Yzalirk

Exactly what is it that you want to hear? That I didn't want to contribute to the lynching of a possible Loyalist? Look, now there's three Loyalists out, which is no good as of now. I still truly believe Addie could be Octan due to her fluff posts, even on Day Two! I don't think that should slide anymore. All I can suggest as of right now is to look back, collect some evidence, and find out some possible suspects who where against J. Leroy and Winnifred. Or there could be the possiblity of them choosing those two without any real motive. Well, since your so curious to hear from me, what do you think, Stanley?

"Alright, it's worth a shot. I'll do the same." Salt-Upon-Wounds uses Remedy on Steed of Pestilence from Back Row.

That would be pretty badass and funny. Since Dwarves like to tinker with things, is it possible that, say, my Dwarf had one that looked like that and was made by other Dwarves? And, like you said, the Bonapartes are the "largest purchasers of handcannons" so wouldn't that exclude them making them? And Merry Christmas everyone, hope your enjoying the holidays!

Okay, cool! I was looking at different designs and, despite these being a bit different, would one of these work [imaginatively]? I was thinking about making a Dwarf Ranger who uses something like one of those since an actual cannon would probably be too big and I'm not sure how the others would be made and they look kind of ugly.

I wasn't sure what it would be like Heroica since Hand Cannons are mainly Revolvers, which clearly wouldn't fit in the realm of Heroica. I couldn't find much examples but would it be something like this or this? In short, would it be more like a small cannon firearm or could it be larger? If so, why aren't Muskets an option?

Cool thanks! Also, what does it mean when it says that Rangers can use "hand cannons"?

This is kind of an odd question but can Rogues use Machetes?

"Sure thang!" Salt-Upon-Wounds attacks the Steed of Pestilence from Back Row with Static Staff.

I do believe there should be a lynching but there are still 3 people who haven't voted yet. I could change my vote because I do respect the fact that Addie has made better defenses than Carol has. I'm not sure what timezone she's in though so there's that to consider as well. Nonetheless, I still trust neither one.

Are you being serious right now? Please explain what is so helpful as to posting that. Summarizing what happens is a cheap way to appear active here and it doesn't even count as a contribution. Fluff is what you guys call it? At least make an attempt to be helpful instead of stating the damn obvious. As for you thinking I joined a bandwagon, no I didn't. If I had done so, I would not have any reason to vote for you. Actually, better yet, can you please explain how I am trying to bandwagon against you? Not once have I sad to vote for you nor did anyone influence me against you. I looked back, say your unless posts, and made my decision that way.

You never know, if you play your cards right and connect the dots, you can find find the scum quite easily. And my vote is here: Vote: Addie Tremain (adventurer1) I vote Addie because she's proven to be useless and basically just summarizes what has happened. Her posts are mostly just irrelevant. I would have voted Carol but she hasn't been as useless as Addie. I don't don't trust Carol though because she just has terrible excuses for things but I'd rather keep a player in who is at least trying. Random BS = good-bye!

I really like what you did here with this build! It reminds me of something out of Fable because of the almost cartoon-y style. Awesome build!

So why wouldn't you vote for the person who you think stands out more to be scum instead of the one who misinterpreted something? It also seems you like to hop on the bandwagon express, I'll keep that in mind. Right now, you seem pretty scummy. Especially since you aren't contributing the trying to "lynch" a possible Octanite. But if you are truly a Loyalist, just stop and reevaluate your strategy because you may very well help Octanites win. Or you could be an Octanite and just making yourself look bad and digging yourself a deeper grave.

That's quite ironic coming from the one with only four posts that are pretty much useless like: What help is that? You also did say earlier that you'd vote for Siegfried Dixon but you never even voted. How are you just as reliable? If anything, you seem pretty useless. And your #2 reason for voting against me is just stupid since I did unvote and basically admit how stupid it was for me to revenge vote without any evidence to back it up.

You could have abstained and not voted, like some people did. So saying you had to vote is not going to cut it. Three people is quite a lot of people though. I'm also not sure why you'd "note" a mislabel but I'm fine with you being ridiculous especially considering that it's not important whatsoever unless you'd like to elaborate as to why it's important to you though.

I went back to see why people find Carol a bit scummy and I'm starting to agree. Now, I'm not going to join the bandwagon and vote just yet. Carol, can you explain to me why it seems like you gave some weak reasons for voting for yourself? And Sinclair, why were you so quick to vote for her as a speaker? I find it a bit odd to vote for someone who gives a weak reason that is basically "I vote for myself because I'm old". It seems like they were all kind of evasive on questions and I want to know, from you, why you believe Carol was the least evasive?

I'll have to get started with my scenes for the categories but I'm a bit worried about getting my minifigs I order before January 4th. Do you guys mind if I post the builds without the minifigs in it?

I'm lost, why is everyone voting Caroll Nottingham? I'm assuming, for now, it's just a "friendly" poke..?

That's cute, especially since you've been awfully quiet for most of the day. I'll also keep this in mind: Clearly, you don't trust much people as much as I do, and that's why I abstained earlier. But according to what you've said, I'd keep an eye out on Stanley since he hasn't responded to your question for him voting on the one person, and I'm sure he read it. As for you, I did jump to quite the conclusion and that is why I unvoted. I was also unaware that the votes for the speaker had ended, which is my fault for not reading thoroughly. I'm trying to be as cautious as I can with voting for the speaker. Who's to say they can be trusted if it's only been Day One?

Yet you quote one and not the other? I find that a bit sketchy to leave one person out of the picture who accused me without evidence apart from trying to make me look guilty for abstaining in the mean time. But I'll... Unvote: Winnifred Karchevsky (Walter Kovacs) For now but let me tell you boy-o, I'll have my eye on you as well as Mrs. Winnifred Karchevsky. You can still keep your vote if you'd like, Karchevsky, but you should know your accusations have no foundation. If you have some factual evidence you'll like to try and use against me, I'm all ears. Speaker: Speedy (Siegfried Dixon) Happy?

Exactly. So why don't you tell Mrs. Winnifred Karchevsky that as well? Where was the evidence for her to vote me? Simply because I wanted to abstain a vote? For what I'm thinking right now because you are bias against me, you might be in cahoots with your Octan buddy. I'm a very forgiving person though and I'm ready to unvote Mrs. Winnifred Karchevsky as long as she unvotes me due to a lack of evidence. And just maybe I'll vote for who I think should be our speaker.

So what you are saying is that we should be careful who we vote for as speaker later down the line? If what you are saying is true, I'll trust you on it and perhaps I'll cast my vote in after all.

You believe I'm with Octan simply because I abstain a vote? Who's to say you're not with Octan? I mean, you are pretty quick to point the figure at me with no evidence. I don't want any Octan supporters as a speaker and it's only Day One so relax big guy... or girl. I don't want to contribute to having an Octan supporter as speaker since I'm not sure who is who just yet, that's all. But seriously though, I can play ball too. Vote: Winnifred Karchevsky (Walter Kovacs)

"Don't worry, Isaac, it is not your fault. Your father should have given up on his work to support you and your mother. Now is your time to stand up to the Rosalia Pestilence, for both your mother and father. It must not harm anyone else. So what do you say, Isaac, care to help us defeat tyrannical plague once and for all?" "Vindsval, we mustn't let the Rosalia Pestilence escape, we have to defeat it once and for all. Not only for us to but Isaac and his family and the safety for Olegaia. Just imagine the havoc it will wreak on everyone if it wins. Vindsval, let's do this. Are you ready?"

I'll have to abstain my vote on this one. I don't see a clear reason to vote anyone for speaker when they haven't given much of a reason as to why they should be voted.