Marvel Superheroes 2016 Rumors And Discussion

[strangely]

Yeah, why can't they just give us the one from the Lego Marvel game? That one looked so good.

Because they'd prefer it if we bought ten of fifteen inferior versions first. At least that seems like what they're doing. It is strange they didn't give it the face it had in the prelims, that face wasn't the same as the Juniors, it was new.

I'm puzzled by these sets ultimately. Why did Lego use the Muppet Babies marketing strategy on these characters? Did we really need Avenger Babies?

[just2good]

Honestly, I'm really liking the wacky faces. They're super fun.

It adds variation, so it's its own 'thang.

[Marvel_Geek]

Honestly, I'm really liking the wacky faces. They're super fun.

It adds variation, so it's its own 'thang.

Ya the more I look at them the more they grow on me. It will just be difficult to find replacement legs for hulk and goblin. I'm not really excited for these but they will be great parts pack.

[Bricky Dee Williams]

Honestly, I'm really liking the wacky faces. They're super fun.

It adds variation, so it's its own 'thang.

I laughed when I saw Gobby's; I snorted when I saw Hulk!

[Amazing Bricks]

New spiderman! Honestly this is a breath of fresh air seeing this, that looks so much better.

Edited December 16, 2015 by amazingbricks

[Aethersprite]

I won't be getting it, but that Spider-Man is incredible! Great to see some diversity in these sets.

[Numbuh1Nerd]

Bummed by the serious lack of detail in these figures. Looks I should be getting these figures out of a gumball machine. Spidey's head looks like it might be useful outside of the sets for expressions like in Ultimate Spider-Man, but Gobby's useless and I can't imagine any use for Hulk's torso. These sets seemed to be only all that great for minifig parts and now that doesn't even seem to be the case. I guess they look kinda cute in their own right, at least, but now I've gotta buy Green Goblin in that Juniors set :(

[Robert8]

Ha!

Those anime-styled faces are really funny.

It's good to see LEGO is trying something different

[Bricky Dee Williams]

New spiderman! Honestly this is a breath of fresh air seeing this, that looks so much better.

Yes, his face is very nice! The winking eye is a very nice print!

[LegoPercyJ]

I like the new spidy face print as well. It adds variation, and, as someone said, would be sooooo useful for brickfilming.

[Neomars]

To quote Cassie from Ant Man "It's so ugly. I love it!"

[Bricky Dee Williams]

It adds variation, and, as someone said, would be sooooo useful for brickfilming.

Oh, I hadn't even thought of that!

[agoodfella77]

Not sure about the other figs, but that Spidey head is awesome!

[Monkey Joe]

Well those pics are disappointing. I was excited to have the chance to pick up a couple figures for $10. Not now.

[strangely]

I will end up buying that Spider-man one at least, the head is just too useful not too. I kind of wish they'd been doing different expressions all along for him.

Really for mocing purposes these aren't bad. They look like kids in costumes, so I'm guessing next Halloween AFOL's will be using these in their mocs.

I am looking forward to see the others revealed.

Edited December 16, 2015 by strangely

[megafpf5k]

148 pages in so I couldn't really verify if this was brought up... is it possible that the Iron Man in the Juniors set is the same Iron man from 6869??? If so that would be great for me and horrible for those selling them on ebay for $25

[Chimp]

I need deadpool with spidey's expression like NOW! They must have considered this.

[agoodfella77]

148 pages in so I couldn't really verify if this was brought up... is it possible that the Iron Man in the Juniors set is the same Iron man from 6869??? If so that would be great for me and horrible for those selling them on ebay for $25

Well the torso definitely looks like the Mark 7 variant. Not sure about the legs without a full pic...

[benderisgreat]

148 pages in so I couldn't really verify if this was brought up... is it possible that the Iron Man in the Juniors set is the same Iron man from 6869??? If so that would be great for me and horrible for those selling them on ebay for $25

it's already been said a couple of times, Lego decided to give us old Mk7 version of Iron Man for cheap. And it's great! Edited December 16, 2015 by LuxorV

[Dr.Cogg]

That hulk head would probably look better on Beast Boy.

[Ultron]

That hulk head would probably look better on Beast Boy.

Too bad the greens do not match up.

[kevkipo]

Wait if Luiggi has March 2016 Racers already...

Does he have CIVIL WAR!?

[N_Cat]

Wait if Luiggi has March 2016 Racers already...

Does he have CIVIL WAR!?

I doubt it; the security on the Mighty Micros has been pretty lax, so us getting pictures of figures months early isn't that surprising. The Civil War sets have had much tighter security by comparison— we don't even know the full figure lineup for certain. Though I hope very much that I'm wrong, of course. I would love to see Falcon and the rest as much as any of you!

[Winter Soldier]

Best images of the Silver Centurion: http://minifigpriceguide.com/wordpress/silver-centurion-iron-man-5002946-parts/

[J.V.D.]

My kids are disappointed... when I showed them some weeks ago the prelim pictures of the Mighty Micros they were excited though;

finally some "real Lego" super hero sets / figures, and we all know it is mainly about the figures, within pocket money reach!

But this was not what they expected.. to AFOLS those figs might look cute, funny, a fresh approach,.. my 10-ish year olds find them just stupid..

Another won battle for the bootleggers I guess..