Jump to content

Bartybum

Eurobricks Dukes
  • Posts

    2,631
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bartybum

  1. I’d like to see C+ sets using pneumatic auto valves
  2. I mean, we’re pretty much exclusively talking about the arm, since it is after all the main feature. A trial truck could indeed work, although it’d have to have live axles or else it’d just be functionally boring
  3. Did the model on display have a boxy appearance like the V22, or was it smooth and round like the AW609?
  4. EDIT: oh god oh fk wrong thread, mods pls delet
  5. Who am I kidding, I'd love for them to make a flagship like this . Can't imagine the monumental cost though. EDIT: Looking at the designer's page (https://www.martin-hartwigsen.nl/models/machinery/) it only uses about 3500 parts, but eleven motors. I dunno :S
  6. That’s precisely the model I had in mind. It’s slow and sways around a rather large amount.
  7. Bear in mind though, a forest harvester with 8 Claas wheels would be insanely huge and probably pushing beyond Technic limits.
  8. @Gzynek2323 Same, it's the most i c o n i c muscle car from F&F
  9. F&F is not exclusively ricers... muscle cars have played just as significant a role
  10. Ah yes, I remember that. I do hope they include the panhard rods, that'd be really nice. I really doubt we'll see sprung/hydro suspension since the A60H doesn't have it
  11. I can't find the video you linked. Could you link it again?
  12. Same. I've been saying it and I'll say it again, aside from the weird proportions, the designer's done a fantastic job creating a model with clean aesthetics
  13. Oh man I agree with you so much
  14. @Gimmick yeah I figured the front would also be suspended
  15. So I've been investigating the suspension of the real A60H, and it turns out the rear axles don't seem to be sprung, but pendular, which I find surprising. I can't find any information about the front axle, but I feel it would make sense for the real thing to have it sprung.
  16. You’d better justify this. I think you’re exaggerating immensely. What did you think of 42030?
  17. Wtf hold up, the only egregious thing so far is that its proportions are off.
  18. Honestly, I don't really think they're as obsessed as us. 42053 didn't have super accurate proportions either (those were to do with colouring though)
  19. The Volvo? Nah no chance they'd spend that money on new molds, it's gonna just be the Unimog tyre
  20. It literally says A60H on the yellow curved panel
  21. Might make the model look smaller, possibly making it look less worth its price. I doubt it's anything that sinister though, I think the designer just got it wrong. I'm curious as to how it steers. Can anyone confirm whether we're looking at LA steering or something as boring as 42030-A's solution?
  22. That doesn't deal with the fact that we pretty much never see any changes made But honestly, aside from the weird proportions, it's a very nice looking set. I just hope the suspension turns out nice
×
×
  • Create New...