Jump to content

Kaanere

Eurobricks Knights
  • Posts

    707
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Kaanere

  1. Milan would be cool! A possible skyline could be Il Duomo, Sforzesco Castle, Torre Velasca, Teatro alla Scalla, and the Pirelli Tower.
  2. It's not unheard of: However, the i8 is now a somewhat old car, and its successor is rumored to be released in 2022/23. I don't see TLG releasing one.
  3. Has this particular leaker leaked reliable info on the past? This seems unlikely. Most licensed Technic sets have depicted very modern vehicles. I don't expect them to make al classic car at this point, especially for a model without a direct successor and an automaker that TLC has never worked with. However, they sort of have a precedent with the Creator 007 Aston Martin of releasing a car with both a manufacturer and a movie license, so I don't see that part as much of a strech. The double license can also bring fans from both properties to the set. But, as always, don't forget the grain of salt.
  4. Hope they mean this Tokyo Tower and not these Tokyo Towers.
  5. Probably not if the set only has 130 pieces. I'd expect something closer to the 42088 Cherry Picker or the 42071 dozer: a small set with basic functions and details.
  6. Dark red is still red (pardon me if it's actually some obscure shade of orange). But still, the grain of salt.
  7. As allways, don't forget to take everything with a grain of salt. For instance, we don't even have descriptions for the 1H sets! What do you mean with "wingdoors"? Gull-wing doors? In that case, wikipedia only lists two current production cars with gull-wing doors: the Pagani Huayra and the Tesla Model X.
  8. As far as I know, TLC has never put a lockable diff in a set, so I wouldn't expect them to do it now. And, like @suffocation said, lockable diffs have the potential to damage the transmission since most people wouldn't even notice their existence or function.
  9. Great creation! But the Ideas link isn't working for me.
  10. The difference between a luggage box and a coffin is what you put inside it.
  11. What happened to the Lego DOTS theme? Could it have abything to do with these?
  12. I doubt it will neeed the hub and CV joints if it's a smaller model.
  13. Not at all? I mean, who doesn't like small, unstable, british microcars?
  14. After a quick research it seems that the 107 Fat Boy was released in 2018! Can this be a precedent for more modern vehicles on the Creator Expert vehicle series?
  15. I guess that they didn't want to make exactly the same suspension as in many previous sets, so they changed it up a bit.
  16. It (and another turntable in the middle of the chassis) does have an usage: to articulate the chassis so as to increase suspension travel. This function doesn't really need a motor
  17. It's a bit late to say that: https://brickset.com/sets/3451-1/Sopwith-Camel That set was released in 2001 and was later remade in 2011.
  18. That battery box seems to have two switches. Wonder if future sets will make use of both.
  19. The tracks of the loader have track tensors! (shock absorvers)
  20. I don't think that the 42096 will be on the same scale, it's half the cost of the bigger one.
  21. Not exactly Technic, but it's based on Technic elements anyway: There's a new experimental theme (?), Lego FORMA: https://brickset.com/article/38738/lego-forma-unveiled! Apparently it's testing new forms of releasing sets and themes though crowdfunding... or something like that.
  22. Like this: https://brickset.com/sets/42031-1/Cherry-Picker ? That set wasn't released that long ago, I don't see them releasing yet another small cherry picker even if the previous one is retired. Besides, they have never released a proper scissor lift platform (Apart from 8109 B, but that one is supposed to be an airport truck, so slightly different).
  23. The 42096 GT racecar has more pieces than the 42039, probably to continue the trend of increased details. On the other hand, 42094 doesn't seem very big, especially considering that it is a tracked vehicle. Nothing else out of the ordinary, really.
  24. My first though was that they would be the 2H numbers, and four sets seem reasonable for that. It would be weird to invert the numbers, though, but it won't the first time they don't follow the usual pattern (42000 and 42084 come to mind).
×
×
  • Create New...