Jump to content

PROlego

Eurobricks Citizen
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    195

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by PROlego

  1. PROlego
    :sceptic: If more people give you usefull advice and this is going to be your final entry I'd definitely change it, but probably only for this it isn't worth it.
  2. PROlego
    I agree, it will be much better with bigger wings. Only making the doors a bit taller, which won't look bad IMO will make them a bit bigger.
  3. PROlego
    Is it possible to put a Mini LA to adjust the cab tilt? Maybe with a knob on the side or below you can retract it to make the cab look more "normal" and extend it before transformating to the jeep.
  4. PROlego
    Very good idea, it's nice to see a MOC dedicated to your space efforts instead of NASA's (not critising anyone, in fact the more you can do the better ).
  5. PROlego
    Another fan of space here and although I've stated previosly that this is not my favourite vehicle and I'd prefer to have a model of the venerable Soyuz I'd like to build this (probably a Buran version which won't need the parts for the SSMEs but should have a second robotic arm) if I get enough parts soon. I don't like the nose, though. I know it is pretty hard to change it but now it reminds me of the nose of Sierra Nevada's Dream Chaser or ESA's Hermes because it's "roundy" instead of "pointy" (very scientific description here hehehe). The rest is great IMHO.
  6. PROlego
    I think that that every motor, including the E-motor (but not the servo), has a similar internal design, the only difference is size of the motor and the gearing. Probably the E-motor is like a M-motor with no/less gearing and a different case. If that's true then I guess no motor should ever be damaged for being used as a generator.
  7. PROlego
    I did a small and reeeeally simple car with only drive and steering using XL motor as generators and M motor as actuators, there are no pics, it was built in five minutes. I played with it tested it for 15 mins and the motors are still working well.
  8. PROlego
    Nice moc, nothing that others haven't said to say. I don't miss any function here, but I love the complex gearboxes in the bigger models, I also like the brakes, but I don't think they are the most important thing and can be omitted if you prefer or there is no place for them.
  9. PROlego
    Gran Turismo 4 (PS2), been playing in for one third of my life and finished it twice (all three 24 hour races included).
  10. PROlego
    Here you've got a link to all the people who has set their location as "South Africa". Just click "more search options" and write "South Africa" in "location" or "country" (country shows more results). Then click "apply filters. Sorry for my poor English I hope you understand this fine. http://www.eurobrick...ers&module=list Note that some members may not be Technic fans.
  11. PROlego
    I like some of your ideas more than Nathanael's, and I kinda like connectors more than flex axles in the front. Good job!
  12. PROlego
    1. 2 points. 31. 1 point.
  13. PROlego
    Have you tried with a permanent marker instead of paint?
  14. PROlego
    Hello. I haven't got any driving rings so I wonder if you could fit the new version of the driving rings only removing the extender and moving the changeover catch half a stud to the side?
  15. PROlego
    Nice car! Good luck with it. PS: VTEC just kicked in, yo!
  16. PROlego
    Nice model, but I think you can improve the rear air intake (I guess that is what the black panel is). It looks much more complicated to do than the Audi Quattro, but it turned out nicely.
  17. PROlego
    They're real! How are they going to compete at night without real headlamps?
  18. PROlego
    Nice video.It is so fast it even has three "g" instead of two! :P
  19. PROlego
    If this set was a expensive LEGO system set I think they will use the 1x5 tile to make more people buy the set for new parts.
  20. PROlego
    Featured in WTF1.com http://wtf1.co.uk/lego-technic-lmp1-stop-motion/
  21. PROlego
    You're right, there was a lack of flights that made it more expensive but the manteinance itself was very costly, I think more expensive than a full Soyuz or Proton. Using upgraded versions of R-7 is not a bad idea. That makes it cheaper. According to Spanish astronaut Pedro Duque Soyuz is also safer than the Shuttle. Using the STS to send satellites to low earth orbit with crew is obvisly a worst idea than sending them in a unmanned russian or european ship.
  22. PROlego
    I know the shuttle is agreat technological achievement but it was much more expensive to reuse than a expendable rocket to build and launch. Roscosmos' 60 year old technology does the same things for a cheaper price.
  23. PROlego
    Very nice C-model of one of the worst ideas NASA has ever had (check http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Space_Shuttle_program ) Back on topic: it will look much better with white pins and axles but I am afraid they either don't exist or they are two rare. Now make the SRBs and the external tank!
  24. PROlego
    It was obviusly a joke, two of them will cost you as much as a new set.
  25. PROlego
    I will sell them to you for 130 Euros each or change both of them for a new set.
×
×
  • Create New...