aFrInaTi0n

I may want to add my concern for their version looking a little underwhelming - knowing what would be possibly in the smaller scale already + putting a buwizz 3, two buggy motors and a servo in and let it run as RC... (please dont quote my pics in the thread here directly; hope the spoiler helps to not get that much off-track to the set-discussion, otherwise @mods please delete what is needed please)

I have to say some chinese companies are at least doing alternative rim designs - I may better not post a picture but one thing I can tell: a 5-star rim looks soooo much better than the regular motorcycle rim from LEGO.. So yes I would wish for more variety there aswell.

I am not harsh as they are speaking about kicking their app development up since two years but basically NOTHING happened since then. Still waiting for some elemantal functions like a failsafe shutdown for lost connections (its no fun when the connection is lost and your rc model is just further accelerating with 28++ kph into a curb / obstacle). I am just fed up with their behavior & statements like "but now we are really doing X or Y" just to disappoint people with not delivering anything. Happy you still have hopes left there :D

@Sven J Also having lately issues with my profiles which were created some month ago - for me all the controls are still visible in the configuration of the profile, but as soon as I start the profile, non are shown... I haven't tried any further but I guess it could be a try worth to completely delete the app data+cache from the android app center and then retry with reimporting / recreating them fresh. I would also recommend to write them an email with an complaint, otherwise they may still think they should focus on advertising their faulty software stack on exhibitions..

From my experiences with locktights their dryed-out remainings may be carved out when the screw is being loosened and tightened again..

Thanks, added to the main post.

@vergogneless There are tutorials for how to apply locktight correctly..

Oh, nice find @Ryokeen - I think I may want to add those information to the entry post.. is it anything else out of stainless steel besides the 8T?

haha, n1 - enjoy

I wouldn't rely on them anyhow anymore after their vows they broke severely... This company and their products can not be recommended to anybody frommy experiences.. The hardware product itself is a nice thing, but their software stack, support and also their public relations is just one of the worst I have seen.. esp. if its a niche market, like they are in... normally companies are performing very well in those early stages - but I have the strong feeling they were more interested in high life than further working on their product, if one takes a look at their YT profile for the last two years.. Just nobody wants to see their CEO throwing a Set with buwizz down 2 floors to see "if it can fly" - which obvious answer is no... Sorry but for me they lost their sanity since long already, I can just be angry at them (or myself) for buying their lies (and product in consequence)!

you could also use the PartsPack from Philo as he had designed the Buwizz 3 receivers - possibly then its a nobrainer to create them as regular 3d models.

it is basically the position where it rests on one of the sides (took the picture the other day, forget if it really hit left or on the right side... but basically this is the max angle already..

here you go

Do those views help better? @gyenesvi

@vergogneless I am happy your order exceeded mine in price, that helps me for still considering my addiction as mild... 😂👌

Meh, seems the MTP Wheelhubs won't have the u-joint positioned exactly in line with the pinholes, as suspected before.. Picture is with one of their shorter u-joints which is sitting on the inner metal part, but still too high.. :(

All welcome, we are helping out each other where we all can :)

It may be because of your links are just offering plain unencrypted HTTP:// - modern browsers are cautios about such uncreypted sources to be loaded. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-origin_resource_sharing) I tested your links with HTTPS:// but sems you picture hoster doesn't support encrypted connections - so I would also recommend to just create yourself a 100% free account on www.bricksafe.com - as you get 10 GB of free space + they offer https:// links to be used. So using bricksafe will lead to your pictures getting visible in the postings. Here is the exact warning in my browsers DeveloperConsole for the test picture not shown by @Jims test: Mixed Content: The page at 'https://www.eurobricks.com/forum/index.php?/forums/topic/149997-help/&page=55&tab=comments#comment-3734681' was loaded over HTTPS, but requested an insecure element 'http://www.mgtx.fr/LEGO/Divers/69762_45deg.jpg'. This request was automatically upgraded to HTTPS, For more information see https://blog.chromium.org/2019/10/no-more-mixed-messages-about-https.html As the hoster doesn't allow https to be used, the picture cant be loaded. From the page of chromium (source of all modern browsers nowadays):

If you want to have them in the correct place and stay there, I would recommend another position to solder the cables.. otherwise it may really get nasty with the pins.. Also in a simple PCB design I think the thickness of routings in the pcb could be done narrow enough for limiting the connection point of the pins with the plugs.. Couldn't we ask @NoEXIST if he has a MK Box or so to open and design us a very simple pcb? 😅

hehe enjoy, MTP and ZENE parts I bought so far all very nice :D

Oh boy, may you want to send this to MTP for them doing this in metal?! 🔥 (just went with the first sentence and no pics for better readability)

I would think of a simple PCB holding the pins for the PF ports, a usb port and then just route it to some soldering holes for cables?! But I am not into PCB design.. so the PCB could replace the original and the cables could be soldered from the bottom to go into the free space of where the batt was / leave the housing.

Ahhhh nice, I was too lazy to search them for myself! Edit: Added the hint, thanks mate!

My two units are still in their boxes unfortunately @FriedlS - job and other topics are kind of overwhelming, I hope I will get more active soon again as I really miss the joy it brings.. so got a jumborc transmitter here already, just a thing of ordering a charger and some batts..

I need to force myself into video creating, I reckon - but yes I will consider doing testing well and clarifying. I may get back for asking for thoughts about what / how to test as I am not so deep in the 4-wheel vehicle category, besides obvious thoughts like "aligned to the holes would possibly be best" :D And yes, salty prices - for me personally it is currently ok to pay that price. If I think of the costs of R&D of creating a well thought product, I am happy I can support them to at least have a direct small compensation, but more in ways of seeing a 0-Day order.. (btw shipped already). But from my previous experiences with their other products, the wheelhubs will be worth the money is my expectation & I am sure they will deliver a high quality product. We will see in the near future! Another thing, just to mention: I am not affiliated with MTP or ZENEBricks, so I am paying my private orders as everybody else is doing. The only thing I asked for with my current order: If I may get a single ballbearing fitting to one of the 5Ls as one broke as I tried to push one of their early series axles through (they need veeery hard press to get through the bearings, newer axles have a better fitting tolerance) for free as replacement, as it would allow to revive one of my previously bought products. I was told "no issue" -> so their service is also nice and open to help!