jimmynick

@ Female Lover Godfather accuses me of feeling guilty about ML lynch You bring up PM indicating Godfather is scum I conclude that Godfather is trying to make me look like scum, but he knows I'm town.

Why not convince us that ML is a bad lynch? Why not poke PGO if you're interested in him?

No, I just feel responsible for ML's lynch and think it will go badly for me if he turns out to be town (which I sincerely doubt). What do you have to say about the Female Lover's potato evidence? To me, it sounds like you're trying to stir up dirt on me. Also, that you're scum.

'Cause I voted first. And NPC (and Godfather) questioned my motives.

Oh yeah, if Male Lover comes up town, I'm in trouble. At least I'm only vanilla!

I don't think there's support for those lynches today. BONAD and vig thought that The Witch must be the SK. Not just BONAD was at fault for this reasoning, and I'm fairly sure the claimed vig is town. You wanted to know why BONAD had changed his attention. It's because his and the vig's idea that The Witch must be the bulletproof SK had a much simpler explanation. No case against The Witch directly due to night actions. Doesn't preclude BONAD or The Witch from actually being scum. BONAD's change in behaviour makes sense today, but it didn't yesterday. Male Lover had inconsistent statements and was convinced that the vig metagamed The Cop when it was already abundantly clear that the vig had not killed last night. No, but there are plenty of reasons apart from being the bulletproof SK that the vig might fail to kill you at night. You mean BONAD, Snake Charmer and Jester? There's no support for lynching them today I'm not just going by an admittedly faulty metagame, because there's no meta to go on. It's nothing personal. Male Lover can't decide whether or not the vig killed someone (thinks the vig killed The Cop) and seems to be posting on a content-light basis, "flying under the radar", it's called. I have no plot. What's your point about the PGO, BONAD, Virgin, Jester and Stump? The people I would want to examine more closely now (e.g. Snake Charmer, PGO) are not necessarily those whom the town would feel comfortable lynching today. Lynching is a democratic process. And I'm voting for Male Lover, so I shouldn't really orchestrate a lynch I'm not voting on. I wasn't even on your list earlier. Did writing a "Cliffs Notes" for the day really ping you that much, or are you trying to get something smelly to stick? Also, Re: BONAD and Female Lover: we all know they're in contact with the vig, so if the vig dies in the night they're in deep trouble. I doubt either is scum. Either BONAD or Female Lover, I mean. Of course I think the vig is town.

You're right, the Male Lover doesn't behave like he did at high school. I'm still comfortable with the lynch.

Last time he was scum, he went out in a blaze of glory, but that might have been because he got caught red-handed. Fair enough, everyone. Cultist it is.

I agree with Usurper; this seems like a townie response. There's still 15 hours or so to turn The Cultist's lynch around if that's what people want to do. The problem is, who would we lynch instead?

Snake Charmer and Jester are still moderately suspicious (at least to me) but they aren't the persons of interest today. BONAD got his revelation about The Witch from the person who claimed vig to both him and to the Female Lover. BONAD jumped to the "Witch must be SK conclusion". This was faulty reasoning, since we have protectors, lifesaver pills and Inventors, all of which prevent people from being killed in the night. The Witch claimed lifesaver pill, which was confirmed by Female Lover. To conclude: BONAD is off the hook for today (different situation than yesterday) and it is still possible that The Witch could be scum (or SK), but we have no evidence to support that hypothesis any more. There is no case. And we're lynching the Cultist because he's quitting. How do you feel about the other lynch candidate (Male Lover), whom you did not mention in your list of suspicious people? Great job posting zero insight or content. Ah. And blockers. They can stop people from being killed in the night as well. @ The Doctor: If we decide to lynch someone other than The Cultist because FDY will be allegedly modkilled, I'm behind you all the way on PGO.

Very good! It looks (perhaps) a little too spherical, but the shapes of the outside and the interior are both very evocative of the source material.

Sorry, I'm First Day Lynch and FDY is Fred Daniel Yam == Cultist. I'm relatively satisfied with your answer.

The piece only appeared in white in the UCS Y-wing fighter from a few years ago. A great many more sets had the part in metallic silver. The price for the part in metallic silver is just over $2. My best guess is that there aren't many of the piece on the market, since it only appeared in one set. If you look at the price records, you'll see that $44 is relatively cheap for this part. So buy it now if it's what you need, because there isn't a ready supply.

I don't follow. Please explain why people with only one fake vote are suspicious. It's an issue of wanting to make clear whom the intended lynchee is without forcing yourself into a corner because of the "only one unvote" thing. It's easy to make scum nervous with fake votes, because they know that the fake votes will probably turn into real votes. The fake votes help us organise and make sure we don't make mistakes and get caught without a changeable vote. As The Doctor said, the pill The Witch took yesterday is consistent with the claim. It gives us more information and stops us from jumping the gun and lynching The Witch without substantial evidence. How do you feel about that? Is the interest in The Cultist's brief activity taking away from legitimate suspicion of the Male Lover? Is that a good thing? Is that a bad thing? Are they both scum? Do you think that the scum are trying to distract us? What new information would we learn from lynching The Cultist, other than merely FDY's alliance? I'm going to get the ball rolling for our second lynch of the day: Unfakevote: Male Lover (LegoDad) Vote: Male Lover (LegoDad) Ah, when I said "substantial evidence" about The Witch, I realised we don't have substantial evidence for anyone. But suggesting that The Witch was the SK was a complete shot in the dark that turns out to be invalid, so we shouldn't lynch The Witch on that reasoning.

Honestly, I'm getting worried about the Male Lover's inconsistent analysis of The Cop's kill last night (scum v. vig / SK v. vig). It's a good bet to say neither of those kills was the vig, since we have someone telling the same story to both BONAD and the Female Lover, and no vig counter-claim seems to have arisen. So Fakevote: Male Lover (LegoDad)

Yes, I understand, but he hasn't shown up today. Hence my Lynch All Lurkers concern.

We don't know for a fact yet, but it's a good guess. There we go, trying to policy-lynch the lurkers. *POKE* Cultist, come out and play!

Was the action unsuccessful (e.g. blocker or doctor) or was there a downer pill in play? Or did the vig choose not to kill in the night?

Good ol' tree stump wrote a post about BONAD's voting yesterday (I also noted BONAD's behaviour) which seems to have been forgotten by the Doctor and the Male Lover when arguing Lynch all Lurkers: Tree Stump is trying to catch scum. He's your prime target. Are you two protecting The Cultist? Are you two also trying to catch scum? Stop being so pill-popping and antisocial! What is your take on policy-lynching inactive players (hint: we shouldn't)? What do you think about the people intending to vote for the Tree Stump again? What do you think of BONAD? *POKE* I, for one, favour Pie (for quietly allowing the lynch to go through) and BONAD (for hammering SK) for the lynches today.

I'll try Rum, please.

No, not in particular. The goon is merely another person who isn't terribly present at the moment. We could policy-lynch everyone, but we'd be screwed then.

2. You're going about this the wrong way. I wanted to tally votes and was comfortable doing so, and I screwed up. Sorry. The Virgin, on the other hand, voted for the SK whilst saying he was not comfortable doing so. Different situations. 3. False. The Cultist was, to me, scummier than the SK which is why I moved my vote from the SK to the Cultist. I was never vocal about the importance of NOT tying the vote; instead, I called the Virgin out for breaking a tie whilst being uncomfortable and clueless Usurper was the one who didn't want a tied vote. I mean, I felt a little bit bad about tying the vote, but I didn't see the Cult Leader's post because I was in the middle of posting my own vote. @ Doctor: Do you want to policy-lynch the tree stump but not the Cultist, or do you also want to lynch him? What about the goon, who hasn't been around today? Or the NPC?

Thanks for the concise explanation everyone seemed to be missing.