Hinckley

My heart hasn't started beating again yet since I read Mr. Vaughn's response.

Vote: Sebastien Vaughn/Shadows if for no other reason at this point, but for calling me naughty names. Shame on you Mr. Vaughn. I'm more than happy to unvote if we come up with a stronger strategy or different theories. I hope Mr. Vaughn hasn't run off for good.

To be honest, I was surprised Sebastien voted along with Dacius and I so quickly. I had similar thoughts to yours. If I'm wrong? We all have the power and responsibility to vote. I don't mind being the spokesperson for those with night activities. But, if you vote for someone, that is your responsibility. We're in this together. If I'm not trusted to lead, then I'll just tell people what the night results are and leave my theories out of it. But, for now, I'm representing the village and trying to protect them. You're hardly in a position to get on a high horse about trust. Last I checked, you're one of the least trusted people. Maybe tomorrow I will be one of the least trusted people, but I really am doing what I'm doing with the best of intentions for the village. I apologize if I'm hurting anybody's feelings. Your vote is your own. Do with it what you feel best. But, Mr. Sinclair, don't cast a vote for someone and expect me to take full responsibility for it. We should be working and investigating together. Not just following me and then blaming me if I'm wrong. If somebody has a feeling about the investigation or that we're doing the wrong thing, it's their responsibility to speak up about it. Despite the emotions, let's not forget that there is an investigation result implicating Sebastien Vaughn as evil. I didn't make that up. It's a lead worth investigating. And it's up to all of us to figure out how we want to investigate it.

Take it personally much? In this case, do not shoot the messenger. These are the results of several people's investigations and the results from another night action. I would not have brought the case forward had several people not agreed that it was the best idea. Everyone has the option of not voting you and there are three protectors that can protect you if they end up believing you. So you can either help us all out by discussing the results Gary Coleman got investigating you or you call me a drama queen, a stupid bitch, completely retarded and act like a child throwing a tantrum. If I weren't protecting the identities of those I trusted I would ask them to verify that I even made sure to step back due to our history in other games...of life. It's about 10 minutes before we're allowed to vote. Due to your tantrum, I find it completely reasonable to keep my vote where I originally intended it. And one more bit of advice: relax.

I think he should check the ex-werewolf bodyguard first...

In the long run, you weren't investigated. Bambi was the target of Sebastien's supposed investigation.

I'm a slut not a theater historian.

I believe your mother approves. She's my sister of Cleavage, don't you know? All excellent points. I just was letting the stress get to me. Sorry dear Ruben. Shall I bend over for you again? Will that make up for everything? That is quite a conundrum of me being a spokesperson for all those with night activity. You are destined to be stuck with what they are telling me. Obviously, more than just the villagers are confiding in me. There's a discrepancy somewhere. I hope all of your trust in me proves beneficial and that the town will survive this ordeal and conquer whatever menace is out there, whatever that may be. Is this another witch hunt? Protagonists Goldilocks-Inventor Evil-Sebastien Vaughn Gary Coleman-investigator Person 1-bodyguard Person 2-limited protector Person 3-follower Person 4-protector Person 5-that's a secret Gojira: also a secret Bambi: Secret Mary Poppins: Julie Andrews Hunter: Vigilante Killer Does that help at all?

Thank you, Quinn. I think you'll have some extra applesauce rubbed on your cock tonight.

Don't try to put the whole burden on me. We're all in the best position because I'm bringing all the information to everyone. My theories will always be attached, but the facts are the same. At least as told to me. This is a somewhat daunting task...

Of course it's not. Do we ever get conclusive evidence? That's why this is a game. We have to figure things out. Perhaps I am biased because I am finding the info, but this does appear to be our best lead. I have no desire to lead everyone astray, so I present the information and my theories to be discussed and help us solve this. By no means, should everything be believed and followed. Trust should not be given lightly in this situation. Please, point out if you think I'm wrong and then take it a step further by discussing what the info I've found could mean.

Raw venison? Werwolf!

Is everyone ready for the morning entertainment? Time for a play, lovelies. Goldilocks and the Big Bad Wolf Evil Scene 1 Join us back in time before this horrible ordeal began at our village's most famous hangout: the Irreverent Raucous Cafe. Goldilocks: I'm the Inventor! There's a horrible ordeal about to befall us where we'll be attacked by werewolves and I'll be the one who makes the silver bullets. Can you believe I have the best duty ever? I'm a badass! Woot! Did everybody hear me? I'm the Inventor! Dacius Nathans: Can you shut up? I don't think so many people should be hearing this, especially you-know-who. Evil: Don't worry, I won't tell a soul. Goldilocks: Oh, good. Thanks. Glad I could trust you guys. I'm a badass inventor! Dacius Nathans: Shut up! Scene 2 Gary Coleman: Hello Harriet. It appears that everyone is confiding in you, so I shall also place my trust in you. Harriet: Gary Coleman! Wait... Aren't you dead? Gary Coleman: It's a pseudonym...to protect my identity. Harriet: Say "What you talkin' bout, werewolf?" Gary Coleman: Fine. What you talkin' bout, werewolf?" Harriet: You're so adorable. My what a big cock you have. I shall rub applesauce on it while you tell me about your night action. Charles Synclair: These jokes are immature. Harriet and Gary: Shut up, vampire! Gary Coleman: I'm the investigator. Harriet: Oh, sweet! We could totally use one. What are you called? Gary Coleman: The Seer. Harriet: Sounds plausible. Gary Coleman: It worries me. "Seeing" sounds like magic, so what if my results are paranoid? Magic isn't really, so what if my investigations are false? Harriet: Don't know, but your concern about it makes me feel comfortable. I'm sure we'll be careful with your powers and your results. Scene 3 Evil: Hello Harriet. I'm the investigator. Harriet: That's redundant. My, what a big cock you have! Evil: All the better to megabluck you with, my dear. Not like that. I meant megabluck you over. Because I'm an evil liar. I'm not a pervert. Harriet: Aw, too bad. Evil romps in the hay are the best. Who did you investigate on the first night? Evil: Goldilocks. She's a villager. Harriet: Interesting. I thought you knew we tested Goldilocks by having her give Dacius Nathans silver bullets. Evil: Yes, but it's good to be doubly sure. Harriet: Sounds like a scummy move, but OK. What are you called? Evil: The Seer. Harriet: Interesting... Scene 4 Enter Harriet with Mary Poppins and Gojira. Mary Poppins: Four protectors and two investigators. What's next? Five factions? Harriet: Don't tempt fate. Mary Poppins: How can we test them. Harriet: We'll have Evil investigate Bambi. Mary Poppins: Good idea. Bambi is most likely innocent. Harriet: And we'll have Gary Coleman investigate evil. Mary Poppins: Great idea. Gojira: RAAAAWRR!!! Mary Poppins: See lizard face? We're even spelling your name right now. Scene 5 Evil: Bambi is a villager. Harriet: Thanks. Evil exits stage left. Person 3: I followed Bambi last night, he was targeted by Person 4 and Evil. Harriet: That makes sense because we asked Person 4 to protect Bambi in case Evil was a killer. Person 3 exits Gray Coleman: I investigated Evil and he's evil. Harriet: Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa? Evil enters stage right. Harriet: How'd you get over there when you left over there? Evil: I'm a demon vampire evil thing. I can do that. Harriet: Your name is Sebastien Vaughn. Evil: I know my name. Harriet: I just wanted everyone else to know your name too. It's Sebastien Vaughn. Evil: I know, it's Sebastien Vaughn. I am Sebastien Vaughn so I know my name is Sebastien Vaughn. Harriet: All right Sebastien Vaughn, you don't have to say your name, Sebastien Vaughn, so many times, Sebastien Vaughn. Furthermore, Sebastien Vaughn said he was planning on investigating Charles Synclair last night before we tested him on Bambi. I found it odd that he would offer to investigate someone who so many villagers were already suspicious of. So, this is our theory. I think voting out Sebastien Vaughn today would be the boldest move in finding out who is lying behind the scenes. I believe Gary Coleman is telling the truth. He is suspicious of his own results and wants to be certain that he is correct in his findings and not an insane person. I trust him more than Sebastien because he is obviously going for results. Sebastien chose two targets on his own that were odd choices in my opinion. He hasn't contributed much to our search and if we convict him and he turns up guilty, we know Gary Coleman is our investigator. Furthermore, we know that Gary's other investigations were correct. If Sebastien turns out to be a villager, we will know that either Gary Coleman has been lying to us, or that he's insane and his other investigations were the opposite results than what he got. Please, don't tell me there's a random investigator or a framer... There we have it. That's what info our night activity brought us. I'm pretty sure that's everything we could possibly know right now. Phew, I'm tired. I need a nap. One last tidbit. Sebastien didn't actually tell me he was our investigator. Goldilocks told me that he claimed to be the investigator and he was pissed when I called him out on it. I know who I'll be voting today when the time comes. Let me add one more detail. Gary Coleman is very specific about how his action work whereas Sebastien just says "Bambi is a villager." There are a lot of details into how God has given them their ability and Gary's story is more convincing. Is Sebastien an actual Seer? Person 3 says he targeted Bambi. With multiple factions, scum having an investigator makes sense. Or could he be covering up another night action just to make Goldilocks trust him?

If there was one player who knew Zed was a werewolf, why wouldn't there be another one? There's still the possibility that Charles knew Zed was a werewolf and wanted him around. His player is too suspicious to just call him innocent. And just because someone is blocked doesn't make them innocent. The kill action can be swapped amongst scum and there are vanilla scum with no night actions. And we have a player claiming that their role is immunity to vampire bites. That would be a bit useless if there weren't vampires. I'm not sure what you're claiming we should do next, Mr. Peers, but assuming Charles is innocent and that there are no vampires seems foolishly conclusive. You are either naive or scummy.

Hooray! Congratulations and I'm glad to hear everyone's in good health! How is your wife feeling after the C-section? Thanks for keeping us informed and I'm so happy to hear everything is working out for the best!

You're always keeping me stuffed with cock. Thanks Ruben. You're so thoughtful. And you have the plumpest cock!

This is very clever deduction on your part. This player is a bodyguard and has certain stipulations in his action similar to what you have proposed, but different.

Shut your mouth. You're dead.

You didn't believe in werewolves, but you believe in vampires? You've left marks on my neck before... kinky perv! So, what did you see with your own eyes? Am I missing something? Where did that come from?

Person 3 has more than been confirmed as honest. I'm waiting to pass on the results from that night activity. Person 5 is also more than been confirmed. His night activity was helpful. I can't tell you why. Sorry. Someone has contacted me about my "flip-flop" on Charles Synclair. Don't assume that he is one with a night action or one of the persons in my play. I would be happy convicting him today. The suspicion that arose on the first day still remains. He is not likely a werewolf but could have evil intentions towards the village. Some of his behavior today makes me still grow suspicious of him...

Charles Synclair's guilt makes the most sense if there are still werewolves out there. My suspicions were based on his reactions to Zed's death. If Zed was the only werewolf, then Charles has no other reason to defend him other than he was misguided. Or he's another faction that wanted the werewolf to survive. Mr. Sinclair's actions on the first day were highly suspect and I still don't understand why he was so determined to defend Zed, but willing to rational discuss the guilt of others. I stand by my play and the way Charles's own actions implicate himself. But, in light of another faction, my group of trusted advisors took the best shot in the dark we could. It was wrong. I'm sorry. Now that we have confirmed The Hunter, we won't be making any irrational decisions like we did last night. That was person 2. One more thing about Charles Synclair: Our blocker claims to have blocked him last night. So we know he is not the sword killer, unless the vampires have more than one killer. Why would vampires stab someone and leave them though? Vampires drink people's blood. Is there a vampire converting people out there? Did this game...of life start with one werewolf and one vampire and they were just supposed to try to gain as many numbers as they could? There have been no supernatural deaths at night.

No, they claim only to have worked for Zed but wasn't an actual werewolf. Specifically "I don't transform into anything." We asked him to protect someone on Night 1 and we had confirmation that he targeted the person we asked him to. We asked him again to protect someone last night and that person is still alive...though it doesn't look like anybody went after the person we protected, if this person had sinister intent I would assume the person we told them we thought was important enough to protect would've been attacked. Charles, if you could read, you would see that this person fears they would come up as a werewolf. However, since this was not an edict from God, just an assumption on Person 1's part, I do believe we should investigate... True. See my above reply to Charles as well. It is odd you mentioned this because somebody did contact me in private about vampires playing a part in their history as told to them by God. Very fascinating indeed. Let's have a private apple-sauce rubbing/licking session conversation about this... The musket-killer is The Hunter from my play. ... I was the one who asked him to kill Raleigh. I take full responsibility for that. I spoke with Mary Poppins and Godzilla about it and we agreed he was a good target. How we killed Raleigh by Harriet Clive Harriet: So, this Hunter has a hell of a story. We should test him or her to see if he/she is telling the truth and if he/she is loyal to us. Mary Poppins: Well who should we kill? Harriet: If there are no werewolves, it's like the game is starting over again. Mary Poppins: Well, let's look at the people who were pushing for Charles's conviction. Perhaps the more vocal opponents were another faction trying to sway votes towards a villager. Harriet: Time Zones. We don't have much time until the Hunter goes to sleep. Mary Poppins: Well, there are three players who are playing like they normally (metagame, metagame, metagame) but Raleigh is playing exactly like he did in Blood (metagame, metagame, metagame). Harriet: I didn't notice that, but come to think of it, in Bloodbrick he was (metagame, metagame, metagame) so I guess he's as good a target as any. I hate to do this when the Insane lost days to investigate our theories in Bloodbrick because we killed so many (metagame, metagame, metagame). But we do need to test The Hunter. And flying that far under the radar is dangerous. We can never tell where he's at. Mary Poppins: So have him kill Raleigh? Harriet: I guess so. Godzilla: RAWR! (Curtain) So, sorry about Raleigh, folks. It was my fault. Although Godzilla's RAWR was very convincing. I think Persons 1 and 4 both protected you on Night 1. Who else's cock should we eat? Do you want us to eat your cock? See my play above for the rationale. No, it would be a miller type role, I guess. So he appears as a werewolf to an investigator but is actually pro-town/village. I think investigating him or her is the best bet. (I keep using him because it's just easier, not because anybody is male or female...or Gojira.) Correct. Also correct. Person 4 targeted who he or she said he or she did on the first night. I assume the same goes for last night, but it doesn't appear the person we had protected was even attacked.

I don't understand why this person would put themselves out there so far, when I can't understand why it would've been necessary. We have it confirmed that he/she targeted the person they said they would and that target is still alive. We have the Hunter corroborating that the werewolves are done. It doesn't seem like a good place to focus our vote today. I hope we will be getting more solid evidence towards somebody else in the village as more info comes in. I still find your behavior on day one suspicious and it could still indicate sinister intent. I don't think you're off the hook enough to go pointing the finger at anybody else.

Thank you. I made a good case for Charles Synclair yesterday. This information we've learned does one of two things for Mr. Synclair: 1. It exonerates him. We judged him by his defense of Jed. If there are no more werewolves, then Mr. Synclair can't be one. And his defending of Zed was just misguided. 2. It gets him killed. If we want to find out if there are more werewolves, he's the most likely suspect. If we convict him and he turns out to be a werewolf, we know the other two were lying to me... It is possible that he's part of a faction that wanted the werewolves around... So I guess that's three possibilities. I can still count!

Me too! But an investigator confirmed a villager for us. I can't reveal that info or the evil factions would go after this confirmed villager. So, that is good news. I can tell you who not to vote for if the vote turns that way. The other information about who a certain person targeted last night doesn't make sense until I talk to some more people. Thanks for your patience...and trust.