Clone OPatra

It was never about keeping those discussions off of EB as a whole, just out of this thread so that this thread could remain readable for a reasonable amount of time for those who have not seen the film. This is mini-modding. You are not a staff member.

It can be a separate thread. It looks like one has now been started.

NOPE. Movie talk stops now.

Yes, no talking about the film at all. That will hold for Americans as well for at least a week after the film has been released. I understand people's pressing desire to discuss the film and the sets as they relate to the film, but not everyone gets to run and out see it right away, and we do not want people to be spoiled. It has happened in the past. People may still be coming to this topic for news and discussion of upcoming 2016 sets, so keep Civil War discussion out of here. This is not a Civil War 2016 sets and discussion topic. The reason I am going for 'no spoilers at all' is because I've seen what happens when people dive into a page discussion in spoiler tags. Inevitably what begins in spoiler tags does not end in them.

As I said a few pages ago, DO NOT TALK ABOUT THE FILM. That includes: NO SPOILER TAGS. I don't care if it's 'not really a spoiler' or 'minor' or whatever. Take it elsewhere. If you think it could go in spoiler tags, DO NOT POST IT. It's really not that hard to just keep your fingers from typing things about the film. From now on I will delete any posts that I think come close to containing spoilers.

Eurobricks is not a billboard for attracting traffic to your videos. We allow the posting of videos when it applies to other discussions, but not when it is clearly intended to draw traffic to your channel. This topic and the other similar one will be locked. Feel free to PM me if you wish to discuss it. Thanks.

Bob asks people to stick to the topic and the next three posts are utter nonsense? That's not what we like to see. Participate constructively or don't participate at all.

You may be on mobile, but this member is now Taking a Break.TO ALL: There has been a lot of mini-modding around these parts recently. Do not tell other members what they can and cannot post. Even if you absolutely know without a shadow of a doubt that somebody is in the wrong, it's not your place to say anything. Use the Report button. Thanks.

The movie releases in some markets this week, but fourth set speculation will remain just that: speculation.As a general reminder to everyone, this thread is to remain SPOILER FREE. If you've got spoilers to discuss, take them to Culture & Multimedia. In here, I don't even want to see spoiler tags - just keep it elsewhere until several weeks after the film has been released in all markets.

A staff member already responded to this. Please do not continue to respond or mini-mod.

Trading does NOT belong here. We have a Buy/Sell/Trade forum for that, and if you can't post there, there's a reason for the rule as well. I cannot honestly say that talk of finding Silver Centurion does not belong here. Don't drag it out, but if you have methods of finding exclusive minifigures that you can share with the community, I view that as a service. Yes, these things sometimes are region-specific, but I don't particularly want a slew of 'Finding Sets in X Country' threads. Silver Centurion is a 2016 minifigure or 'set,' and this is a discussion of 2016 Marvel minifigures/sets, so… it is what it is.

7868 Mace Windu's Jedi Starfighter included a new Tactical Droid mould. 7869 Battle for Geonosis included Luminara's head-covering, which had appeared way back in 2005 but I would gander required re-tooling or a new mould altogether by 2011 (speculation though). Back farther, 7754 Home One had the Mon Cal head, and 7752 Solar Sailer was I believe the first appearance of Count Dooku's widow's peak hair.Point is, this type of 'fact' is pure speculation. Even D2C sets have first-release parts now, like Slave I or the Kwik-E-Mart or the Minecraft Village, etc.

Friendly reminder about a couple of rules we have around here: 1 Do not post confidential/watermarked images. 2 DO NOT MINI-MOD Use the report button if you think someone is out of line or not following site guidelines. Start telling a person they are breaking rules in a thread, start warning them of 'being banned,' and YOU are now not following site guidelines.

So that would make a lot of sense - one side, which we're seeing, is pre-rejuvenation, and the other side will have black facial hair. That would be pretty neat.

I wouldn't be sure about the face or the yellow cape, but the rest looks like Ra's.

Yep, too far off topic. Take any further Robin talk to the general DC speculation thread please.

Always trusty Eurobricks member just2good has turned up images for some of the new LEGO Marvel and DC Superheroes sets, hitting stores this summer! Click the picture of 76054 Batman: Scarecrow Harvest of Fear to join the DC discussion and 75057 Spider-Man: Web Warriors Ultimate Bridge Assault for Marvel!

The Civil War Spidey isn't really the answer to my Spidey problems because LEGO keeps making animated TV-show related Spidey sets with the horrible one. I'd like a re-design for the animated sets too. They could just go with comic variants since the sets don't strictly follow show designs anyhow. But yes, having one different Spidey in one set at least will be good.

There have been - the BvS Batwing and Jokerland come to mind. Even if LEGO wants to keep the legs out of the smaller sets (still a sly move if you ask me), the bigger ones should warrant it.Or they could, you know, design a new and much better Spidey.

I can't comprehend why TLG gave Spidey dual-moulded legs in the one construction site set, and never again. Even in the big bridge set, no dual-moulded legs!

That set looks underwhelming. The model looks almost under-detailed for what it's trying to accomplish, and the minifigure selection is lacking both in number and in the fact that the clones do not include helmets with worn printing. Zen could've easily been thrown into this set given his role in the with the vehicle. Fifth Brother is the best thing I see here.

Well yes, something quite like that only the front half and much, much smaller.

If amazingbricks would like to provide us with an actual description of something he's heard, he may. Otherwise, rough fake images and hints and winky-faces do not belong here.

Yeah, I wouldn't bet on there being a Cinderella minifigure. The set is called 'Cinderella's Castle' because in the park it's called 'Cinderella's Castle,' not because it really has all that much to do with Cinderella the character. But we shall see eventually. I would hope for more than Tinkerbell to be the only new character included.

The first post contains all the information we know.