efferman

Yes, please do it.

I have indeed a disc like this.

Ok, they were faster than me when this is correct.

The tires and the Cab are 1:20, the width is around 1:18

OK, there is a unicorn. My fault.

One suggestion, remove two of the pistons of the straight six. All of the Unimogs have 4 cylinder engines

The crane is much to large for this position. I think this looks totaly out of proportions. Made in IO an incomplete chassis with my portals based on the 42242 https://bricksafe.com/files/efferman/u5023/42242.io Next two of the straight six cylinders will removed. The U 5023 has only 4cylinder engines. The Steering link needs a different position.

The Rim is printed, because as i stated befor the 8Z doesnt fit to the original Rim. the rotation doesnt change with this setup, but the reduction makes a rear portal neccessary too. The part in the center is to connect, in a space saving way, the left and right side without the risk of dismantling under pressure.

24 teeths on the inner side of the rim. So the rim is like one of the old Turntables.

It jumps a bit on 35 Degrees, so it should a bit limited.

It works. Includes a 3:1 reduction

The Pickup is wonderfull.

The Steering Scrub Radius would be much to large for a model of this size. Edit: i think i have a solution. The first print runs

The Rim of the Set is much to small in diameter. Even 8/8 would not fit.

The L beam which supports the shocks does not limit the steering angle? Btw, the hub seems to work.

The balljoints were an old wrong way with weird dimensions. The ackerman geometry limits the steeringangle to roughly 30 degree to one side.

Iam trying to develop a hub with a proper steering angle.

Sometimes the partcount is simply because of the size. CaDA for example want a partcount as low as it is reasonable. And when the look takes profit for more parts, they accept a higher partcount. Don't understand me wrong, the partcount is clearly on third place in importance after look and functions, so, when i would build my actual project as a MOC it would probably have 500 to 1000 parts more, because i don't look on the partcount. Iam sure TLG thinks in the same way, But luckily CaDA is not afraid for new functional multiple use parts. Imagine the Unimog with a new steering hub......

yeah, this part is not solid

This steering angle is a joke, but i can accept why they did it. It is pretty solid.

Probably the werent sold good enough. The sets iam actually working on will running better.

Are there no fitting parts or no fitting part in this colour? Maybe a combination with system pieces would work.

It is finally RC, but without tracks. but it need not tracks for what it is built. On june the 13th and 14th is a small convention where the kids can digg with the EC 500.

And the worst is, i can forget a bigscale Unimog as CaDA Set.

To be fair, this axle-pin would be redundant and every part counts when you design a Set. The two Projects iam currently on, i would do many things different when it would be only a Moc.