Jump to content

YellowCorvette

Eurobricks Counts
  • Posts

    1,051
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by YellowCorvette

  1. Hello and welcome!
  2. About the new 2016 Ultrabuild sets, my opinion on them is as same like in the link below: http://www.eurobricks.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=110628&st=150#entry2369627
  3. From the pictures, Lewa looks the best and Lewa's color scheme worked the best in among the Toa's. The others are nice too, but their color scheme (especially Tahu) and mask design (Especially Gali and Tahu) looks weird. Onua and Kopaka are now growing on me, and some of the creatures are also nice too.
  4. Yes, that is a nice set, but it's very unfortunate that the function isn't very stable consider the size of the set. Same like DraikNova, I also want some droids been done in CCBS, but I prefer to have droids like B2 Super Battle Droid, B1 Battle Droid and R2-D2 to been done in CCBS cooperated with Technic parts.
  5. I only own one Microfighter for now, but the FO Snowspeeder microfighter is very accurate to the source and it's definetly a worthy buy for me.
  6. The Technic build on the 2016 sets didn't bother me as much as before, but however my problem with the Technic build on some of the sets is the integration of both Technic and CCBS parts on some of the sets looks messy and didn't look right with the texture of the CCBS parts.
  7. The Tire Escape set looks good, but I didn't like the gap on the neck because of the design of the life jacket.
  8. Great MOC! There's only one word that I can use to describe your MOC, that is....Impressive!
  9. Hello and welcome to Eurobricks, Kafi.
  10. Hello and welcome, Micah.
  11. Is that a polybag? It's very well designed and accurate to the original version.
  12. The Falcon looks great, but the height of the landing gears of the Falcon are too high of the Falcon and detracts the overall look of the Falcon when in landing mode.
  13. The Batmobile looks great. Can't wait to see the finished result.
  14. The sets definitely look better now, but my opinion still remain the same like before.
  15. That is suppose to represent the pilot cabin of the FO Transporter.
  16. That is suppose to represent the inverted triangular design of the front of the FO Transporter.
  17. errors
  18. No. That's a mini version of a FO Transporter.
  19. finished
  20. flying
×
×
  • Create New...