Jump to content

Bluehose

Eurobricks Citizen
  • Posts

    107
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bluehose

  1. That's pretty good stuff ! The quality of the mocs are way above the quality of the camera ! ^^
  2. Thank you for that ! It's small enough to have a nice housing with few pieces, this is symetrical ans doesn't look expensive !
  3. Outstanding. The ball pin not being extended always had been an upsetting thing for small axles, and you did an very appreciated discovery ! The bodywork is very eye plaisant, do you know how much better does it perform without it's weight to climb rocks ?
  4. Hello, I'm a new father and will definitely will offer this to my daughter's friends with a 42134 lego bodywork for anniversaries !
  5. I don't know if this content is suitable for this subforum of Eurobricks, but look at this scandalous attempt to make people buy the wrong thing for christmas in a Carrefour supermarket in France : https://ibb.co/FnngDmM
  6. Thank you for that, I needed it for a project in the past, I will give it a shot when I will finish the current one.
  7. I liked your pneumatic engine with scotch yoke that could run without inertial wheel. I should combine these two motors, maybe with small cylinders to fit it inside a moc.
  8. Oh, I did not know about that, thank you.
  9. Why would this be a matter ? -#1 classic remote control, channel 1, you use lever right and left for two motors -#2 proportional train remote control, channel 2, you use only the left one for lights -#3 classic remote control, channel 2, you use only the right lever for a motor -Two receptors, channel 1 and 2
  10. It is very beautifull... Impressive.
  11. Thank you ! It's nice, I didn't thought to half beams to have a spacing of an half bush on pins ! It's way more compact than with the Axle and Pin Connector Perpendicular Double Split ( https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=41678&idColor=85#T=P&C=85 ), I thought it was madatory to avoid pin deconnection from the half beam but according your experience there is no need. How big you think the wheels can be before it become an issue ? Is the differential located up the wheels rather between the front and the back axles in order to have a shorter vehicule ? I like your build.
  12. I'd like to see how is the bracing behind the CV joint, attempts are often bulky / prone to clicking (if it's 4x4 I want to manage torque) Glad to see your post.
  13. Sir, that is a good idea. But then we need to make this choice : no off-road performance.
  14. Genius ! I like a lot your front driveline and both suspensions.
  15. I guess you can't with lego motors, they are too big. Use small lego compatible motors.
  16. Awesome ! This beast would be a banger when you have the remote controler in Hans !
  17. Indeed, it's on the naworrer side, did you made this project go on ?
  18. Hello, I know they are multiple clone of Lego technic which steal mocs to make sets, but I heard about one making deals with mocers in order to make sets with their consent. Is this one Cada or it is another one ? Regards
  19. Being 2L wide, it will not look like a gear anymore but it will look a specialised compound piece. It would be a whole new kind of gear and not the bro of the 16t, 20t and 24t clutch gear imo
  20. Indeed but it fall into the new driving ring system category, I May be wrong but I have the feeling this need is something that refrain LEGO to do it because the whole batch is not matching, and I think LEGO is not only about new pieces but they care about coherence (or harmony ?) of the system
  21. Aren't 12 tooth gear to small to use the same clutch gear system, leading to the need of a whole new clutch gear system to coordinate with a 12 tooth clutch gear ?
  22. You can Also use the mechanism used in this video (at 1'55 ) on both the sides of your horizontal and vertical beams.
×
×
  • Create New...