Anio

I don't have seen the new AT-AT on the frontpage. So, I assume you don't have any picture of it yet. Sorry if I'm wrong. If I'm right, here is the new AT-AT I found on my forum (thanks to Lutin) : The legs are quite ugly IMHO. They are too clumsy and have no printed dish. :o EDIT : we can see hinge on the sides : the model has an interior. :o That's cool !

When Oxycrest make a sticker, he isolates the model. With photoshop, he makes the background transparent (I don't mean white, I really mean transparent). And then, he uses this file as a layer on photoshop. Example on my AT-TE :

Eventually, did you isolated the model with any soft ?

IMO, you shouldn't put PF in a UCS MOC. ;) Anyway, if you put PF, you need a M motor, a IR receiver, a battery box, and a remote control.

+1 I recognize some of my photos. And without any credits of course. What disrespect!

I totally agree with you Blakbird. That is exactly my opinion.

The genuine set is much better, by far. Especially because it has no PF.

Yeah, a bad surprise.

Actually, it seems that TLG seems to be unable to provide us true innovation. We have been waiting 10 years to see the clutch+driving ring+clutch. And we will probably have to wait 10 years again to see a subtractor or Sariel's autovalve in a model. TLG force-feed us with PFS to hide the lack of innovation (the leds are the most useless innovation I've seen in the past 10 years -_-). Yeah, some models must have motors. But not all. Definitely not all.

I want to feel the models in my hands. I want to play with them. I want to be the one who gives life to the models. In this context, 8460 is just a perfect model. If I want to press buttons, I just switch on my Playstation.

"The thing I don't like about motors" What I don't like about motors is that they nearly in all the models !!! This year, with 4 "big" models, we have : - 8049 can have one motor - 8053 can have one motor (I'm sure of it ) - 8043 have 4 motors - 8042 have one motor - only the epic fail 8041 has NO motor. In the past years, this is the same. 2009 : - 8258 have one motor - 8264 have one motor - 8265 can have one motor - only 8263 and 8063 (another epic fail ) have NO motor. 2008 : - 8292 have one motor - 8295 can have one motor - 8294 can have one motor - 8297 have one motor. I'm fed up with all these fuc***g motors everywhere. I want knobs.

The best MOCer who build his models in a way which is close to TLG' one : http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?m=nico71 These MOCs wouldn't be so expensive.

Please, delete my message. Actually, I misunderstood what you were talking about.

It is impressive. To build it you may have use advanced technics and work a lot. Nevertheless, I don't like it. The ship himself is ugly, imho. Great job anyway. And if it appeals to you, it's the essential. ;)

No. The Venator is trong.

Polo did a great job ! ;) I'm a bit surprised. Is there anybody to confirm that ?

In each files (the tail, the left wing, etc...), you have to switch off all the parts. Then, you switch on them step by step, with the light icon. :) For the missing parts, look at peeron, and try to find the .dat file in the upper left hand corner. Example : http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/3022

This is not me who posted the instruction. ;) It is Polo. Take the latest version. It should be ok. Here is my Venator with the sticker (so, now it is 100% finished) : And I redid the sticker of the AT-TE.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=dl+mlcad

No. Yes. :) Dunno. Try the both !

It is available. In the first post. ;)

You should have reproduce Phalanx for the contest !!

Mahjqa, are you fan of Shadow of the Colossus ? BTW, awesome MOC !

Why does everybody "steal" TB's articles ? If I were Conchas, I were just feed up with seeing that. -_-'

By Oxycrest, of course.