Anio

The 20 #2903 wheels will be very usefull for UCS. I must get many them. :)

[stupid question on] What do you mean ? (my mother tongue is not English, so, sometimes I misunderstand the posts :( ) [stupid question off]

No. ;) Here is an comprehensive review : http://atixnaid.free.fr/?p=360 Polo reproduced the model thanks to the analysis we did on SeTechnic. And as you can see : - one lever to rise the arm and to extend the cable - the other lever to extend the arm There is no mechanism to rotate the structure. Just like 8421.

Well spoken !!

What the f*** ! The slopes are not even printed !! It seems the Star Wars sets are not yet expensive enough to get printed parts... :skull: Well, thanks for the pics. ;)

Your AT-ST is excellent ! It really looks like a mid-scale UCS version. It is very detailed and the proportions are even better than those of the UCS 10174 (which has too short legs). Congratulations !

If so, they will be disappointed. haha.

Excepted the medical droid, this model is a fail, just like many of those which have been released during the past 2 years... Thanks for the pictures anyway.

+1

How do you know that 10212 is UCS ? Where do you read it ? I were so glad to see a new UCS from TLG...

I bought a 6209 1 hour ago. I am very impatient to get it !

IMO, 6209 is the best Slave 1. BY FAR. edit : it also looks too shiny because the windscreen is trans-clear. What a stupid idea to put a trans-clear windscreen.

This TT is great ! The chassis is very well designed ! Congratulations !

Nobody knows ?

Very nice pics !! Does Boba have blue clothes in the movie ? Or is it a Clone Wars version of Boba Fett ?

Beautiful ! The mechanisms of your MOC are just beautiful !!

This MOC is well done (and funny), sure, but... "One of ther coolest MOC I have ever seen" => You never browse Brickshelf ? O_o Besides, the vid is far too long in order to show only 2 functions.

IMO, compared to the 6209, the new slave one is pathetic. Besides, the DBG 2903 wheels of the Juggernaut are very interesting. I want them !

Thanks ! ;) If you want to use my other vids for your other UCS reviews, you're welcome. Yeah. Excepted for the display card, I never apply them.

Congratulations for this reveiw, Rufus ! ;) I afford to give the link to a vid I did : Otherwise, IMO, it is a very good UCS set, sure, but not among the best one's. - the rear black cooling wings are very very clumsy. It strikes me a lot. With plates and SNOT, the result would have been so much better. - the Snowspeeder has few advanced building technics compared to other UCS (10019, 7191). Bricks are fun, but I want more complexity when I build a UCS.

Oups, sorry. I had the speederbike in mind. Thanks for the pic !

Link ? Otherwise, you mean in the AT-AT, don't you ?

Wrong. It will be as poor as the 8264. You may find some ideas there : http://www.setechnic.com/Forum/topic2845.html

As it has 815 parts, il will costs at least 90€. I let you convert that into £. ;)