Jump to content

Hinckley

Root Administrator
  • Posts

    35,896
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hinckley

  1. Heather has just called me a liar in private. Heather, I encourage you to explain that here. I have nothing to hide and I'm not a fan of waiting for people to explain themselves. I haven't lied about anything. So what's up?
  2. Fred, may I suggest you have a bit of tunnel vision on Daisy. She did give us "I'm totally Scum" which we could've tested. It wouldn't have cleared her of SK which we've seen no evidence of. Nobody watched him. Where are you getting this? And why haven't you answered my earlier question ?
  3. I stand by my assertion that Jane would make a good big kill. We can't get her to respond or pay attention. Killing her would get her off our suspect list. The difference is I'm not at all sure she's Scum as you claimed to be. The odd thing you said was if Trish was Town then that's what made you think Jane was Scum. That's what I'd like to hear more explanation of. I don't see how Teish being Town incriminates Jane more. Everyone scrutinize me, please. I welcome it.
  4. Scummy scummy scum-pants. Scummy-poo! Scummy-poo! Scummy-scummy-scum-pants!! Sorry, hedgehogs are notoriously sing-songy-pokey-loo.
  5. Respond to my last post! And Zara is dead! She probably won't be responding. :wall:
  6. You didn't understand the clarification. Walter didn't target anyone. He was blocked! Stop reading those summaries you lazy human! They're not even accurate let alone substantial to understand what's happening. If you're just reading summaries...that suck...how can you catch people in lies. Don't be lazy! We'll kill you!
  7. No. Walter was not seeing targeting me. Walter was blocked and therefore wouldn't be seen doing anything. Daisy saw the person who investigated me targeting me. So someone has claimed investigator. If there's another one out there, you may want to tell someone you trust in case the first one, the one that confirmed me, is lying to us. And the lunch Action is a one-shot watch. They see who ever targeted their target, but just who, not what they did. This particular weak watcher only shows the "first" person to target the target, whatever that means. Can the others with the watcher clarify this with God? That's what Daisy told me, so I'd like to know if that's corroborated. Actually, someone else already did. Who was that?
  8. It actually could be coincidence. What makes you think it's not? You didn't just wonder about the theft, you clearly listed her as one of your suspects. Why would you suspect Penny for having her lunch stolen and then try to make us believe that's not what you meant?
  9. And the other thieves who claimed? There were three people who claimed to have a lunch that allowed them to steal other people's lunches. Bullies.
  10. What about it then? Several people claimed to have their lunches stolen and we know why. Anyone who chose steak in the signup got a thief action. Hello? Walter didn't realize this either.
  11. I've contacted Walter in private and the results aren't satisfactorily quieting any suspicions. Nom nom nom Hey! I didn't even read that one!
  12. No, I found your summary rather special because it came so late and wasn't really accurate. But that's not really evidence just gut feelings on things. No Scum kill, you were blocked. That's something. You didn't declare you were aligned with the Town until after the lie detector was de-bunked either. You said you'd find a way for it to be fool-proof but you didn't claim until after Trisha admitted she didn't have one. God, Trisha was weird. Sorry, Trisha. Shouldn't speak ill of the dead. Hedgehogs are very charismatic. Night Actions are way different than lunches. What lunch did you have? Daisy has only stated about 1000 times that she watched me with her lunch but that she has no Action otherwise. I wouldn't hire you as a summarizer because you seem to lack an understanding of what's going on. Maybe you're distracted talking with the Scum team about your kill being blocked. Maybe you're not fully reading the day thread because only getting to the night phase to try out your Scummy Actions again is all that seems important to you. I don't know. You're usually super smart. I don't expect this type of thing from you, metagamey as that may be. Venison is also rather metagamey. I don't care for it.
  13. Another note! Did you guys read that? Walter (WaterbrickDown) professional summarizer and lame lie detector plan setter was blocked last night. No Scum kill, Scummy hedgehog-hating Walter blocked. Hmmmm....
  14. Good analysis. Something feels way off on Jimmy. It's been the reactions and defensiveness that have seemed really out of place. All based off of that little "pretty sure" in the private communication. Just a seed of doubt, but Jimmy has watered it into a little sapling for us to consider our vote over... Way to summarize. After yesterday's lackluster "I'll find a way for the lie detector to test everyone at once, where's my pen? Oh, I spent some time and it wouldn't really work" tactic, you've come in today to tell us what happened. That's real helpful for the lazy Townies who don't like to read, but outside of your character a bit. Did Daisy deny the watcher role? Where? And what "occupation" are you referring to? Did you come to these conclusions yourself because they've been discussed at length already and been brought to much stronger conclusions than the half-hearted analysis you just gave us. Not behavior I would expect from one of the most analytical brains here. Ping. Ping from you. Another one. That's like three. Oh, a note: Lady Dolores, that is uncalled for metagaming. Don't start this shit. We're trying to play nice for once. So what if Shadell is super Scummy. Play nice. Honestly. Sorry Shadell, my invisible human girlfriend is kind of rude sometimes...Scumbag. Was this in private or in the thread?
  15. I don't think it needs a light brick. The open back would be nice. I think as long as it fits in, style wise, it'll do just fine. I'm not sure how we'd disqualify anything on that rule. It's mostly the concept. A space station would be inappropriate. It should look warm and villagey. I guess...
  16. I don't like many horses but I'm particularly tired of those big black ones that fly under the radar. If it was time to vote I'd gladly place a vote for Wild Dragon (Dragonator). Speaking once, even if you are a horse and aren't used to talking yet, we'd help with that but we fed the vet to the dogs, and not even bothering to vote doesn't help anyone. What's the matter with you? Scum got your tongue?
  17. Matilda, black hat, what? What about Jimmy doesn't add up well for you?
  18. Horses are nice from a distance but I hate them up close. Their feet crush hedgehog brains. Not. Funny.
  19. A motive for what? Killing the two horses that died in the confirmation thread? You think that's how these games work? Give me a break. You're much smarter than that.
  20. I have no siblings. They were all stepped on by horses.
  21. This is a good point. After calling out Mike for his lame vote yesterday he contacted me letting me know that he was engaged and didn't want me to think he was lazy. Since he assumed he would be lynched before long, he said he'd give me his lunch to try and prove that he was working for the Town. Moments later, the cookies came. Yes, this could be a ploy to get me to trust him. No, I have not given him any information I haven't given out in the thread.
  22. True. But, this also means that if you have a real Action, you can't pretend it was a lunch. We now know that all the lunches are standard based on what we chose in the sign-up thread. Well, we don't know, but it looks pretty clear to me at this point.
×
×
  • Create New...