Jump to content

efferman

Eurobricks Grand Dukes
  • Posts

    6,002
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by efferman

  1. bad news guys: the Vid of the new revision must wait. i have a big design error in the drivetrain. The Weight of the complete AT-AT is to heavy and the legs are losing their synchronisation. unfortunately i need now a complete redesign. Dont use the old one, it will collapse.
  2. holy moly, is this a huge head a new vid will come tomorrow good night
  3. Currently iam working at the second version. the chassis is more stable, more compact, and the ALS is added. it hink the added hull (hopefully not ugly) is additional weight enough. that is no design project, it must only work properly. The design comes when iam have bought the set.
  4. yes, it looks really wobbly i think the decission, to let the head moving with the steering, was a good one. so it could look in the direction that i want. Thanks Milan Inventing with lego technic is pure relaxing for me. maybe this is the reason.
  5. Sorry for the doubleposting, but i think it is worth it walks and steers, but it is not perfect. the Ms are to wide in front: they collide with base of the hull. this will solved in the next revision the turning Circle is a little bit big: this will be solved by the all leg steering. the colours of the legs are wrong: i have said it would not looks like an AT-AT
  6. i try that the backside is compatible, but i could nothing promise. big edit: it fits to the rear leg construction of the 10178. Currently i didnt know if the battery box fits. tommorow i will built the legs and i try a little testwalk The Brickshelf Folder of this mod (when it is online)
  7. there is no big difference. if you wait for my chassis, let the rear axle simply like the original.
  8. only the front legs? a little bit boring i think. the head will shakes not independent. i try to turn the head to the left, when the AT-AT is turning left.
  9. iam currently working at a complete chassis, including headshaking. what do you think, all legged steering or only front leg steering?
  10. i think i have a solution that not kills the design i hope this hint is enough, if not i could make a complete walking thing. but i didnt have the 10178 and it will not look like an AT-AT
  11. it makes it easier, but i think the space that you have in the at-at, is too small for a steering system, and a movable weight.
  12. basically yes. but be aware about the center of gravity. 4 legged walkers are delicate to balance @milan, that is a good point.
  13. articulated steering means this, sorry for the dark vid ok it is a six legger, but the system is the same here some pics edit: this is an other posibility, but it needs many turntables pics
  14. i hope that you are right with this construction. sorry for my pessimism, but i think with all load (Crane and payload) over one stabilizer, you will have a problem. not specialy with the outriggerbox, but with the connection between the cylinder and the outriggerbox. Did i see right that you use the Hose connection, for the connection to the outriggerbox?
  15. looks nice but have you no fear that the outriggers will be twisted under load?
  16. currently my job is something different. Suction Excavators
  17. yes, it is nearly unique. from the W.E.M.B. 109 (Wolf, Effer, Mafi, Biedenbach) We had built only two Cranes. with its 1,8m width, 2,8m height it fits through the most Factory doors.
×
×
  • Create New...