Hinckley

This response has me so worried. I think this is such a huge jump in logic. I'm trying to figure out how the mind of a scum would see this differently from the mind of a villager. Anybody help me out here? I think it was so obvious that I was joking, but Fiona thinks I'm trying to make her the target of the sword killer... Hmmmm... Am I stretching to think this makes her scummy? I've never been as sick as I am right now, so my brain isn't functioning. I'm considering changing my vote to Fiona over this statement...

Yes.

Maybe we should kill you anyway...

That's a mountain of wishful thinking. I hope you're right, but until any of us have heard from the sword killer, it's best to assume they mean us harm. The musket killer is communicating with us and working to find scum. The sword killer took out Beatrice who was proven to be a villager and we don't know why he or she decided to do that. And Fiona jammed a pickaxe up her koochie.

Since the sword killer is killing indiscriminately I would imagine he or she is a serial killer. It would be a huge relief to hear that he or she is indeed a vigilante. If the sword killer doesn't trust me to tell me they're the sword killer, fine, but I can certainly tell him or her who to avoid! But, hopefully he or she will continue to take out the Rogues. Trust me or not, take out those Rogues. Come on Charles, pay attention. When did I ever suggest the sword killer was a Rogue?

Who's we? The sword killer has taken out Daniel and Beatrice, a Rogue and a Villager. The pickaxe killer has taken out two villagers. What are you trying to do? Get people to believe that the past happened differently than it did?

Charles and I were talking and wondering why the sword killer didn't show up on Night One? Was he blocked? The blocker I know of blocked Adam Sokern. Did the scum block him or her? Did he or she not have the power to kill yet? Was this killer awakened after the werewolf was killed? Anybody have any insight into this? The sword killer has struck every night since. Why not the first night? Perhaps he or she just needed a little sword lesson first?

We've spoken. He didn't have much to say in his defense, only what he's said here. He's busy and he doesn't have much more to contribute. It's dangerous to play these games...of life with that attitude because the town won't know what to make of your apathy until you are dead.

No, you didn't vote for him, but you vocally supported the conviction before voting was open. Good way to play both sides.

Arianna, was it OK for me to answer there?

I do remember that yesterday, Quinn, Phillip and Archibald Rynne were very quick to agree with the findings of the play. This could be seen as supsicious now, knowing what we know. Very rare for Quinn to say anything, yet he was right on board with lynching Sebastien...

Sorry, Sister of Slutdom, I didn't realize there was an order in which we were allowed to speak...

I made a joke earlier that if we caught Quinn masturbating again, we'd confiscate his pickaxe. Phillip must have taken me literally...

If I knew he had taken it, don't you think I'd have been a bit more vocal about it? No, I do not know that he's taken it. It is my best guess that he is up to something at night.

Zed described his night action as "I go around and night and kind of follow people. It's complicated and hard to explain..." I wasn't convinced. And he had a very little cock.

No, we can because I have been poking around behind the scenes to find out why the quiet ones have been quiet. Most of the quiet ones have good explanations whereas Quinn just kind of shrugs and says "I'm too busy." Just because people aren't active in the main room of the mansion doesn't mean they aren't working hard behind the scenes to route out the scum. As far as Charles goes, I think I said it quite clearly and I'd like to do my best to be subtle about the importance of what he can do, but please trust me when I say it's an action we can't lose. Last night a member of the village corrected a huge mistake we made. Charles has the ability to similarly correct a mistake and give us more time to find the scum. Don't make me say it again. And let's not draw any more attention to it.

Kill the demon seed! Vote: Quinn Synclair/Quarryman A villager who can't help us, hurts us. I don't think Porky Pig would shoot at random. I think any decision about who to shoot would be reached with reason.

All I've got is that Fiona hid the pickaxe in her koochie and Quinn is too quiet.

Well, I'm not going to blow you too. I'm a slut, not a whore.

Well, I may as well blow the whole family. Let's go talk in private... My jaw hurts. Well, that's enough private talks. I supposed it's best to just say this out loud so nobody votes for the sodder. Everybody already knows he has a night action, so we'll have to protect him anyway. You remember how somebody corrected our mistake of killing Sebastien? Well, Charles can similarly save us from making a mistake. We do not want to lose him. Let's focus on someone else to vote out. And Charles is hung. Like a horse, I meant. Not like lynched. He has a very long penis. That's what I was saying.

Charles, dear. Ignore them for now. Let's have a focused talk in private. I'll help you relax and we can figure this whole thing out. Charles is a devilishly fiendish man with incredibly busy hands that found their way to my unmentionable areas...but in a good way. I believe Charles means to be a true help to our village. He may not be the best at strategy or at making friends, or have any fashion sense, but he does mean well. How do you like that? It's a good thing I'm already pregnant. We'll definitely talk later Charles, over some cock.

I say we have him investigate you and then kill you tomorrow whatever the result. Or just kill you today. Seriously. Are you suggesting we vote out two confirmed villagers? We know Gary Coleman is an insane investigator. God be damned if we had two insane investigators. And The Baron is a villager and the Blacksmith. We saw him give silver bullets to Dacius Nathans on Day 1. He was trying to help the village by giving silver bullets to someone he believed to be the hunter! He's clearly a villager. And if he's a villager then I suppose the other person Sebastien investigated was too. So which one of our confirmed fellow villagers would you like to see dead? You like the taste of your foot? Would you prefer some applesauce to go with it? Sebastien Vaughn was proven to be a villager when we killed him. He gave us correct results on two villagers. We knew he was testing the second villager, we asked him to, to test him. He's been brought back from the dead by someone who realized it was a mistake to kill him and wants to continue to help the village. We'd be fools to not consider that ressurection and robed chanting is evil, but to take it as far as to suggest we kill a confirmed villager... Off with your head, Charles Synclair. Evil or loyal, you are no help to us. I do think we should investigate Sebastien tonight to make sure he's not a zombie-poo-flinging-space-bunny, but until then nobody should lay a finger on him! He's my baby daddy!

Even though Zombie Sebastien is the father of my baby, I can understand being suspicious of him. But insinuating he had the energy to kill anyone after being dead all night is pretty silly. But, your theories do bring up another possibility: What if there's a faction of flesh-eating-bunnies from outer space that can animate our poo to kill us? I know I won't be taking a shit for the rest of this ordeal! Mostly, I see a desperate attempt to shift focus away from himself. He can't give us any reason why we should trust him, but he has no problem discussing why others shouldn't be trusted. Doesn't have much of a defense and offers little to the town, but can easily attack others with even the wildest theories of poo-flinging-space-bunnies.

That is too true. It doesn't mean that it doesn't apply to you. It only means it didn't apply to Adam Sokern.

And Quinn, if you're caught masturbating again, your father's going to confiscate that pickaxe!