Jump to content

schraubedrin

Eurobricks Citizen
  • Posts

    379
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by schraubedrin

  1. @Jim, @Sariel, have you arranged it so sariel starts with 42070 and Jim with 42069?
  2. Which seems to be the standard practice of governments these days (Sorry for OT but i couldn't resist)
  3. The recently leaked Star Wars buildable Figure 75529 seems to be another source for red #3 connectors. If i remember correctly there is quite a high demand for this part, right?
  4. exactly. Sorry i didn't point that out in my post. For me personally, 42069 is the next in line of 8466, 8297, and 9398 (i'm still bummed out that i didn't get the last two)
  5. Good find! But here's the confirmation that 42069 has no middle differential Well, i guess there's some modding to be done
  6. "Thank you for your vote" message and the poll disappears
  7. "Show Results" only works when i open it in a new tab [EDIT:] Maybe it's a browser related issue? I'm using Firefox...
  8. Yes sir! That's nice to hear, your reviews are really high quality. Speaking of high quality reviews: Is there any word whether sariel will get them too?
  9. So, according to the catalogue the models will come out in August. Do we have any information whether reviewers will get them earlier?
  10. I'm not convinced of this after i heard how much money some parrents spend on the Christmas/birthday gifts for their kids. The parents buy it because their kids want it and the kids want it because it's cool to build big sets with older recommended age than theirs. And i guess LEGO has similar thoughts when i look at the instructions of the 42056 Porsche I haven't looked at the pictures that closely. Is the drivetrain visible enough that we can say this for sure? All 4WD Vehicles i can remember either had a centre differential (8466), separated-axle propulsion (9398) or articulated steering in the middle between both axles (42030). I'd be slightly disappointed if they'd designed such a "faulty" drivetrain.
  11. Indeed, you've noticed it at the time. Sorry i restarted the discussion
  12. I don't remember the exact steps any more, but here's an example i just found in Step 34: I guess calling it "bending" is exaggerated in this case, but it wouldn't be possible without the flexibility of the pieces. This isn't a problem, just something i'm not used to from official instructions, as there would have been a way without "bending" necessary. (English isn't my first language, is there a better word instead of "bending" for this kind of thing?)
  13. On a related note: Is it just me or are the instructions for 42039 bad quality? I remember building it and having to bend the parts in some steps. Having disassembled the model last week i realize that there are some stages of the build where there's only one or two correct next steps. But still, i was taken aback at some steps suggested in the instructions.
  14. I might be wrong here, but haven't nearly all Trucks centre diffs for lower wear of the tires and narrower turning radius; and they get locked only in harsh offroad conditions? I'd say authenticity would be lost without a centre diff, but gained with a diff locking mechanism. Unfortunately i don't think LEGO will ever implement a lockable diff because of customers complaining of a big turning radius, not realising they've locked the diff
  15. Thanks, that's very interesting information! Where did you get that from?
  16. An educational MOC with realistic car details would actually be a great idea. But for now, it's getting disassembled, i need the room
  17. I don't quite see how, as the central beam doesn't gain stiffness from it's holes being filled with elastic pins and the side walls would have the same amount of holes filled with blue pins. This lot of Pins only seems to add weight.
  18. I thought about this too, but according to blakbird's review, there are several 2L pins unused:
  19. I remember building 42009 and being surprised at the huge number of black 2L pins where blue 3L pins would suffice: Has there been any explanation of this at the time of the model?
  20. I wanted to build a gearbox that wasn't efficient, small or reliable, but based on gearboxes used in real cars. The always present problem is the lack of different sized clutch-gears in LEGO Technic. So the main difference is an idler gear-stage needed to generate the different ratios. The build is quite messy and unstable and it lacks any kinematics for a gear knob. As this was only planned as a proof of concept it's enough for me : The gear ratios are: 1st: 1:3 (0,33) 2nd: 3:5 (0,6) 3rd: 1:1 (1,0) 4th: 5:3 (1,67) 5th: 3:1 (3,0) Rev: 8:15 (0,53) The ratio of reverse is between 1st and 2nd gear, just like in real life. The absolute values are not. Here's a picture of only the gears with each gear ratio colored (Input on the left): I enjoy those small builds without care for good design, only to represent mechanical concepts. This way i have the joy of technic, without the hassle of a huge build that usually accompanies mechanical complexity
  21. While building mine i actually thought about your model and couldn't fathom how you managed to create the necessary joints for such a small scale. Then i realized that a universal joint wasn't necessary and any joint leaving 2 degrees freedom in rotation was good enough. Thanks a lot for the pictures, it's great to see your compact solution!
  22. How on earth do you find such a great deal ? I once paid 150€ for a used 42043 and thought it was a good deal
  23. Here's the final Version for now: After i realized how strong the pneumatics are, i made some rudimentary reinforcements. And now i have a new stand for my unfinished 42056: I really wish i had the necessary filming equipment to give you a sense of scale. It's whicked to see such a big model move with such ease: @mocbuild101 thanks for your encouraging words. The building process was fun throughout and seeing the finished model really gives me a sense of accomplishment
  24. This looks awesome. I'm excited to see the finished model. Do you think the thin pneumatic cylinder will have enough power at this position? The Lever seems to be quite small.
×
×
  • Create New...