.jpeg.85c7049db710c08af0dd544cff51144d.jpeg)
Parazels
-
Posts
206 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Parazels
-
.thumb.jpeg.019d538e6955d37410627e0d5e3cb08d.jpeg)
42111 - Fast & Furious car
Parazels replied to Kaanere's topic in LEGO Technic, Mindstorms, Model Team and Scale Modeling
It's way better, than the white Porsche, which I refused buying even for $80! -
It's better than nothing. I offered them to rerelease classic Lego sets sometimes. I had created a separate poll on Facebook about rereleasing a one classic Lego Technic set once a year and 99% of visitors supported this idea. There were many very positive comments! Also I asked ©grohl to inform his bosses about my poll.
-
I see.
-
It looks very futuristic, almost like Technic cars of late 90s, but I can't shake off the feeling it will be too easy to break those long wishbone arms.
-
Don't build huge models! Increase density of gears to make your models more compact and efficient!
-
It's pleasant to see you recreate some rare vehicles and functions instead of building boring RC cars and cranes! I very appreciate your truck that can move by wheels and tracks!
-
Looks good as far as I can see on the low-res pictures!
-
I found Lego designers didn't use a clutch gear in 42030 set, that also uses an XL-motor for propulsion. So i no longer care of it as long as it's a legal way to build a transmission.
-
https://m.facebook.com/LEGOTechnic/photos/a.147546508964773/1043098446076237/?type=3&comment_id=1043119549407460&notif_t=feedback_reaction_generic&notif_id=1585149920676615&ref=m_notif
-
It didn't work either... So I decided to ignore the 24 clutch gear at all. At least now my revolutionary vehicle has a good speed/power ratio!
-
Two-speed gearbox + several else gears to connect all the stuff!
-
There are XL-motor - gearbox - rear wheels without differential. The XL-motor is more than enough for propulsion the vehicle. Also the vehicle is medium size with high density of mechanics. There is literally no space for other stuff! Maybe, unfortunately, I don't have the new parts yet.
-
Very interesting idea! But now I'm considering setting separate 24 clutch gears on both rear wheels. Now there are two ordinary 24 gears.
-
Hello! Now I'm building a proper motorized vehicle, where an XL-motor drives rear wheels. There is a pretty long drivetrain (it's impossible to make it shorter or avoid), so, I fear, the XL-motor can break the drivetrain, if something accidentally stops both wheels outside. Of course, I have tryied using a 24 clutch gear in different combinations, but it is just slipping, therefore, its torque is not enough to move the whole vehicle. How do you normally solve the problem?
-
Technic 2020 Set Discussion
Parazels replied to dimaks13's topic in LEGO Technic, Mindstorms, Model Team and Scale Modeling
When are the new models scheduled to be released? On April 1st? And no pictures yet?! -
What's under the hood?
-
[C-MODEL] 42094 - Snow Groomer
Parazels replied to Tomik's topic in LEGO Technic, Mindstorms, Model Team and Scale Modeling
Very good job! It's astonishing you managed to apply even schock absorbers! -
I'm not allowed to load photos...
-
I meant medium cylinders, not small. But yes, medium cylinders haven't appeared in sets for many years.
-
The model would have looked complete, if its designer had made the boom horizontal. Also it would have let him set a front vertical pier and as a result prevent the superstructure from spinning while driving.
-
Your wheels are very, very flimsy. That's because you are not using wheel hubs. Also if I'm not mistaken, the pneumatic cylinders don't reach their end positions. It feels like you should have used shorter cylinders.
-
Do you really like this "falling" boom? Admit it, a strictly horizontal boom would look much more neat.
-
Actually it looks like a miscalculated angle, not realism like!
-
This is a very good solution, that lets you save valuable space inside chassis, if you use the simplest control scheme. In theory you can even use the solution for subtractor mechanism!