Hinckley

I'm glad you like it. I think I need to make it brighter though. Congratulations. It's a unique one. You should be the only one with it for some time.

Does anybody have the night action of "slip garlic into the dinner?"

If Mr. Vaughn could've been as calm in his last response as he was his first, we'd probably have a different ending to today. It's important to stay rational in situations like this because lashing out and insulting people never helps. In addition to the lie about contacting the Baron, Mr. Vaughn also claimed that Mr. Baron's ability was not referred to as The Inventor. He say The Baron used another title when describing it to him. A few hours later, he was trying to tell me he had never heard the Baron proclaim his role. In private, Mr. Vaughn has thrown more insults and anger my way without trying to resolve anything. I gave him a couple possible strategies besides insulting everyone. He told me he had the whole situation figured out, I of course am just too stupid to see it myself. So I told him to postulate a theory of who was scum and we could talk more if they were the same people that implicated him. He wasn't interested in "guessing." So I told him to take his fantastic theories and post about them in the mansion. If they were plausible, people would unvote him. He said he didn't have the game figured out, he had me figured out. It's a shame he never said "Hey, person 3 can see who targets a person. Since the scum is likely to block me now. Protect me and have person 3 watch me so that we can find out who their blocker is." Wouldn't that have been brilliant? But no, we just got maniacal ravings and lies, sprinkled with insults. Trying to work with the village would've made a difference. By his own actions, he doesn't seem interested in helping us. If he was on our side, he would've thought of this on his own. He is probably not and couldn't come up with a valid village strategy. I feel confident we're making a good choice. If Sebastien turns up innocent, we will certainly have other leads to follow. And we won't have to hear the insults and arrogance any longer.

72 hours seems to be the most fair for everybody to get as many people involved as possible. Even if a conviction is reached after 48 hours, it's still fair to give that remaining time to the person convicted to try and turn it around. That's my opinion.

Those are all possibilities. Way to think, Philip. Can I interest you in some apple pie?

True. And don't forget, My Little Pony is claiming that God told him he's immune to vampire bites. That would be useless for God to waste his breath on that unless there was a vampire out there somewhere.

Gladly! Oh... ... You prematurely applesauced on my dress...

Why is your focus on me? I just presented the findings. The evidence itself is pointing towards you. The villagers are reaching their own conclusion. We're working together to piece together what we have. Please do. I'd be happy to have any opportunity to prove that I am trustworthy. Mr. Vaughn, please stop contacting me in private. I don't put out for people who can't control their anger.

That is a great point. I see Arianna has already answered to it. In conversations I've had with the Baron, Mr. Vaughn has not been in content with him either. But, hopefully, we will hear from the Baron soon.

Correct. This is why I added it to the play. So it would show that Mr. Vaughn had knowledge of Goldilocks's innocence. Incorrect. At the time, we all assumed we would be fighting multiple werewolves. This scene is set in the past before we realized (actually, theorized-it's not proven at this point) we were only up against one. If that were true, we shouldn't even mention it in public. But now that it has been mentioned, that is a good idea to keep him protected. Not to mention, Dacius was testing her by asking her to give him bullets on night one. Since the plan to test her that way came up in the IRC (Irreverent Raucous Cafe) I assume Mr. Vaughn could've overheard that as well. Not to mention, Goldilocks was somewhat of a blabberpuss before this ordeal started. And yes, all of this information was gained before the death of Dacius Nathans.

Are you Swedish?

Sorry, Philip. No. He claims to have investigated Goldilocks on night one. He claims to have investigated Bambi on Night two. As Goldilocks says in my play, she is The Inventor.

Gary Coleman's investigation on Night One of Strawberry Shortcake revealed that she was "innocent" and "village." These are the two words he used to describe the results in our discussions. I have asked for clarification on what the exact results were and will report back when I hear from him. Gary Coleman can't be paranoid or naive because he's gotten two different results on the first two night. Only two people knew Sebastien was going to be investigated besides Gary Coleman: Mary Poppins and Gojira.

Of course people should still be suspicious of me. We shouldn't be trusting anybody fully. Asking questions like Pete just has is the type of behavior that will keep the village safe. After Mr. Vaughn has thrown a colossal fit, targeted two villagers for death and blatantly lied, I'm more convinced than ever that he is up to no good. I do wish there were another way to prove it, as if I'm misreading his rantings, I'd hate to be wrong in this case, in particular. But nothing he has done has helped us and he was lying pretty well dormant until now. I've done more than bring down the werewolf. I've brought forward information about possible vampires. I've brought information that there was only on werewolf in order to ensure the town is focusing on the right menace. Wouldn't someone with sinister intent try to keep all this information hidden and keep the villagers confused? Honestly, without this information, how unsure of what we're up against would everyone be? Testing an investigator could take up to three days to prove insane/random/framer interference. Mr. Vaughn's actions are more than suspicious and we have an investigator's result that he is up to evil. If we need to test all of the theories, unfortunately, Mr. Vaughn seems the most likely place to focus. I don't believe Mr. Vaughn's defense of "No, you're scum" is a very good one. And he has put two other members of the village in grave danger. And Peter, the villager in question with the night action is not blonde. Anybody can see that. She is not even a woman. And if someone couldn't infer from the play and Mr. Vaughn's declaration of his supposed results, it is still not my doing that the role was revealed in the first place. Good point about the bullets, though. They aren't needed anymore. So, it seems you have moved on to fully believing that the werewolves are gone. You believe me about that but question my intentions about other things? That is fine, we should remain ever vigilant.

And I have told you nothing. Any insinuation that I have is a complete lie. I feel much more confident that you are scum when you make things up like this. I'm protecting the identities of those who I trust and believe. I wouldn't reveal them to anyone, especially you, who I trust the least.

You are dense. I wrote a play about a person with a night action revealing their night action to Sebastien. In the same play, Sebastien investigated that person. I called him Goldilocks. Sebastien has now told everybody the name of the person he investigated. Anyone who can put 2 and 2 together, so I guess you're not included in this, Charles, could see that Sebastien revealed the identity of the Inventor. Do you need a diagram for that?

The identity was protected by me until Sebastian revealed who he supposedly investigated... So, no, I didn't reveal anything that Mr. Vaughn hadn't already revealed.

1. Stop metagaming. 2. If you tell all the villagers to trust, the scum will target them at night. They need to outnumber us and why not get rid of the ones people know to be villagers? Scum want to cause confusion and they need to make the innocent look guilty. If you prove someone's innocent, the scum is more likely to go after them. Because then we don't know who to trust. They want us not to know who to trust... 3. Not only did you reveal villagers, you revealed (if everyone can pick up from the plays) one with a night action. You gave the scum targets to kill at night because now they have people who are known to the villagers to be trusted. See how that works? When the village trusts somebody, if they lose them, it's bad for the villagers. The scum will try to get rid of the most trusted players. You can't be that dense that you don't understand that? I'm not sure how else I could re-phrase it to try to get through to you. Do you need me to explain how outing someone with a night action is bad for the village? Shall I draw you pictures? There has to be some remedial way to get though to you. So, I guess the "good job, moron" should actually be re-directed at you. Go ahead. Take it. You truly deserve it.

If the investigator who claims Vaughn is evil turns out to be incorrect, of course their identity would come out. And if I didn't reveal it, there are three other people who know the identity of the other investigator and would not let me get away without revealing it. I am working diligently to make sure I don't repeat the mistakes of past lives and ensuring that with this setup of me representing the others, there are still checks and balances so I don't have all the power. If Mr. Vaughn were convicted and turned out to be innocent and I didn't reveal the true accuser, I would expect to be lynched myself. Don't forget, I did catch Zed in a slip-up that lead to the successful conviction of a werewolf on the first day and potentially saved many of us from being turned into or killed by werewolves. I have clearly demonstrated that I have the best interest of the village at heart. Mr. Vaughn does not appear to, in my opinion. But nobody was suspicious of either one of them before. Truly, you can't be stupid enough to think people won't see that you gave the scum two targets by revealing them.

Giving up is so helpful for the town. Cock.

No. I do not believe that is possible. I know that both of his targets are indeed, villagers. If you follow the plays, you can figure out why... This means that if Vaughn was truly interested in the well-being of the village, he wouldn't have revealed these results. There was no reason to. It only puts the two people he investigated in danger. How would he know they were villagers if he's not an investigator? Well, one person told him their night action and if he is scum, he knows who is innocent since he knows all of the members of the scum team. Perhaps he investigates to find other factions, perhaps he is actually a framer. I don't know. I still don't know if Gary Coleman is right. But, these are where my instincts are and they match the opinions of those behind the scenes who I trust. Until we can test, definitively, any of these claims, I will not be revealing the identities of the villagers who fight evil, or claim to, at night.

I do hope then when Mr. Vaughn returns he can explain why he chose to reveal the findings of his investigation on the two villagers. Were their affiliations in question? I do not believe so. Did he just potentially reveal two targets to the scum? Yes, he did. Is Sebastien Vaughn acting in the best interest of the village? No, he is not. It will be hard for me to change my vote considering these actions of Mr. Vaughn. The tantrum doesn't change the findings of those with night activity and Mr. Vaughn's behavior seems to back up the findings. I am not sure if I'm right, but I'm making the best decision with the information I have. I hope people will see that if Mr. Vaughn is convicted and turns out innocent. Furthermore, does Mr. Vaughn expect anybody to believe that he is the type of person to do whatever I say? He says he tested Arianna just because I asked him to, but if he had so many reasons to investigate Charles, why didn't he tell me his plan or explain how it would've benefited the village? I didn't tell Mr. Vaughn who to investigate, I asked and he willingly agreed with no argument. These are not the actions of a man with the village's best interests at heart.

There is no indication of what faction, just that he is an evil-doer and means to cause harm to the village. Other people's night actions mentioned "evil-doers." That is the only information we have.

Votes will be tallied and winners announced by tomorrow evening. (about 24 hours from now.)

Votes will be tallied and winners announced by tomorrow evening. (about 24 hours from now.)