Jump to content

NoEXIST

Eurobricks Citizen
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    312

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by NoEXIST

  1. NoEXIST
    I think we can start first pre-order! Contact me on rcdeck.order@gmail.com
  2. NoEXIST
    Oh, now I see, I swapped contacts while writing post. I meant gnd and 9v
  3. NoEXIST
    Not sure, but C1 and C2 are just to power electronics used in servos and PF receivers. As I know they don't work exactly the same as regular motor contacts do
  4. NoEXIST
    Just PF ones?
  5. NoEXIST
    Yeah, know that, which cables are you using for power circuit? I went the most practical way and used same wires as ESC were produced with
  6. NoEXIST
    Heavy duty gear! That's a nice idea to operate 2 channels through 1 port. I'm preparing to show the inside of mine box soon, looking forward to see yours too if it's possible:) I've seen the prices for remote... How much would it be for the box?
  7. NoEXIST
    Yeah, I see Sounds similar to what I use for PU port in mine, but also seems you found something smaller! Basically we have same products with different amount of channel and different size. I hope we will soon offer a solutions for both purposes! And hopefully they will last a while as I'm afraid that PF is slowly dying
  8. NoEXIST
    @MisterCreators Custom MOCsthis is a nice concept, but I bet you did resolder wires? M/L/XL normally use only two contacts (in the middle) and the other 2 are used in PF servo and other things like receivers. Am I correct? So your RC box is made similarly like mine, receiver and ESC's inside and the battery outside? But the purpose is not to power as much Buggy motors in small size as possible but to make a lot of channels to control complex creations? I didn't think it's a nice idea to use RC for such models before as I mostly see 2-4 channel remote used in cars:) Are these RC receivers and transmitters from plane and scale construction vehicles world?
  9. NoEXIST
    I can see 6 pf ports in your unit, how can you use another 10 channels? They will be connected via JR connectors directly to the receiver or something like that?
  10. NoEXIST
    Actually, after I build this final one, I can open order for first batch and order the components😁
  11. NoEXIST
    Waited quite a long time for these!
  12. NoEXIST
    In case of render you posted, making 7 studs between levers
  13. NoEXIST
    Sort of. It's geometrically correct to have drive shaft same length and parallel to your suspension arms. In case of your buggy: I would make shorter arms and make mounts wider. Your CV joints will work with less angle, which is better for them
  14. NoEXIST
    There is an issue that you're making in some of the chassises. Would be much better if you'll make your drive shafts the same length as your suspension levers are. Your drive shafts will remain the same length in whole suspension travel.
  15. NoEXIST
    It's really nice to see you're back! And this thing is wild! I love the curves and how it performs. It drives very nicely knowing that there are just 2 bw3 units and 4 motors!
  16. NoEXIST
    Thanks! I will let know there when the order for the first batch will be open so I can order all components in a proper quantity. Non pistol remote can't be used with RCDeck with built in receiver. But as I mentioned before, in version with external receiver almost everything will be possible! That's a battery I'm using: https://a.aliexpress.com/_EGuKP3J (Next I'm going for something a bit bigger) And this is charger that should work https://a.aliexpress.com/_EyOJSc5 (But I got myself IMAX b6)
  17. NoEXIST
    Wow! The skull is built amazing! Very cool alternative model!
  18. NoEXIST
    There it is
  19. NoEXIST
    Recheck the info, I was a little bit mistaken. 4*5*5, it's lower (photo by @osterum)
  20. NoEXIST
    4*5*6 to be accurate, asked my friend about dimensions few days ago:) both are 4 stud wide, but pne of them is 5 studs long and the other 7, but height is the opposite, 6 vs 3
  21. NoEXIST
    @gyenesvi I would say right now RCDeck is very similar to RC brick (even dimensions are similar) difference is that mine now has 2 additional channels. Actually want to say that I'm happy even with 2 channels as RC brick was, but why not to add 2 more channel if it's possible? Yes, PU port uses another ESC, actually if you have PU/PF adapter you can power another buggy motor:)
  22. NoEXIST
    I'm sure they choose Bluetooth and app to control their models because it doesn't need any changes in hardware to build something completely different. In this case with rc we're still with cars, and rc cars usually have 1 motor for throttle and one servo. Other things are additional and are done similarly. Let's say we're making better PF system:) Most flexible way to do that in my opinion is just having rc components packed in Lego compatible boxes separately. Like 4*3*2 box with receiver, similar box with ESC and maybe PF connectors on top. But in this case we're not really user-friendly. It's still tons of wires, but a little bit easier to connect components to the chassis. In this option deck is becoming just an ESC box with Lego compatible connectors which is also nice, but it's a different product with a little different using scenario
  23. NoEXIST
    That's actually right. There's less space on cover of the deck than needed with current setup. As @Ryokeen said, you do not always want to reverse the whole channel, the car I'm using for test uses this feature as well. Also with this setup you can't really make 4 pf ports anyways. Pins that are used for pf ports are going straight down, in case of having 4 ports, contacts have to go through the ESC placed on one of the sides of the deck. And here is the lastest problem, you can't make something suitable for everyone. For this purpose I would just rather choose external receiver. In this case you'll have more wires, but more flexibility with the cannel management. Thanks for your kind words:)
  24. NoEXIST
    Idk if it was said before, but why not to put cylinder in the same position as spring is?
  25. NoEXIST
    Looking forward for this! Custom tires would be really nice! Maybe finally some thin tires
×
×
  • Create New...