Jump to content

__________________________

Eurobricks Knights
  • Posts

    684
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by __________________________

  1. This is very cool! I should build this with my 42008 (;
  2. An L motor setup would be way cheaper and use less battery power.
  3. Regarding bodywork, there's too much empty space. Regardless, it captures the overall shape.
  4. New buggy motor, new micro motor, new remote control system, and new large pneumatic cylinders so LPE Nicjasno engines are cheaper
  5. Madoca1977 builds always deserve better instructions better than the Google pictures he's taken. . . :thumbup: Also thanks for keeping the number of rare pieces reasonably low! Any chance of instructions for his Supercar? http://www.eurobrick...showtopic=83913
  6. So it would pull tires off the car?
  7. It does seem like 9398 should be 4WD out of the box, since it's A FLAGSHIP :thumbdown: I frequently build Technic sets incorrectly, so I could see this argument, although maybe TLG could've just made the B model have 2WD.
  8. Thanks! I'll start with Sariel's gear reduction, change the wheels, and see if I can still use that extra torque! Why would the Crawler hit a wall? its an outdoor toy
  9. I just got a copy of 9398 and I'm wondering if there are any good mods with 2+ XL's for propulsion. I did some searches and couldn't find anything that resembled 9398.
  10. However, Lego parts are (mostly) easier to find and buy than the IRLV.
  11. I agree. it looks like, with a bit of mods to the body, this could have 2 L motors, for twice the total torque. Also, I'd angle the front windshield, change the headlights, and replace the 6X AA battery pack with 2 8878s, to save weight.
  12. There are so many people looking up the instructions the URL crashed Nice-looking truck, with an impressive number of functions.
  13. Any recomendations for good aftermarket wheels? I want better grip.
  14. it seems to move around too much at the hips.
×
×
  • Create New...