Yzalirk

I should have a build or two up tomorrow or Friday. By Saturday, I'll have an entry up for each category.

Sinclair, your reasons are getting weaker each post. You have no proof that I apparently tried to deny a lynching that was clearly going to go through, which you did the same. You had almost no attempt to counter-argue what I said except for repeating yourself. There, I'll... Vote: Scaevola (Sinclair Viola) Because Siegfried was right about Figurelli and caught him in his lie. If you do come up as a Loyalist then the our speaker has a lot of explaining to. But due to his excellent presentation against Figurelli yesterday, I trust what Siegfried says.

I guess I'll share some things on you then. Her's what you said on Day One, I agree, there wasn't an excuse for your fluff posts but you continued that on Day Two, I'll get to that in a second. You supported the fact for a Day One lynch but instead, voted for Brickelodeon and not Calanon. That's a bit odd but you did state your reason for voting against him. Let's continue to what you said on Day Two. More fluff yet you said it inexcusable yet you continued... Again, you said it was inexcusable and you expect not to look suspicious for it. Your vote against Bryant is oddly reasoned but makes sense at the same time. He voted due to a hunch, just like what others have done. Did others have to vote against Calanon? No, of course not! But it seems very suspicious that you, the only voter against him, comes up impeached on Night Two. No one else suspected him at the time besides you. On Day Three, there isn't much to say about you but this was a bit interesting, I found you suspicious on Day One, and I voted for you. I should also add that you've found me suspicious on days Two and Three but never voted for me. Day Three can be excused since StickFig got caught pretty badly but you could have easily voted against me on Day Two. There's are just some points I wanted to bring up. Do I find you suspicious? Yes I do, but not at the tippy top of my suspects.

I suppose but of all people, why go for Palacios over Addie on Day Two despite her continuing her fluff posts? Don't you think Sinclair would have tried to a lynch on Day Two for Addie rather than target Palacios for abstaining on Day One? That's what I find to be a bit odd and questionable. Really? Of all the time you could have said something you come up with this? I never said he's a fool or a buffoon, I said he was acting like one. Asking for sympathy isn't going to save him, putting up a fight just might. Also, it's really disappointing that you've only adsorbed just that out of all I said. And it's not meant to be taken personally, it's a game. If anyone takes it to heart, I apologize but seriously, it's a game, strong feelings are going to be said.

Then can you interpret this? You dislike the fact I may have bandwagoned yet you condone the fact it should be done? You should remember this, you did say it on Day One. You support a Day One lynch but you didn't vote for Calanon, despite the fact he/she was a Loyalist, and instead voted for Addie, whom only had 4 votes against her that day. You made a claim but you didn't actually support it yourself, not any of the days except for Day Two. You started a bandwagon against Palacios by saying this, If anything, Octan members would be all-aboard the bandwagon express, so saying that his vote was to try and deny the fact for a lynch, is silly. You did that on Day One, am I correct? And how else was he supposed to defend himself without risking his reputation? From experience, it's very hard and I don't blame him. And worst of all, since you started that bandwagon, he came up as a Loyalist. Now I'm not going to try and deny the fact I didn't vote for him when I clearly did, but because I believed it was the right choice. You're good, Sinclair, but not that good. You are being a hypocrite by accusing me of these actions when you condoned them on Day One and you didn't follow what you said. Your accusation against Palacios for trying to stop a lynch intrigues me since he never voted at all. So how did he exactly try to prevent a lynch when Calanon, the Day One lynch, was already set to be lynched? Care to try and counter what I've said here?

Are you complaining? Are you trying to win my vote to be against you? If anything, I thought you where too loud and targeted me, which you did the past days. If you haven't learned anything from the Palacios impeachment, you are quite foolish. I'm not saying that being quiet should go excused, especially on Day Four, but it shouldn't mean they're the scummiest of them all. Again, I would vote for you for acting like a buffoon and a quitter but that might be for another day. Again, you're avoiding my question. Why only target me for bandwagoning in a situation, like you clearly just said, everyone bandwagoned in? I actually wasn't aware that Figurelli was a confirmed scum until this day. That's what I find scummy about you - trying to target me for bandwagoning when other people clearly have, like yourself. I have a question for you though and I want you to give some thinking - If you are an Octan, was it hard to sell out one of your colleagues when he made it clear he was Octan without blatantly saying it?

Haha, works for me! Addie, and how long was Bjorn on for? I don't think people should be nominated scum of the day just because they're a bit quiet. Look at what happened to Palacios because we all thought that. Just because someone is too quiet doesn't mean they should be nominated as Octan so easily.

Salt-Upon-Wounds follows Vindsval.

I love this! Anyways, I wouldn't accuse Spalding of bandwagoning, Sinclair, when you've done it yourself. I do agree that Pierce is looking quite scummy but he isn't at the tippy-top of my scum list. I think it's you, Sinclair, for being quite manipulative and being eager to hear what others have to say rather than saying what you think. It's as if you don't want to say the wrong thing and look guilty, which I don't blame you, but being manipulative is just as bad, maybe even worse.

"Let's find the doctor and tell him his project has been dealt with."

"That was quite the fight, wouldn't you say Vindsval? As much as I'd like to take those items of you're hand, you keep them. I won't be sticking around too much, buddy."

You're not making any sense right now. According to you, you would have preferred if I bandwagoned on Day One but you don't condone the fact I may have done it one Day Two? It seems like you're trying to mislead people on your assumptions that prove nothing. I think scum would do that, wolf among sheep. But I've very curious as to how you came up with those conclusions based on innocent votes towards only me when 8 others voted for Palacios and you, me, and three others voted against Addie on Day One? Where you trying to obstruct a lynch, like you claim I tried to do?

That's why I meant. I did find a head similar to the one I plan to get and use but the eye just has like an eye patch, I guess that's what it's considered, on the head I'm getting. Since I'll be using the head for a Dwarf, a story about him tinkering/building something and getting injured would suffice, wouldn't you think? Since I need to get builds up, I might go with the adding the extra story later.

Care to share why you think that?

Beautiful Steampunk MOC's! I like how they all look and I wish I had the parts and skill to make things like these. You may very well be my favorite Steampunk builder now.

To answer your question, I don't believe so. I do know that everyone who is a part of GoH has their sig-fig shown on the first post. I know Kaliphlin does that but I haven't bothered to check on the other guilds.

The things I'm ordering definitely won't come by the date of when the contest ends so I was thinking if there's any way to manipulate certain things with certain camera angles. For instance, there's a head I wanted to use for a certain minifig but I don't have the head, since I'm ordering it, would it be more necessary to manipulate the shot of the picture and just imaging the head is there or make another MOC showing how the change occurred to the character? I like both ideas but I don't want to have nothing for the contest over something so simple.

Thank God we got an Octan out! I was thinking almost the same thing but instead of Bjorn I was thinking Sinclair might be Octan. I just get this odd feeling about them two...

"This poison is starting to get to me, I need to use a Remedy." Salt-Upon-Wounds consumes a Remedy in Back Row

Nice build and all but I don't understand why the Dwarves are in freezing water? Wouldn't they just drown?

Great news, Siegfried! I'm a bit surprised but intrigued, nonetheless. Perhaps I was wrong to quickly vote vote for Archie when Stanley is falling out of the raft right here. His claim for being the town vigilante when he had one vote against him, like Archie said, is a bit odd. I can understand if he told his role with more than one vote against him but he didn't so I feel like it's an excuse to try and save his own big behind a little too early. And the name calling, addressed to all of us, is a bit unnecessary, Unvote: Archie Matthews (Adam) Vote: Stanley Figurelli (Stickfig) Sorry, mate, but at the end of the day, there has to be a lynch and calling us all wimps over not voting for Siegfried didn't help, especially when you had just had a few votes against you.

Did you not pay attention to what I said? Readit again so you comprehend my reason. I'll let you ponder because, again, I still don't trust you so why would I tell you?

That's quite the conclusion but no, you're wrong. He was already going to be impeached (lynched) either way. So, whoever I was to vote for would make no impact. Essentially, you could see my vote as a "wasted" vote. I'm a bit curious as to why you are no longer suspicious off Addie, though. You have been for the past two days but no longer, care to share? I'd vote vote for Addie but, instead, I'll vote for: Vote: Archie Matthews (Adam) Mostly because of what he said about to loyalist role-blocker role-blocking someone last night. I know for a fact that the person didn't block anyone last night because this person told me himself/herself. Unless someone comes out looking like an Octan 100%, I think I'll keep my vote. I want to say my vote is a bit of a since I do want to hear more from Archie why he believes there was a role-block on someone last night but I'm getting a hunch.

Okay, cool, thanks Sandy!

"I can feel the poison flow though my veins. Vindsval, he's almost dead, let's put him down!" Salt-Upon-Wounds attacks Pestilence with Static Staff from Front Row