for that long. That’s the problem with the one-off shows If you’re referring to Funko, they just throw everything and their grandmother to the wall to see what sticks
  7. Touché. But the most important characters we’re still missing are mostly from GoF onwards If Molly, Lucius, and Viktor don’t deserve new face prints, neither do these two
  8. The fact we haven’t heard anything about the minifigs yet luckily doesn’t imply anything, so the sets could still be worth getting based on the minifig selection alone Not getting my hopes up though, especially not for anything post-POA
  9. Did he? I thought that was just mere guesswork on our side Lockhart (can’t have too many versions of him), Sinestra, and Cat Hermione. The rest are a nice bonus since I’m mostly looking forward to the Basilisk and the Fluffy
  10. Funko make products on virtually anything that can’t escape fast enough Personally, I’d be ok with WandaVision CMF minifigs
  11. If they’re not placeholders, the Fluffy set wins the award for worst minifig selection in the HP reboot
  12. Looney Tunes? Bold? The Looney Tunes are not some obscure cartoon, they’re on the same level of pop culture iconicity as the classic Disney cartoons And speaking of nostalgia: the DC CMF series wasn’t filled to the brim with obscure characters and versions, right?
  13. I’m not so sure about that, just because they have prices and part counts doesn’t mean they know the sets’ names (or more). They’ve also had the same information about other unknown sets for quite a while now (Mario & Marvel for instance)
  14. It’s one year for regular sets. Also, we don’t know if any sets were even planned for 2022 in the first place and if there were, they might as well have pushed them back to 2023
  15. The way I see it, there’s the following options to explain our minifig situation: Falconfan & Guyon don’t know the minifig selection but didn’t mention anything in order to prevent us from rising our hopes too much again (since mediocre sets can be saved by a good minifig selection) The set selection is so poor that even the best minifigs couldn’t save it, so mentioning them would be completely pointless (impossible in my book, but that’s just me ) They do know the minifig selection, and it’s just as poor as the set selection There simply aren’t any minifigs If the minifig selection was actually good, I think either of our informants would’ve mentioned that. Maybe it’s option 1, but I’m not counting on that
  16. Am I the only one who finds it weird that the quality of the minifig selection hasn’t been mentioned before, not even once? I mean, good minifigs could save even the most mediocre of sets, so this is somewhat concerning. Maybe it’s just a collection of brickbuilt magical creatures at various price points after all
  17. As far as I remember, it was indeed the set selection that’s disappointing, not the actual quality of the sets Exactly. No matter how detailed and well-constructed Dobby’s sock was, nobody would buy it, except for us clowns of course
  18. I know the feeling. In my case, it takes at least 5 hours in any direction to get to the next LEGO store by train I was so happy to hear about the new store opening in Stuttgart this year, only to realise it would still take me 5 hours to actually get there. My dream is to see a store opening in Switzerland one day, but I’m not holding my breath That would actually be pretty cool. Pretty bland in terms of minifigs I would imagine, but Fang would easily make up for that. Plus a golden Hagrid despite inquiring a ridiculous amount of recoloured pieces
  19. Just keep in mind that the main attraction this year would have been the postponed JWD sets, so a vast majority of the theme’s budget must’ve gone into them. The 4 we’re getting now are far less likely to introduce new moulds. The only new ones I’m expecting are moulds that were initially intended to be featured in the JWD wave of sets
  20. Not a bad idea actually, but I'm not sure if Fawkes is important enough to warrant a set that big. If Hedwig can be realized at 40$, I think Fawkes could easily be done at 80$ max I'd buy that in a heartbeat
  21. No worries, I know the feeling We'll get proper info soon enough, it can't evade us forever
  22. Fair enough Though I'm not sure which creature would justify a set at that price point
  23. Agreed, the PPRs for these three are good, but not out of the ordinary for this theme. 76392's however is exceptional, that one has to be something none of us had on our radars. It's basically the largest non-D2C set so far The whole FB thing sounds pretty sketchy to me
  24. "Art" is its own theme and therefore has its own separate set numbers. Besides, we already have a HP-themed Art set And a "helmet"-style set doesn't make much sense either, think of all the pieces they'd have to recolour in light flesh From what we know, they don't plan that far ahead usually
  25. Yeah, PPRs that good usually come with strings attached 76389 already has a good PPR, even with at least two new moulds included and this one just blows it out of the water in that regard. Probably includes a lot of small parts, but no idea what the set could be The release date has to be wrong, but it's not just a simple copy-paste error because the date is indicated is "6/2021" whereas it's "06/2021" for the other sets
×
×
  • Create New...