LEGO Star Wars 2025 Set Discussion - READ FIRST POST!!!

[Llewop]

I wonder if Lego is on a leaker hunt. people see different images, they leak it, either that or it’s something lost in translation maybe or people presuming. I swear we’ve never had a rumour where the figs are consistent but the actual build is so uncertain 

[BrickBob Studpants]

My guess would be the CTT, mostly because A) that would (partially) explain the low PPR with the large wheels and panel pieces, and B) the fact the RTG set was first rumoured to be a CTT. It'd be kinda hilarious if a CTT was rumoured to be one of two sets, only to then end up being neither of them

[Darth_Bane13]

I hope it's not a turbo tank because at that piece count it'll probably be even smaller than the 2016 one. I think the turbo tank should be big like the 2005 and 2010 sets.

[BrickPrick]

Hello there. 

After spending what felt like half an eternity as a silent Kallidahin (totally did not search for quiet Star Wars species) a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, i finally decided the timing was just right to say a thing or two as well. 

I just wanna be extra clear on this... You are allowed to talk about all those juicy leaks, just not share any visuals about them in here. Have i got this right? 

 

Best regards, BrickPrick

 

Edited April 18 by BrickPrick

[ArrowBricks]

1 hour ago, JohnTPT17 said:

Let's just call 75413 "Schrödinger's Battle Tank" for now, apparently.

Either the photos the leakers are looking at are super blurry and they are just guessing, or (and this is a long shot) it's a Creator-style set that allows you to build one of multiple different tanks. 

I would suspect most haven’t yet seen the photos, and are going off of the figures. 

1 hour ago, BrickBob Studpants said:

My guess would be the CTT, mostly because A) that would (partially) explain the low PPR with the large wheels and panel pieces, and B) the fact the RTG set was first rumoured to be a CTT. It'd be kinda hilarious if a CTT was rumoured to be one of two sets, only to then end up being neither of them

This - would be odd that a Turbo Tank was rumoured for two different sets. My guess is the turbo tank wheels have been seen by those in the know. 

[JohnTPT17]

1 hour ago, BrickPrick said:

I just wanna be extra clear on this... You are allowed to talk about all those juicy leaks, just not share any visuals about them in here. Have i got this right? 

 

Best regards, BrickPrick

Welcome to Eurobricks! Yes, discussions of any leaks are allowed, but no reposting of images or directly linking to them.

[BrickPrick]

1 minute ago, JohnTPT17 said:

Welcome to Eurobricks! Yes, discussions of any leaks are allowed, but no reposting of images or directly linking to them.

Well, thank you. And alright... good to know. Easy enough to follow. 

Still got some catching up to do with this thread. Can not wait to get properly started. 

[Matichado]

Im expecting at the VERY LEAST pauldrons on the 327th battlepack, if they don’t all have them, I won’t buy a single one and will just buy the GCC version

[Duke27]

3 hours ago, Agent Kallus said:

she's pink not red but I suppose she could get tattooed)

I have watch the trailer and for me she looks pretty red

[Mandalorianknight]

3 hours ago, Llewop said:

Maybe I just don’t get the hype around the character like he got cut in half and killed somehow survived did some stuff got beat by a teenager did some more stuff then dies again.

I mean you can boil any character down to "did some stuff and died", so even in your version of events he's more interesting than the standard SW character given he dies multiple times. And I'd hardly call Ahsoka a standard teenager, nor would I say Maul was singularly focused on stopping her given he was ranting about Palpatine's plan and overall kind of scattered by that point in the fight.

3 hours ago, BrickBob Studpants said:

A show focusing on a bad guy has never been done before in SW

This is very interesting to me. Not only is it a first there, and unlike Ventress/Boba I doubt they'll try and make Maul a good guy, it feels like it'll be more mature than the animation typically is for SW. Obviously TCW and even rebels/bad batch had their darker moments (ironically many of those in the first two coming directly from maul), but a maul show feels like it'll have that as a baseline, not as just a few moments.

2 hours ago, BrickBob Studpants said:

So we now have yet another new rumour about 75413, with the source claiming it's the Stun Tank from the Zillo Beast arc of TCW  Did we ever have a set before that was rumoured to be one of three things?!  Not sure how I'd feel about the Stun Tank since it'd be a new vehicle, but one that has even less to do with Galactic Marines than the CTT.

Not to mention it's just as if not more obscure than the UT-AT, so at that point why isn't it the UT-AT, AND IIRC it's supposed to be a good deal smaller than an 830 piece, $150-160 set should be.

1 hour ago, BrickBob Studpants said:

My guess would be the CTT, mostly because A) that would (partially) explain the low PPR with the large wheels and panel pieces, and B) the fact the RTG set was first rumoured to be a CTT. It'd be kinda hilarious if a CTT was rumoured to be one of two sets, only to then end up being neither of them

I hope it's the CTT, just because anything else makes that PPP X-jet levels, just without the "X-men returning" "justification" (from lego's end, not an actual value end). 

1 hour ago, Darth_Bane13 said:

I hope it's not a turbo tank because at that piece count it'll probably be even smaller than the 2016 one. I think the turbo tank should be big like the 2005 and 2010 sets.

The 2005 five tank, if the exact same thing was released today, would be that $150 price the 2025 one was, at 29 fewer pieces. We may trade some larger piece sizes for detail but they overall seem pretty consistent, and would you really want a 2025 set to have the detail of that 2005 one?

The 2010 one is more detailed but would be $180 today off inflation alone. If we wanted to get it up to the 2025 standard for detail we'd be looking at a $200 set.

1 hour ago, BrickPrick said:

I just wanna be extra clear on this... You are allowed to talk about all those juicy leaks, just not share any visuals about them in here. Have i got this right? 

Welcome! Yup, so long as you aren't sharing any leaked images or links to them, you're perfectly fine to discuss them in as much detail as you want.

[Agent Kallus]

2 minutes ago, Duke27 said:

I have watch the trailer and for me she looks pretty red

Okay? Well regardless of what you say she remains pink. Maybe the lighting made her look red? I mean pink is really just a pale red. Red lightsaber though.

[Meaf]

19 hours ago, Mandalorianknight said:

The only thing is, they didn't increase them to the upper end of what the tariffs are expected to be- in fact, they're significantly below the current tariff on mexico, which I believe is where most sets are coming from. It's possible they've just worked out a way to switch it up so all the sets coming to NA are the ones from Vietnam, but some of the price increases are below the Vietnam tariffs too, the transport cost would assumably be spiking if they're shipping stuff farther geographically, etc. 

They didn't increase them to what we've been expecting recently, but it's entirely possible (I'd say probable, even) that these decisions on prices were made a while ago, when the expectations around what was the potential limit on tariffs were radically different. Anyway though my main point here is more so just that it's an unpredictable situation. Given how rapidly things have been changing and the current 90 day waiting period, I think Lego is just playing it safe here by increasing prices a bit so that their financials look fine regardless of how things end up playing out. It sucks that they're increasing prices, obviously, but it's just safer for the business and has better optics too since the vast majority of people will never know the prices were going to be lowe to begin with. 

As far as potential Legos go, I would be interested in seeing what they do for the Maul show. Don't really feel like I need a show about him but the little I've heard is interesting enough where I'm sure they could do a cool set or two, and I feel like it's pretty much inevitable since Lego seems to love the guy.

[BrickPrick]

5 minutes ago, Mandalorianknight said:

Welcome! Yup, so long as you aren't sharing any leaked images or links to them, you're perfectly fine to discuss them in as much detail as you want.

My thanks. As long as i get paid, it makes no difference to me.  

By the way, i have been following your career with great interest. I honestly feel honoured to finally be able to join the conversation about them precious pieces of plastic. 

[Agent Kallus]

12 minutes ago, BrickPrick said:

My thanks. As long as i get paid, it makes no difference to me.  

Looks over at the rest of Eurobricks: You guys are getting paid!?!?

[Agent Kallus]

On 4/17/2025 at 8:05 PM, CallumPears said:

One thing I'm trying to remember is when the Mando's N1 and the Spider Tank were revealed directly after their respective episodes did we have any rumour of them beforehand? Could there still be an Andor spoiler set kept under close enough guard to not leak at all? (Huffing the copium hard, I know.) 

Almost definitely not another set, but I nonetheless hope you are right. Got the Andor panel now but I doubt anything Lego related will come up.

Edited April 19 by Agent Kallus

[Darth_Bane13]

1 hour ago, Mandalorianknight said:

The 2005 five tank, if the exact same thing was released today, would be that $150 price the 2025 one was, at 29 fewer pieces. We may trade some larger piece sizes for detail but they overall seem pretty consistent, and would you really want a 2025 set to have the detail of that 2005 one?

The 2010 one is more detailed but would be $180 today off inflation alone. If we wanted to get it up to the 2025 standard for detail we'd be looking at a $200 set.

Personally I'd take the 2005 size and lack of detail. Ideally though I'd like a $200 one as you said, I think enough people would still buy it at that price.

[MaximillianRebo]

3 hours ago, Llewop said:

I wonder if Lego is on a leaker hunt. people see different images, they leak it, either that or it’s something lost in translation maybe or people presuming. I swear we’ve never had a rumour where the figs are consistent but the actual build is so uncertain 

That's my feeling too. It's the equivalent of misplaced punctuation and then seeing which version of the document shows up online and tracing it back to the source.

4 hours ago, JohnTPT17 said:

Let's just call 75413 "Schrödinger's Battle Tank" for now, apparently.

 Exactly. At the end of the day, the set is going to be announced/released and up until that point it could be any variation of Clone vehicle and no amount of Telephone or leak speculation is going to change what ends up on the shelves.

Regarding the Falchion Tank (whether or not that's the actual set), no one is mentioning that it featured in Lego Star Wars III: The Clone Wars. I actually remember it far more from the RTS levels of that game than the Zillo Beast episodes of TCW and Lego would have a model, at least digitally, of that vehicle in their archives if they decided to go that route.

[QuiggoldsPegLeg]

On 4/17/2025 at 3:41 PM, MKJoshA said:

As tariffs concern our Lego purchases now, they are technically on-topic. But please work extra hard to not get political. Both sides of the political spectrum are part of this forum. What unities us is a love for Lego.

Absolutely understand the desire to not have political discussion on a forum about Lego, but saying the reason you’re doing that is to protect the feelings of fascists is absolutely disgusting. 

[Renown]

2 hours ago, QuiggoldsPegLeg said:

Absolutely understand the desire to not have political discussion on a forum about Lego, but saying the reason you’re doing that is to protect the feelings of fascists is absolutely disgusting. 

Or let people say their piece and engage with any talking points. Granted, it's an unfortunate reflection of the current climate that what would otherwise be a new stimulus for discussion has descended into chaos, but this sort of grandstanding does nothing but further entrench these differences. Fighting fire with fire achieves nothing. 

[Nobricksleft]

The rhetoric used by people who want to normalize such things as tariffs is subtle and misleading. Canucks have been on the receiving end of it since January so sorry if we call it as we see it, we are just being honest.

About this new movie with our fellow Canadian actor, it gives us the potential for new starfighter designs, I hope they really innovate. RC and Fondor are great but they are modified cargo ships, we need new frontline models.

 

[ARC2149Nova]

3 hours ago, QuiggoldsPegLeg said:

saying the reason you’re doing that is to protect the feelings of fascists is absolutely disgusting. 

He's just trying to promote peace amongst the new empire forum members. At the end of the day, we focus on the Lego.

Prices have been climbing before any tariff stuff began, so massive increases shouldn't surprise anyone.

In LSW news, I would like to know what's the status of the UT-AT, is it confirmed to be a turbo tank now or is that just conjecture?

[Mandalorianknight]

4 hours ago, BrickPrick said:

My thanks. As long as i get paid, it makes no difference to me.  

By the way, i have been following your career with great interest. I honestly feel honoured to finally be able to join the conversation about them precious pieces of plastic. 

Thank you! Glad to have you here, always good to see some new faces discussing said plastic. I assume from the profile picture you're excited to see the rumored new Cad in the hot rod snowspeeder?

3 hours ago, Darth_Bane13 said:

Personally I'd take the 2005 size and lack of detail. Ideally though I'd like a $200 one as you said, I think enough people would still buy it at that price.

I can understand wanting that, but the design language would be so massively devolved from everything else on shelves that it'd require essentially reverting lego's detail level two decades across most themes to work. (Plus I mean at that point, just bricklink the parts for the 2005 version. I'm not generally a proponent of that, but this is a case where it makes sense to get the parts for the older set- wanting the older design style.)

I know we'll get to $200 eventually, but personally I'd prefer 

3 hours ago, QuiggoldsPegLeg said:

Absolutely understand the desire to not have political discussion on a forum about Lego, but saying the reason you’re doing that is to protect the feelings of fascists is absolutely disgusting. 

Oh cool, this is me, right?* I think I'm the only one who's pushed back on the stuff being said here. Glad I got to see this one before it got taken down.

*Given the level of discussion online, I feel like it's important to clarify that no, obviously I'm not a fascist- and given that that label is usually applied to people as further implication that they're the 1930s german windmill ones, I'll also note that in my real life I publicly spoke out against antisemitism at an institution I was in during a speech (This sounds a lot cooler than it was but I'm being intentionally vague given as people are getting increasingly ugly here, I'd like to ensure my real identity is not found), but it is fun to see the old "___ is fascism" on something like... economic tariffs. 

19 minutes ago, Nobricksleft said:

The rhetoric used by people who want to normalize such things as tariffs is subtle and misleading. 

We've already been told to stop discussing this, but so long as we're doing it anyway and seeing as I just got my shiny new Badge of Being Called A Fascist For Disagreeing On An Unrelated Geopolitical Issue, I feel like it's important to point out that something "subtle and misleading" would be pretending Tariffs AREN'T a thing very many countries have had on eachother very consistently over centuries. Canada had ones on the US before this year. Many of the countries the US is tariffing are ones that had tariffs on the US. As someone else here pointed out, China and Australia are currently in a tariff-laden trade war.

We've actively been told to shift the discussion off tariffs to all the celebration news, but I'm not gonna sit here and be the only one actually listening while other people pretend tariffs are some sort of new abnormal concept and not something countries have been doing to eachother for literal centuries and many civilized nations weren't actively doing to eachother even before this year.

10 minutes ago, ARC2149Nova said:

In LSW news, I would like to know what's the status of the UT-AT, is it confirmed to be a turbo tank now or is that just conjecture?

It was a Turbo Tank and now there's rumors it's a Falchion tank. As others have said, I think the best option is just waiting for lego to reveal it, given at this point it could just be a giant Freeco Speeder or something.

[Llewop]

14 minutes ago, ARC2149Nova said:

He's just trying to promote peace amongst the new empire forum members. At the end of the day, we focus on the Lego.

Prices have been climbing before any tariff stuff began, so massive increases shouldn't surprise anyone.

In LSW news, I would like to know what's the status of the UT-AT, is it confirmed to be a turbo tank now or is that just conjecture?

At this point it is a set with Ki adi Mundi, the commander and some marines and a few hundred pieces of Lego of which its final build is unknown. Let’s say it is whatever you want it to be until it isn’t :) that’s how I’m coping with the mixed uncertain rumors 

with the tariffs let’s just all agree in the current climate it’s an excuse for every single company to shaft us up backside with price increases whatever the motivation for it is, and whatever your background may be (it don’t matter really) and even if you agree/disagree about it we as individuals can’t do anything but find a way to cope. 

I expect the forum going to get frozen/locked for a while now so hopefully no images leak over the next few days lol

Edited April 19 by Llewop

[Mandalorianknight]

Just now, Llewop said:

Let’s say it is whatever you want it to be until it isn’t :)

I can't believe they're finally making Commander Bacara's Stinger Mantis. I just wish they'd included a Greez figure to represent the scene where he sells it to Greez after order 66.

But yes, as you say, all we seem to know are the figures and piece count. I wonder if this is coming from lego giving different sources different lists, and if so, if we're about to lose some leakers. Certainly whoever leaked the Falchion one is being hunted down by lego's anti-leak guy as we speak, there's no pleading coincidence on that one.

[CloneCommando99]

Guys. Stop with the tariff talk and the insults at each other. Even if we don’t agree on political matters we should be civil to one another and just discuss Lego and Star Wars. I don’t want to see this thread lose its friendly nature. 

Back to more light hearted things, Rebuild the Galaxy season 2 got announced

Holy bantha! Lego acknowledged Jaxxon.  Ashley Eckstein is back to voice Brickheadz Ahsoka. And Buildable Chewie is canon to RTG.

Going back to Jaxxon, an obscure legends character, @Mandalorianknight, we both know what the implications of this could mean for season 3. She calls to us.

 

 

@BrickPrick Welcome to Eurobricks. It’s a pleasure to have you

Edited April 19 by CloneCommando99