def

One might say that, but they'd be completely wrong. Keep up going after Alice. I have no opinion on her.

Sorry, you weren't pushing for Jordan. My mistake. Of course, I had little focus on Mary as well, so I don't get why you're making that out otherwise, except as a distraction...

What focus on Mary? I threw a vote out for her. I didn't push for her lynch whatsoever. I changed my vote for Jordon close to days end, so that dialogue could continue, and before I went to bed. This is pretty transparent to me, that your sudden suspicions about me surfaced the moment I said you were looking scummy. Convenient timing. Put on a show, distract the crowd...

Sorry, repeatedly asking, and complaining about asking isn't 'hammering,' it's just going on about something not particularly relevant. Mary is a so-so candidate for lynch. She's not clear. Perhaps the lynch on Jordan was to save her. Don't know. I find your behavior today worrisome, as with the push for the lynch on Jordan. You're awfully aggressive today, simply from a little, light accusation.

I don't know. I threw out a day one vote early. It wasn't a particularly deep consideration. It's called day one. Maybe you've heard of it... Wait, you totally have, and you hammering at that point is scummy, since everybody knows the first vote isn't a big thing. No, you said I was up for lynching. You said I was scummy according to Jonathan. If you want to lynch me, you need to take credit ----- Nevermind that, I didn't read that well enough.

Sorry, why am I a candidate? Because I said Jonathan was a candidate That's pretty ridiculous. Jonathan really wanted to push this 'set number = affiliation' business when any sensible person knows that would only be in a broken game... Luckily the head honcho stepped in and put an end to it (even though it is a total host faux-pas, since scum need to be able to disinform players with bogus theories). Just another reason to see Jonathan being actually scummy, as opposed to his finger-pointing at me which is simply based on self-preservation. He was trying to lead you all down a dead-end.

Huh? I'm voicing suspicion, not claiming to speak for the town. Defensive much?

No shit? You don't feel you're scum? I didn't see that twist coming. In lieu of a more concrete candidate, you'll be getting my vote today. You have nothing to worry about if you're town and the rest feel the same about you

I didn't think Jordan was scum, but it seemed a waste to not have a lynch day one Today, I'm somewhat sure Jonathan is scum. No investigation, just a strong scummy vibe going off there. Does anyone else feel it?

Picked this up today, and I'm satisfied with it. The ship is nicely designed, and the disc-missiles are a great substitute for the decade of flick-fire ones we've had. It was simply good quality for a good price. And Oky, making fun of Aquaman is the equivilant of making fun of airline food in the 80's. Shooting fish in a barrel. You're better than that

I find the complaints here baffling. This looks sweet It'll be a hard purchase since LEGO has built up a number of annual releases at a high price. But, it's on my radar, and I may buy it.

It's safe to say you are either vanilla or scum then?

Alright, to satisfy people's apathy, Unvote Mary (Boywonder) Vote Jordan (Tamamono) Sorry Jordan, I think this is for the best, in order to have peace of mind.

Yes, I sleep when night comes. Are you implying it is 'funny' to sleep at night? It's very dark where I am. That means it's night. And the case is Mary vs Jordan. A vote for Alice at this point would be blatantly scummy since it's the same as throwing away your vote (which is why voting should always be mandatory... it forces people to somewhat play). Let's vote for Timmy tomorrow.

Going to bed soon... To change votes or not change votes. I'm not getting a particularly scummy read on Jordan, though he did over-react. That's been his unpleasant thing, I guess. We all have our demons. Unless any passionate defenses come up in the next couple of hours, I'll switch up my vote before I pass out and put the nail in Jordan's coiffy coffin.

I don't think we'll learn anything from any of them until they're all dead, and even then, only if one is scum. We can only learn so much from bandwagons, and usually it's that people can be sheep.

We have a dozen hours, plenty of time to change. I will be sleeping at the day's end, though.

This: Yes.

Um, it is a place many of us here were, and it has to do with this situation in that many people had Personal Messages describing things of a personal nature, like 'ticket numbers.' Would you like it spelled out in more detail for you, personally, George? George? Your name is George, right? Like, your name is not Legonator in any way, right? It's George. Would you like directions to Heartlake, George? I'll draw you a map in crayon, if you need one. George. Where is Heartlake indeed...

Honestly, well past my n00b status, I've managed to overlook details in a role, particularly in the first 48 hours. Until my name is in my sig, I'm likely to forget it, and even after, especially when I have a 'name' with zero connection to my 'name.' Not a defense of anyone at all, but I would never go after someone for not knowing those sort of details on day one. Hell, in Heartlake, it was at least day two before I noticed the name my 'lunch' had. I'd read it, but hadn't noticed some details. Whatever scum tells I see on Jordan are in reactions to accusations, and not into his initial behaviour. We'll see what happens toward the end of day one.

Are you saying that we all have thought through our votes? Because that's not what day one voting is about. There has been no werewolf today. You just go on a hunch. For the record, I think Jordan is a fair lynch today too. But I won't complain if no lynch is reached either. It's hard to tell the difference between scumminess and simple bafflement at how to approach a situation like this.

http://www.eurobricks.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=79506&st=150#entry1518738

Honestly Jordan, we have no idea what a building contest is. That is a reason to guard our private info.

I don't think it will reveal scum at all, but there could be roles or secret factions that need to find pieces or something. Who knows? I personally don't see the point of everyone sharing info that is private, and that we don't know the relevance of, when it's possible there are some who do know and it may be useful to them. It's possible some here have made themselves a night action target simply by revealing their sets. Again though, who knows? Maybe they were only window dressing. In the first Bloodbrick, five different rooms were assigned randomly, but that was for the purpose of giving hints and clues that wouldn't be too overly revealing. Let's give it a day to see if there's any meaning behind them.

Paul, I totally agree that the ticket numbers shouldn't lead to any clues, but I can think of two situations where the designer purposely went against that (hogwarts and yakuza), so faith in randomness depends on your faith in the designer.