Jump to content

1gor

Eurobricks Grand Dukes
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    7,902

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 1gor

  1. 1gor
    You can always use typical V8 engine, because today's trend is to downsize engine displacement and number of cylinders...
  2. 1gor
    Perhaps it would be to expensive, 18 wheels with suspension, engine...parts almost as BWE, long as almost 2 42043 sets...that would be real beast
  3. 1gor
    Agree, yellow ones are hard so they will be better at the front
  4. 1gor
    Jag is taking shape, really nice. I also prefer black rims
  5. 1gor
    Thanks anyway. Good intentions are important
  6. 1gor
    Well my set 42043 has 62.4 tires so I was a bit confusef. thanks
  7. 1gor
    I'm a bit confused, but can you please explain 64 tires? Thank you. Sorry for a bit off-topic
  8. 1gor
    @Jurss, interesting find. I have totally forgot about that
  9. 1gor
    smart decision
  10. 1gor
    Thanks @TechnicRCRacer it looks like simple nice sets (from parts point of view)
  11. 1gor
    I have to apologize, but you were right - there is small turntable in this set https://rebrickable.com/sets/42071-1/dozer-compactor/#parts
  12. 1gor
    I understand what you mean. I just have thought that you can connect ball joint and frame with diagonal placed beams...
  13. 1gor
    ...and are never satisfied... There is one rule - difference between man and boy is in the price of toy ...so the more sofisticated - more expensive... To (somehow) keep orange cones in place? There is probably simple explanation.
  14. 1gor
    Perhaps you should build it like Unimog U400 only with big ball joint inverted and without portal hubs. Frame 5 x 7 could be connected with ball joint like on your posted image above...
  15. 1gor
    It is a bit small image... Yes it could end in loosing lots of customers
  16. 1gor
    You're not the only one...few minutes I found image where sides are opening on first responder...
  17. 1gor
    It is cheaper to change just a spring than whole shock absorber...hm but rally car has yellow ones...
  18. 1gor
    Based on wehicle weight it should be soft
  19. 1gor
    It is off topic, but that is my philosophy, so at least I've ended up with few mocs that are optimal IMHO But I suggest now we can go back to 2018 sets discussion, if you want to have discussion about my building philosophy, you should send me a PM
  20. 1gor
    This is most realistic idea for rear suspension and @Lipko gave you very good suggestion how to make it stronger that should be mandatory
  21. 1gor
    My philosophy is if you can not make proper representation of some (sub)system, don't do it - example I do not know how to make hydrostatic CVT from LEGO, so I make models without transmission. Perhaps LEGO wanted to show us principle of pdk with Porsche, but as @Meatman said order is completely wrong and we have end-result of 4 forward and 4 reverse speeds except 7 forward and 1 reverse speed... If 43.2 wheel would be used than I suppose this tire https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=41897#T=C&C=11 is what you have in mind. It could be good, but proportions in comparison to panels would be different, if not to complicated...I don't know about that honestly.
  22. 1gor
    I understand your point and I still think that pdk transmission on Porsche should have been 7 speed + R Or perhaps they'll make solar car (that would be interesting for Australian market - they have lots of sun...) About Tesla, it would be better to make elektromobiles by Rimac Welcome to Eurobrics forum
  23. 1gor
    It looks nice and simple
  24. 1gor
    This would be huge buggy
  25. 1gor
    Agree
×
×
  • Create New...