Jim

I'm sure they won't have a problem with that On a different (trivial matter); In The Netherlands we are currently experiencing a heat wave. My LEGO room is under the roof and I am afraid my LEGO is melting. Unfortunately I can't check, because it's just too hot to enter (hopefully temperature will go down a bit this weekend, so I can continue working on my reviews)

Recently we posted the Spectre MkII by Migalart. Guess what?! There's also a Spectre MkI (Spectre 501). Posted a while ago, but it's still worthy of some extra exposure.

This is some seriously impressive work!! So many great details, it's unbelievable.

That's why I was driving in a confined space

There might be direct RC support, which is even better. So let's hope that will become a reality.

Nice work on the standalone mode! That's really useful for demonstration purposes etc. You are getting closer and closer and I am convinced you will reach your goal. Gamepad support (for Android) is great! Hopefully you will be able to implement direct control too. That would really be awesome.

This comment is very important. Preferably store the boxes inside another box or (non sticking) bag or wrapping. Plastic bags might stick to the box when it gets hot (not sure, maybe).

Respect brother!

Recently I posted about a new third party Power Functions Controller and Battery, the BuWizz. I have had the chance the test a prototype unit. You can find my review in the Technic Forum. Only a couple of days left to back this project, so hurry up.

REVIEW - BUWIZZ - HIGH PERFORMANCE LEGO POWER FUNCTIONS CONTROLLER INTRODUCTION Recently I stumbled upon a new way to control your LEGO Power Functions models. It's called BuWizz and it's currently being funded using Kickstarter. I was lucky to receive a copy for testing purposes. This small review will reflect my findings. BUWIZZ UNIT The BuWizz unit isn't just a controller, it's a battery as well. It's conveniently sized like the Power Functions Rechargeable Battery Box and the less expensive Power Functions AAA Battery Box. Check out this interesting article on Philos website for more information about battery boxes. As you can see I received a 3D printed prototype. The white button turns the unit on (and off). There's a green light indicating the unit's on/off state. When I received the unit, I immediately charged it to make sure the battery would be fully charged when testing it. The pin holes in each side of the unit makes for easy mounting. The boxes designed by TLG don't have these holes, which makes them harder to attach to your model. Pinholes on the short sides would be great, but I understood there's already little room for the circuit board etc. MOTORIZED 42039 For this demo I will be using a Motorized 42039 Chassis, which is shown below. It's been sitting on the shelves for a while, so there's some dust here and there. Sorry about that Here's a detailed picture of the motor configuration. I like this setup, because it's lean and powerful. Only downside is that you need to remove the fake engine. But it leaves ample space for additional motorizations. I attached both PF L motors to port #3 on the BuWizz and I connected the PF Servo to port #1. Since it's just a single unit, it can be easily mounted somewhere on the model. A single unit can be an advantage or a disadvantage, depending on your model and your goal. If you like to replace the PF setup for some of the official models, you will need more modifications, since the form factor is different. On the other hand (the advantage), the total space you need for connecting 4 motors is less then when you are using two PF IR receivers and a PF battery box. So all in all it's a compact solution, especially when you need to hookup more than two motors. BUWIZZ APP Now that I have prepared the hardware and the model, I need to fire up the app. I am using an iPhone 6 for this test by the way. I don't have an Android phone, so I can't compare the two interfaces. From what I understood the iOS interface is still pretty basic and will be improved for the final product. First step is connecting to a unit. It's possible to connect to multiple BuWizz units with a single app. It's even possible to control your TV with the BuWizz, looking at the image below There are four positions available in the screen, each corresponding to an output/port on the brick. For each control/port you can select the type of control you'd like to use. You can choose between: Horizontal or vertical slider Horizontal or vertical accelerometer (tilt controller) Horizontal or vertical mixer (tracked vehicle steering) SLIDERS Slider are the basic controls for operating a motor. Sliding vertically or horizontally sends power to the motors, resulting in steering or driving. ACCELEROMETER Unlike the sliders, the model is controlled by tilting your phone. MIXERS Mixers are used for tracked vehicles. I think this name needs a little work. Here you can see I selected the horizontal and vertical slider, for both steering and accelerating. Next to the Start button you can see the CPU Temperature and Battery Voltage. TESTING I started the test in my photo studio, with very limited space. The BuWizz immediately responded to my commands, so the setup is very straightforward. Installing and configuring only took a couple of minutes. Ease of use if always a big plus when you try a new product. The video below demonstrates driving the model in the garden. Around 30 seconds I switched to ludicrous speed, which actually caused wheel spin. I am very pleased with the performance of the unit. I noticed some of you having problems with the lack of physical feedback when controlling the unit using a smart phone. I do concur that it can be tricky using the sliders. The final version of the phone will have bigger controls, which will improve the experience. Furthermore, you can use the accelerometer controls and tilt the controls to steer your model. That actually works quite well and is a lot of fun. You can configure the "zero-position" by pressing start in the neutral position. I have spoken to Roni and there will probably be RC support for the BuWizz. If this becomes a reality, and that's still an if (no guarantees), it means that you can control your model with RC "gamepads". This would obviously be a big plus for BuWizz. I did run into some connectivity issues where the BuWizz unit would lose connection at the end of the garden. This is because I used the prototype and a different BT solution is chosen for the final product. I quote: The final product will use BT solution from Slovenian company Chipolo, they do BLE for a living for 3 years now (proximity tags) and they got up to 120m range. This means we will probably get 60m or so since we need reliable communication, not just detection. VALUE FOR MONEY How much bang do you get for your buck? The price of a single unit is around $100 (that is 100 USD) excluding S&H. This boils down to $125 for a single unit and $230 for two units, if you choose the recently introduced Double Special. When you compare the price to the PF rechargeable battery box ($40 plus a $30 transformer makes $70) combined with two PF IR receivers ($15 each) it results in more or less the same price. I know most of us will have plenty IR Receivers, but it's only fair to compare the complete package. So the price seems fair, but worldwide shipping does add a significant percentage of the original price (around 25%). You do get the BuWizz unit for less money than the final version will be, although I highly doubt people will be inclined to pay more than $100 for a single unit. I personally think $100 will be the psychological ceiling price, but the potential RC support might negate that ceiling. SUMMARY So, what do I think of this product? I think it's already a great product. Some improvements can (and will be) made to the final product. Potential addition of RC would definitely add value to the product. PROS Easy to configure Easy to use Lots of power Ludicrous speed Battery and controller in one (can be Con as well) Form factor Control multiple BuWizz bricks Price is lower then the final version CONS Form factor is different than original PF setup (can be Pro as well) Lost connection (supposedly solved in final product) Only controllable via an app (would be solved with RC support) Shipping adds a significant percentage to the price TO BE CONTINUED... Actual range of the final BT receiver Possible RC support CONCLUSION I have confidence in this project so I backed it with $199 for two units ($230 including S&H), the Double Special. There are improvements possible, but the easy of use already makes this a great addition to the PF product range for AFOLs and Kids alike. So don't waste your time and back this project, before it's too late! CLOSING WORDS Here's a video (by Zblj) demonstrating the BuWizz unit with 2 RC buggy motors. As you can see the performance is incredible. He used the Android app.

And we will be back at square one But with a 2016 lineup to raise the bar (again) for years to come!

To be honest; I have no idea. I think we need to wait for TLG to announce them, but I'm not sure.

It's 1964. Vietnam is starting. Martin Luther King receives the Nobel Peace Prize the year Nelson Mandela is jailed. Sony introduces the Video Cassette Recorder, and the computer mouse is invented. Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor marry for the first time. The Beatles are riding high in international charts, but I want you to put I Get Around by the Beach Boys on your internal gramophone, grab your shorts and the keys to your Bug, and head on over to Californ-eye-ay coz' we are going surfin'! Before you do that, head on over to the Special LEGO Themes forum to check out this this great review brought to you by our very own Special Themes Moderator Rufus!

Are we known for our poor vehicle color preference?! Wasn't aware of that :P

Spot on!!

Thanks The wheels look big and cool, but the red and green combo doesn't look nearly as good as I'd hoped. I think green and white with red rims will work better. To the moderator: Sorry for this off topic side step

Recently, I have seen the light....or the lime.... I think the combination with medium blue ruined it for me. The Claas has a way better combination. How about this model with red rims and red instead of medium blue, using the Claas tires

Let me check that for you. If I remember correctly it isn't much better than the older versions.

I don't think we have comparison data yet. By strong you mean "less prone to breaking"?

They aren't exactly soft. They are softer than I expected, but still hard enough for the 42030. I don't have the 42030 built anymore, so I can't show it to you guys. That's good to know. I will take my time then See my comment about the 42030. Unfortunately I disassemble most of the sets, due to lack of space.

Yup, they are great. I was hoping TLG would include something like them with the EV3, but unfortunately they included the metal ball. Check out the instructions for this model: http://www.hitechnic.com/models

You are talking about different parts Red discs vs the black "hubs" used in the Porsche. Both are in the picture.

Yup! I think we definitely have a winner. These tires seem to fulfill a lot of wishes.

I think you will need quite some force. Maybe better to use 45mm Rotacasters: http://www.rotacaster.com.au/shop/robotic-wheels/index