Starwars4J

Don't be sorry, this is what the forum is here for!

It's called an idiom error ;-) That is considered by the literary community, for all intents and purposes, to be a grammatical error.

Who's on first That aside, I have no idea what hinckley's talking about anymore *wacko*

I'd like to see someone over the age of 10 who actually says "I could care less" seriously...I use that example when I teach highschool kids, and THEY all know the correct way of saying it. It's no great mystery..."I could care less" is just grammatically wrong...

Actually they knew of the conditions and iceberg beforehand, but the message was ignored by the captain. They knew it was coming, the captain just didn't think it was a real threat... That too X-D

Done :-)

Wrong coast...

I'm confused...then why'd you start this topic? *wacko*

You have to remember that the ease of chuckage comes into play. Which is easier for YOU to chuck? A chair, or the weight of a chair in pillows? The pillows should be more difficult, due to larger physical size, and relative difficulty in handling compared to the chair. Not to mention wind resistance.

But that still makes no sense. A woodchuck can chuck wood? Great! Does that mean it can chuck another woodchuck? No. But assuming it could chuck another woodchuck, how would we base it on? Even the original quote "How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood" makes no sense, since you have no way of telling. You'd need the rate of chuckage (the Ca). The ability to chuck does not inherently give any means to find the rate. The quote SHOULD read (to make any sense): Filling in x and n of course. Even comparing the chucking rate of wood to the ability to chuck woodchucks yields nothing, as if I know the rate at which I could chuck marbles, that doesn't give me a clue as to my car-chucking rate.

For them I've noticed extremely fast shipping, but the whole 6 month thing for feedback kind of annoys me...

Well you talked about there being less animation, fewer FPS, etc.

*wub* Jinzo :-D But i have to ask if the title of this was misspelled on purpose, as in the interview, or if it was a mistake 8-|

Hope you enjoy it Doc! ;-) richly deserved

Er, but the poll is about what you think the smaller guys should be called, which you said, in your opinion...is orc *wacko*

Because we want to piss everyone off, duh :-| I'm sure it just has to do with testing and whatnot. Hey, you guys wanted something afterall :-P

Yeah, the Supernova was the only one so far that I liked, I still have it assembled. I loved the technique used for the friction in the wrist, and I think it was the first EF mech to include fingers

I thought I recognized a few of his typing styles, but I didn't think he was a member of FBTB! :-D Looks like EB members took both spots X-D

I love anime mecha...I just don't like the horrid building in EF sets :-X Thank god the '08 line somewhat rectifies that...

To be honest the FBTB quote also looked like *yoda*s style of typing, but probably isn't ;-) That wasn't the most positive comment either...would've been nice to have some other quote but eh, at least they're looking X-D

Man, you must be on the cheap burial plan if they leave the stabbing knife in you! Great set as always, Brickster! Love the yellow glowing eyes effect on the bat, and the happy white-picket-fence for a cemetery :-D It really matches the feel of the rest of your line well! My only suggestion would be to make the lighting a little less harsh, so it looks like evening or something *y*

It's a coloring book? Wait no...stationary...so it's blank pages with multicolored pencils? If you're going for stationary, why the multicolors? It's like they got lazy and didn't figure out what kind of product they were making

No mech is a plus at this point :-P Porous building? For a little playset it's fantastic :-$ As for the flying GUN I hate it too, but it's just such a fun little set compared to the rest of EF...especially their other buildings :-$

Moved to Culture &Multimedia Though I do wonder how the graphics got a 9 if you said they were worse (in the obvious aspects you mentioned) than the US SMB2...