Fallenangel

While I too would take a better set over a fancy box, I think it would be neat if The LEGO Group were to use textured print for exclusive sets only.

Maybe.

Simply put, StoutFiles has absolutely no idea what you are talking about - and to be honest, neither do I.

I recall having made LEGO picture frames for our family photos as a child. It wasn't anything elaborate, but they did look nice. I also have a small LEGO stand holding up my crappy Revell X-wing kit.

To my knowledge, all that is certain is that the second Death Star was considerably larger than the first.

Eh, I'm sure KielDaMan or KimT will be glad to move this... Wasn't it implied in Sith that Plagueis created Anakin using the Force? EDIT: Wookieepedia appears to agree with me:

It serves as an indicator that people actually put some care into their posts, and this is especially important on sites like Eurobricks where people share MOCs. Besides, on an online forum, wouldn't you want to voice your opinion as clearly as possible?

I concur. In fact, I'm surprised that someone hasn't merged this with the other thread yet.

'Am' denotes past tense? Eh, I'm sure there are lots of underage members here... @phil skycrawler: I second the Mario Bros. line... we need some of these in LEGO.

Ah. While I can see where that's coming from, I would have to agree with you; furthermore, since they are typically neither generic (e. g. Scout Trooper) nor 'core' characters (e. g. Anakin) one would expect bounty hunters to show up only in larger sets as an added incentive to buy the set.

Say again?

Don't forget MB (Mega Bloks)... Speaking of themes, it's occurred to me that many terms commonly used in the Star Wars Forum such as BP (Battle Pack), TCW (The Clone Wars), and RGS (Republic Gunship) are also absent from the Glossary. The same can be said for SSD (Super Star Destroyer) and ISD (Imperial Star Destroyer). Perhaps BL (Bricklink), BS (Brickshelf), FBTB (From Bricks to Bothans), and TBB (The Brothers Brick) should be added as well, since they are mentioned quite frequently on these boards...

I don't suppose anyone else listens to this group?

Perhaps you could provide us a picture of your Chrome Vader? I think that a visual of what you're talking about, even from a camera with poor quality, might help clarify what the issue is.

Eta-5s? Those shouldn't be around yet... Oh, you mean Eta-2...from what I can make out, the ones in the screenshot bear a strong resemblance to the one from 7661, so I wouldn't expect much difference in a future release.

I had always been under the impression that Brian Tobin's and Bruce Lowell's speeders were far smaller than the stock sets, but you're right...

Any chance of replacing the T-47s? In my opinion the stock sets look too big in the base, though that may be due to the compactness of the latter.

I'll be honest - when I started playing the video and saw the tiny red machine, I thought you were trolling all of us. But to see the Technic monstrosity behind it! This is most impressive - I am very much awaiting pictures...

Looking at the studio model, there do seem to be portions of the ship that exhibit a shade of cream; however, film footage suggests that the Lambda-class was intended to be grayish in hue. As for whether the bricks themselves were supposed to be cream, I think Aanchir might know something...

Hmm...

An interesting proposal. But how would that work for those who wish to join but have difficulty understanding English?

Speaking of the skull sticker, is there actually a source that depicts the Slave I with a skull print on its canopy or is it just artistic license? It doesn't seem to be present on the studio model...

What else*? *Actually, I just collect them in a bag and wait to give it out to friends with children. But burning them wouldn't be a bad idea either. =p

I want to say the second exclusive set for this year...

Wow, and I thought was long...