nerdsforprez

I queried about this in the past. Perhaps it needs its own thread. I certainly should test my own theory. But in really complex gear boxes, I wonder if we should start seriously considering using lubrication to reduce friction. I know folks use like a silicone spray when using applications where there is a high RPM, but perhaps we should consider using it also in low RPM functions but with high friction. Real machines do. Cats, cranes, dozers, any heavy machinery of low RPM/high friction application uses some form of lubrication. It would be tedious to lubricate each part, but really you would only have to lub functional items (axles, gears, etc.). Interesting to give it a test....

I agree here. @Lego Tom I believe you are confusing preference with reality. That is great to state your preference, but the reality is your preference is not one that all folks share. I, along with @TeamThrifty, would prefer a non-color vomited set and more difficult instructions even if that means it is more difficult to assemble. Perhaps where some of the confusion lies is between folks differing ideas of how they enjoy the hobby. We use the terms "assemble" and "build" synonymously, when in reality they are not. One really implies just following instructions, paint-by-numbers type of thing. Deductive logic may be used on occasion, but no real inductive logic. Building is quite different. If there is any paint-by-numbers going on, those numbers might mismatch or be a digit off here and there at times. There is some mystery and mistic about how one arrives at the final product. Not only is deductive logic used, but inductive logic at times as well. THere may be a few swear words, perhaps even tears, but if the final destination is arrived at the joy is typically more delectable, because of work and toil was so much greater to get there. Folks hobby different. There is no right or wrong way. Although it is tempting to think of "the former is for average people and the latter is for smart people" that is not necessarily the case. Perhaps one's job is full of "building", inductive logic, etc. and "hobbying" simply means a beer, good music, and a simple assembly job to relax. I feel that is what Lego is for. Nothing is wrong with that. But RELAXing is the operative phrase here. All your doing is assembling. Kinda like Ikea Furniture. As a company, their job is to make the instructions as easy as possible. Take all the guess work out of the equation. True building on the other hand, while enjoyable, many times is NOT RELAXing at all. There is lots of guess work. Almost like you are solving a mystery. And there is a place in "hobbying" for that as well. In the US in the last couple of years we are seeing a burgeoning of what are called "escape rooms" where one is to solve a bunch of riddles to escape a physical space they are locked into. The process is supposed to be hard. Its supposed to stump you a bit. But that is the fun. Don't go on a Friday night after a 60 hour work week and your fried - you'll hate it. But when you are well-rested, and ready for a challenge - they are great.

What happened to the Chinook??

Great Build! Wonderful choice at this scale and executed great. I love that front end, looks so beefy and rugged.

A manual model selected to represent a vehicle known for its off-road capabilities is an interesting choice. Surely a first modification will be to motorize it. I don't mind that it is a manual set, but I hope there are some interesting functions so it pays some homage to the actual thing. Will be paying close attention to this thread as well. I also share others concerns about the neon yellow color. I hope that is not selected. Not only do I think it looks bad, it will limit what the pieces can be used for in the future...

Pure, silly fun. Thxs for the post. Enjoyed hearing grown men laugh in the background and enjoying themselves...

Nope. Well-played... as in expertly executed. But well-paid is a whole new application!

Well-played

Brilliant. Looks are spot on. Great job.

Saw it too. My goodness. Great news. I have been wanting new engine elements for a while. All the sudden, I might be purchasing this set... or at least buying many of these new elements once they become available on B&P....

This is my concern as well. I think one would be evaluating a demographic rather than actual building ability.....

Oh yea. Not correct. There truly is "American" speak (said in negative undertones)

Fun to participate in the voting. Great submissions. As always, Thxs @Jim and @Milan for hosting.

TY @Toastie and others for the responses. The build is near an outlet, but I will have to do some finagling if I wanted to use it. Which I may. I can also add a new part to the build that would be outside of the rest of the build, to cover up a power bank and also make it easily accessible. I have some options. I was also thinking about something like these little light bricks, or something similar. They are popping up everywhere on Temu and Aliexpress. I guess, after reading, you place an axle inside, twist, and it turns on. Anyone have experience with these? Really, I would only need the lights on for display, and not a lot of light, nor would it have to be focused, so this would be an acceptable option.

Anyone have any good recommendations for light systems for your Legos? I know there are many options to choose from, and yes I have done my homework, but what I am looking for is something with a very long battery life, or something with near-infinite power source. I have a long hx of working with different systems, but the problem is that usually my lights are embedded deep into a build. When the battery source wears out I have to disassemble too much to make it worth my while of exchanging the batteries. Something with an alternative PS, or perhaps even external PS would be great. Or the use of watch batteries or something that doesn't really ever need charging....