Jump to content

BrickbyBrickTechnic

Eurobricks Counts
  • Posts

    1,641
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BrickbyBrickTechnic

  1. Finally, someone did it! This is the first c-model I could think of coming from this set, and you executed it very nicely. Great job!
  2. Now that is the greatest alternate model I have ever seen! Amazing use of parts and beautiful result. I want to get my hands on a 42083 now, just to build this!
  3. Both look really good IMO. But if I had to pick, v1.
  4. Awesome! I assume you used some sort of programmed cycle to control the movement?
  5. Ohhhhhhh. I thought you meant to increase the downward range. That would have required extra cylinders. Yes I can, though I would need an extra t-piece. Sorry about that
  6. Plus one as well. It's so beautifully done.
  7. Darn, you have "taken" my idea! (haha, not really- I was planning the same thing and started to lay some stuff out, but whatever, it's for fun.) Yours already looks better than anything I could build with my pieces, so I think I will reconsider what my idea will be. I am intrigued as to how you will do the pendular motion motorized. Following with interest
  8. Thanks! 1. No, there is not. I tried the 42043's wheel but it was too big and I forgot to look for an alternative 2. I think it would take some extra cylinders that aren't in 42043, but it should be. Thanks. I agree, the forks' range is probably the worst part of this MOC (IMO).
  9. Sure looks deadly, but really cool project. I wonder how you will control the actuator going up & down (regular IR vs. some sort of cycle where it reaches max height then goes down automatically).
  10. Thank you! I had never heard of them until 2 weeks ago. Thanks very much Thanks a lot! Thanks! They are quite interesting.
  11. Interesting concept, but why is such a small weight difference so important? If you want to save 0.3oz, just remove 5 parts, instead of building your entire MOC black?
  12. Not bad. I find the idea of mounting the crane on turntables interesting.
  13. Hey everyone, Presenting my latest MOC, the side-loading forklift. It is a C model of 42043 with 3 manual functions and 3 pneumatic functions. HoG steering Live-axle suspension Outriggers Opening doors + bonnet Sliding forklift Raising lift Spreading pallets This one was quite a challenge to build, mainly because there was no space for real mechanism due to the fact that I had to put a U-shaped hole in the chassis for the authenticity (Here's an image for those who don't know what a side-loading forklift is). That also meant I had to make a really strong, 2-stud wide connection between the rear and front of the chassis, which was a pain given that an axle for outriggers had to run through that joint. Here are some pictures: Thanks for reading! All comments are much appreciated. BbBT
  14. Are 9l links possible? If so, there should be enough room to stick in the shifter. EDIT: I checked the renders again and using 9l links means ample space for the shifter. If that fails, I have 1 more idea.
  15. This is a pretty simple, ingenious mechanism! I wasn't sure where this was going at first, but now I think this is really nice! Do you plan on coupling the ratchets?
  16. Shifter time! After tampering with several designs, I settled on one of @Didumos69's designs. I took the essential concept and built a compact housing for it which fits the renders of the chassis. The 9l and 13l beams represent those of the chassis as it is now. Hope this works.
  17. Awesome (and somewhat similar to my idea)! Looks like a really fun ride and a great concept to build!
  18. Ok, I won't. I was just throwing around a suggestion
  19. Hey everyone, just a question: I managed to order some of the new 20z cutch gears and wave selector. Does anyone want a redesign of the gearbox which contains both parts? Also, shifter redesign will come in a few days.
  20. Well in that case 42082 only has one function, move the crane, doesn't it? Why do we need 4000 pieces to move a crane? It's clear the thing is bigger than it needs to be (76cm long in closed configuration); it could have been done in 2000 pieces, even with @Jim's wheel covers.
  21. That sounds like quite an amazing contest! Maybe looks should be factored in as well... Sorry for contributing to offtopic
  22. And why exactly would they be needed? Hasn't the video already established the placement of all the switches on the thing?
  23. Awesome! This certainly seems like a scary ride
×
×
  • Create New...