Jump to content

Trekkie99

Eurobricks Dukes
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,134

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Trekkie99

  1. Trekkie99
    That's what I'm hoping for @Mark Bellis. A Bluetooth enabled receiver + remotes, and of course the option of using an app instead to control your model from your smart device or notebook. Everything else about the current PF system is fine the way it is currently IMO. But then on the flip side, it would be nice to have the receiver function compacted in to the battery box to save space.
  2. Trekkie99
    What's your opinion on Power Functions 2.0, and the potential that we may or may not have a separate receiver unit for the new system? Do you want a separate receiver unit like what we have currently, or do you want a combo unit composing of both a receiver unit and a battery box? Also, how important is a separate receiver unit to you? (Shoot. It appears the poll isn't working.) My personal opinion is the following. 1: Sort of. 2: Sort of. 3: Sort of necessary.
  3. Trekkie99
    Hopefully if the plug design changes, Lego will continue to use the current PF motors, just with the new plug design.
  4. Trekkie99
    The thing is though is that Technic builders might need a separate receiver unit. Which makes me think that all "PF 2.0" will be is a new receiver unit.
  5. Trekkie99
    Well whatever's in store for PF 2.0, I hope nothing drastic changes. For example, I hope we'll still have an XL motor with the same features such as torque, pin holes, etc. Otherwise, my monorail designs are doomed!
  6. Trekkie99
    (Oh, thanks. "Me dumb noob!" )
  7. Trekkie99
    Either Amanda is town and she doesn't care, or she's scum and she knows the jig is up. I for one am going with the latter. And if she is scum, I bet she's going to be out for some revenge tonight before she gets hauled away in the paddy wagon in the morning.
  8. Trekkie99
    3 hours, 20 minutes I believe? 4 votes for Amanda, 2 votes for Anthony.
  9. Trekkie99
    Her silence is why some have voted for her in the first place. How has she "split the vote"?
  10. Trekkie99
    We're calling on Amanda because she's been flying under the radar. And that is suspicious behavior. Right?
  11. Trekkie99
    Anthony is not scum IMO.
  12. Trekkie99
    Yes! I want to see Lego make a shunter so bad!
  13. Trekkie99
    Thanks! I'm surprised you noticed that little detail in the thrusters. Pneumatic hose has a lot of fun uses!
  14. Trekkie99
    A little Mtron speeder I built awhile back. Enjoy! Cheers. LMF.
  15. Trekkie99
    Here are the pictures. Should be pretty easy to replicate for those interested. Regards. LMF.
  16. Trekkie99
    Thanks @Asper! Yes! I've seen that design, and it is one smooth sailing monorail! Very impressive!
  17. Trekkie99
    So last night I remembered a very common return to center steering design that looks like this picture below, and I thought I'd adopt it for this scenario. Instead or a rubber band, I used springs. The end result works quiet well actually. I'll post a picture or two when I get the chance.
  18. Trekkie99
    Let's get this ball rolling. Vote: Amanda Callahan (Khscarymovie4)
  19. Trekkie99
    Updated! My Lego monorail switch track is now up on my Flickr. Link to full album is on the main post of this topic. I've taken plenty of pictures so it'll be easy for people to copy the design. (Not that there's anything complex about the it. ) My intention when building the switch was to make an extremely simplified version of Masai Hidaka's switch design, and I think it works pretty good. Cheers. LMF.
  20. Trekkie99
    Just saw this on Flickr. Awesome MOC! Thumbs up!
  21. Trekkie99
    Sweeeeet!!! Thanks so much! This should work perfect. Maybe? But isn't that a rare piece?
  22. Trekkie99
    Cool! Thanks so much man!
  23. Trekkie99
    Wow, that's pretty cool! However, I was thinking a spring mechanism that allows the switch to turn on for both directions.
  24. Trekkie99
    I was curious if there is a way to make the PF switch (part #bb339c01), spring loaded so it will function like the basic PF remote (part #58122c01). Understandably I can operate the switch by hand to do the same thing, but I thought it would be a fun function to add to the switch. I was thinking someone had probably already accomplished this way better than I ever could, but if not I guess it's back to the drawing board.
  25. Trekkie99
×
×
  • Create New...