LEGO Star Wars Set Discussion 2026 - READ FIRST POST!!!

[CloneCommando99]

2 hours ago, Lobot said:

All of the new sets are on the LEGO website:

• 75447 Razor Crest - £139.99
• 75445 Anzellan Starship - £64.99
• 75460 New Republic X-Wing Starfighter - £59.99
• 75444 AT-RT Attack £39.99
• 40856 The Mandalorian and Grogu: Allies & Villains - £34.99

The AT-RT seems ridicously overpriced, althought it's one of the better ones.....

It appears Lego’s trying to sneak an additional £5 on the AT RT when the 327th BP was £35. Good thing that I have 0 interest in supporting an overpriced set. Shame, the AT RT driver is quite cool. Maybe a size accurate £10 set would be cool.

What’s interesting about the AT RT is that it’s ostensibly a more up to date version for the Empire. Not just some Clone Wars hardware brought out of retirement because of the remnant’s lack of resources. It’s got a double barrelled forward gun compared to the Republic single barrelled version. And also the rear appears to have exhaust pipes, a feature not present on the republic variant.
 

I am so hoping that there’s some set numbers we don’t know about this summer and not just for the TIE Avenger (Day #294). Lego’s really dropping the ball by not putting an imperial remnant BP on shelves. I mean, look at what hasbro’s cooked up: 

A mix of 1-2 Regular Stormtroopers, Stormtrooper Commander, AT RT Driver and Remnant Snowtroopers would make such a good BP that’s representative of the whole film. Make the build a smaller AT RT and a probe droid or something.

Edited February 13 by CloneCommando99

[ArrowBricks]

2 hours ago, Lobot said:

All of the new sets are on the LEGO website:

• 75447 Razor Crest - £139.99
• 75445 Anzellan Starship - £64.99
• 75460 New Republic X-Wing Starfighter - £59.99
• 75444 AT-RT Attack £39.99
• 40856 The Mandalorian and Grogu: Allies & Villains - £34.99

The AT-RT seems ridicously overpriced, althought it's one of the better ones.....

Thank you for sharing. 

The AT-RT, X-Wing, and RazorCrest are sets I would consider buying. I have not said that in a while. However, the X-Wing is the only set I’d potentially buy day 1.

I’d have loved to experience my childhood of watching a movie and then going to buy the sets. The AT-RT should be £30 and the RazorCrest should be £120, maximum. 

What a shame. 

Edited February 13 by ArrowBricks

[Virginia_Bricks]

The Astromech in the X-Wing does appear to be a new print and not a repeat from the Arc-170. Barely, but a few minor changes.

[Tariq j]

33 minutes ago, ArrowBricks said:

I’d have loved to experience my childhood of watching a movie and then going to buy the sets. The AT-RT should be £30 and the RazorCrest should be £120, maximum. 

What a shame. 

Yeah looking back previous movie tie in waves always had at least one or two cheaply priced sets. Rey’s speeder, the Hovertank from Rogue One, Solo had Han’s Speeder and two battlepacks. Charging £40 for the AT-RT is insane. 

I think it’s a decent wave of sets. I actually quite like the Anzellan starship, being designed for the single piece characters means there’s a well sized interior. That said I do think it’s the weakest move tie in out of the Disney films so far. 

[Virginia_Bricks]

9 minutes ago, Tariq j said:

Yeah looking back previous movie tie in waves always had at least one or two cheaply priced sets. Rey’s speeder, the Hovertank from Rogue One, Solo had Han’s Speeder and two battlepacks. Charging £40 for the AT-RT is insane. 

I think it’s a decent wave of sets. I actually quite like the Anzellan starship, being designed for the single piece characters means there’s a well sized interior. That said I do think it’s the weakest move tie in out of the Disney films so far. 

Hovertank is effectively the same price as the AT-RT once you account for inflation. Same thing with Han's Speeder.

[Zap Rowsdower]

19 hours ago, hvader said:

Wait so who are the “villains” in that “allies and villains” Brickheadz pack?

Is Colonel Ward… evil?

It surely can’t be the little Babu Frik dude

I wouldn't be shocked if Ward turns out to be some sort of twist Villain. She appears to be the Mandalorian's handler and is responsible for assigning his missions. That sets her up pretty well to do some sketchy stuff. 

She's also getting a lot of merchandise. It might be because she's Sigourney Weaver, but it still feels like more than what you'd expect for a non-action character. 

[Mandalorianknight]

8 hours ago, TeddytheSpoon said:

This was my thought too. Blue Squadron lives! And with the sets being released so close to each other, the design language should be pretty similar too. Maybe size discrepancy might be the only issue.

Size Discrepancy is definitely an issue, but it was with the 2016 U-wing as well. It really needs to be at a much larger price point to effectively represent the interior.

12 hours ago, BrickBob Studpants said:

There are two more sets explicitly based on M&G, namely the AT-AT and an unknown $100 set. There could be more since we have two other unknown sets this summer, but these could pretty much be anything  As @Mandalorianknight points out, the Sandcrawler and Imperial Shuttle are based on the show.

We say this until TMAG revives Kuill and sends Mando back to his planet to fight another Mudhorn, before a Gideon clone kidnaps Pershing in an imperial shuttle.

6 hours ago, BrickBob Studpants said:

The mercenary droid seems to sport a cloak and drive a STAP, at least based on other toy leaks. Hopefully he shows up in a set too!  Really cool design.

We've gotten a number of STAPs recently, but they're a good side build, I wouldn't mind another. I'd also be interested in seeing how they represent him- that's a B1 head for sure but his body is bulkier and he's got a cape. So we'd likely get a new molded (mostly) B1 head made to fit on minifigure torsos.

I'm also already seeing people refer to him as "grogu's new mech", which is a hilarious prediction. He is about the right bulkiness for it.

31 minutes ago, CloneCommando99 said:

It appears Lego’s trying to sneak an additional £5 on the AT RT when the 327th BP was £35. Good thing that I have 0 interest in supporting an overpriced set. Shame, the AT RT driver is quite cool. Maybe a size accurate £10 set would be cool.

What’s interesting about the AT RT is that it’s ostensibly a more up to date version for the Empire. Not just some Clone Wars hardware brought out of retirement because of the remnant’s lack of resources. It’s got a double barrelled forward gun compared to the Republic single barrelled version. And also the rear appears to have exhaust pipes, a feature not present on the republic variant.

I am so hoping that there’s some set numbers we don’t know about this summer and not just for the TIE Avenger (Day #294). Lego’s really dropping the ball by not putting an imperial remnant BP on shelves. I mean, look at what hasbro’s cooked up: 

A mix of 1-2 Regular Stormtroopers, Stormtrooper Commander, AT RT Driver and Remnant Snowtroopers would make such a good BP that’s representative of the whole film. Make the build a smaller AT RT and a probe droid or something.

It's crazy enough seeing the 327th pack on shelves for 50% more than the coruscant pack when they're essentially the same thing in terms of value of stuff- seeing the AT-RT, which doesn't even have the battle pack excuse, at MORE than that in the UK (even equivalent in the US) is crazy.

It's possible that it's simply modified due to it's age, but there's no getting around the fact that they've strapped a V6 to this thing. I'm sure the more likely option is that it is a variant or new model like you said, but I do love the idea of Mando stealing some poor sap's passion project.

7 minutes ago, Virginia_Bricks said:

The Astromech in the X-Wing does appear to be a new print and not a repeat from the Arc-170. Barely, but a few minor changes.

Which implies it might legitimately be just a very similar droid in-universe rather than lego re-using prints (Which makes sense- lego doesn't usually cheap out in terms of star wars re-uses).

[Mandalorianknight]

59 minutes ago, Tariq j said:

Yeah looking back previous movie tie in waves always had at least one or two cheaply priced sets. Rey’s speeder, the Hovertank from Rogue One, Solo had Han’s Speeder and two battlepacks. Charging £40 for the AT-RT is insane. 

I think it’s a decent wave of sets. I actually quite like the Anzellan starship, being designed for the single piece characters means there’s a well sized interior. That said I do think it’s the weakest move tie in out of the Disney films so far. 

I really think they could have made this set $15 with just a smaller AT-RT, Mando, and Grogu, but if they were worried about the set conflicting with his speeder, why not just make the set $30 and downsize one or both of the builds a bit (or keep everything the same- even in 2026 that's a $30 set).

21 minutes ago, Zap Rowsdower said:

I wouldn't be shocked if Ward turns out to be some sort of twist Villain. She appears to be the Mandalorian's handler and is responsible for assigning his missions. That sets her up pretty well to do some sketchy stuff. 

She's also getting a lot of merchandise. It might be because she's Sigourney Weaver, but it still feels like more than what you'd expect for a non-action character. 

If the movie can pull off a twist like that, I'd greatly appreciate it. We STILL don't know who the villain is, and I would hope they wouldn't hold back someone generic. Now my personal hope is that the villain is Gideon, but I wouldn't mind Thrawn (So long as the movie would end with him winning in some way, even if Mando and Grogu get a personal victory)... or Ward.

48 minutes ago, Virginia_Bricks said:

Hovertank is effectively the same price as the AT-RT once you account for inflation. Same thing with Han's Speeder.

They're close, but not quite that bad- the Hovertank would be $40 and Han's speeder would be under that. More to the point, the Hovertank was seen as good value even back in 2016, whereas the AT-RT is 100 pieces less for more money even after we account for inflation.

 

Edited February 13 by Mandalorianknight
Sorry for double post, thought the replies would merge.

[hvader]

All this secrecy only for the villain to be Gideon yet again would be epicly hilarious

Edited February 13 by hvader

[BrickBob Studpants]

Gideon coming back makes no sense to me for two reasons:

• Cloning doesn’t work like that in SW  There is no memory implanting, and I prefer it that way. It works in Dune, but doesn’t fit here in my opinion as it contradicts AotC and TBB. If the Gideon that died in S3 was a clone, why did he pretend to be the real one? It’s not like he expected to lose here  Palpatine with his contingency plans he ain’t. So was the real one teaching the clone everyone’s names and the significance of the Darksaber and stuff? That’s just dumb.
• That would be a confusing plot point for moviegoers. A lot of people will watch this movie without ever having seen the show, so the smart thing to do is to have a stand-alone story that while still tying in with what came before of course, makes it accessible to everyone.

Edited February 14 by BrickBob Studpants

[Mandalorianknight]

5 hours ago, hvader said:

All this secrecy only for the villain to be Gideon yet again would be epicly hilarious

And given we think he's dead, it would be a reason to hide it.

3 hours ago, BrickBob Studpants said:

Gideon coming back makes no sense to me for two reasons:

• Cloning doesn’t work like that in SW  There is no memory implanting, and I prefer it that way. It works in Dune, but doesn’t fit here in my opinion as it contradicts AotC and TBB. If the Gideon that died in S3 was a clone, why did he pretend to be the real one? It’s not like he expected to lose here  Palpatine with his contingency plans he ain’t. So was the real one teaching the clone everyone’s names and the significance of the Darksaber and stuff? That’s just dumb.
• That would be a confusing plot point for moviegoers. A lot of people will watch this movie without ever having seen the show, so the smart thing to do is to have a stand-alone story that while still tying in with what came before of course, makes it accessible to everyone.

Is all that difficult to believe that someone- wouldn't have to be gideon- was around to explain the basics- or that he had access to Gideon's files? I don't think it's very dumb. (Plus, this is already a different type of cloning than we're used to- they're cloning the Gideons fully grown like Spaarti cloning from legends rather than the "clone an infant and it ages twice as fast to adulthood" method we've seen before- so maybe they do have a memory upload.) As for why he'd pretend to be the real Gideon, I don't know, but they built the guy up to be a master planner/long game type of villain. Maybe he wants the republic to think he's dead.

Aside from the Mandoverse being Star Wars's MCU, and the MCU having a habit of assuming you've watched related content, I really don't think it'd be all that difficult of a concept to grasp for anyone who hasn't watched the show. You just have Gideon show up, mando is shocked and says "But we killed you!" or something, and the GA understands "Ok, this imperial has history with mando and somehow faked his death". Not to mention that star wars has dropped returning "dead" villains in with less setup in the past, and that the first time Trench shows up in Clone Wars the republic is surprised because they thought he was dead from some offscreen battle a decade earlier.

 

I'm not saying it's particularly likely- the biggest hole in the theory IMO is that it would be shocking if they managed to hide Giancarlo Esposito's involvement this well- but I don't think it's dumb or anything. Though I think the most likely option at this point is either @Zap Rowsdower's Ward theory or just that there isn't a main villain because it's three episodes of the show stitched together.

[Zap Rowsdower]

Everyone's favorite character, Unidentified Imperial warlord (commander), will be in the movie according to Deadline.

I expect he'll be a minor character who gets dealt with within the first thirty minutes of the movie, but it does suggest the Imperial Shadow Council will play some role in the story. 

However, it would be nice to give the actor a more prominent part (and name) and see some new imperial Villains. In the EU, there were a lot of noteworthy warlords around this time (Kaine, Zsinj, Teradoc, Delvardus, Harrsk, and others). I'd like to learn more about each Shadow Council member's individual quirks. 

Edited February 14 by Zap Rowsdower

[MKJoshA]

As the majority of the Star Wars fans read this thread I'm going to ask here that you all take a look at this post and give your feedback. Thanks.

[CloneCommando99]

It’s Valentine’s Day. But who needs a valentine when you have the glorious purpose of the TIE Avenger?

Happy Varian’s TIE day everyone. (#295 of the TIE Avenger festivities)

 

I swear. If a imperial remnant BP becomes like the TIE Avenger I’m gonna lose it.

9 hours ago, BrickBob Studpants said:

Gideon coming back makes no sense to me for two reasons:

• Cloning doesn’t work like that in SW  There is no memory implanting, and I prefer it that way. It works in Dune, but doesn’t fit here in my opinion as it contradicts AotC and TBB. If the Gideon that died in S3 was a clone, why did he pretend to be the real one? It’s not like he expected to lose here  Palpatine with his contingency plans he ain’t. So was the real one teaching the clone everyone’s names and the significance of the Darksaber and stuff? That’s just dumb.
• That would be a confusing plot point for moviegoers. A lot of people will watch this movie without ever having seen the show, so the smart thing to do is to have a stand-alone story that while still tying in with what came before of course, makes it accessible to everyone.

Or it was a clone that died? There’s no way someone would shave off such an elegant stache voluntarily. /s

6 hours ago, Mandalorianknight said:

Is all that difficult to believe that someone- wouldn't have to be gideon- was around to explain the basics- or that he had access to Gideon's files? I don't think it's very dumb. (Plus, this is already a different type of cloning than we're used to- they're cloning the Gideons fully grown like Spaarti cloning from legends rather than the "clone an infant and it ages twice as fast to adulthood" method we've seen before- so maybe they do have a memory upload.) As for why he'd pretend to be the real Gideon, I don't know, but they built the guy up to be a master planner/long game type of villain. Maybe he wants the republic to think he's dead.

11 hours ago, hvader said:

All this secrecy only for the villain to be Gideon yet again would be epicly hilarious

13 hours ago, Mandalorianknight said:

If the movie can pull off a twist like that, I'd greatly appreciate it. We STILL don't know who the villain is, and I would hope they wouldn't hold back someone generic. Now my personal hope is that the villain is Gideon, but I wouldn't mind Thrawn (So long as the movie would end with him winning in some way, even if Mando and Grogu get a personal victory)... or Ward.

Climax of the movie, Unidentified Imperial Warlord is running from Mando to the hangar. When they reach the hangar, Ward is waiting at the foot of a shuttle’s boarding ramp holding up a blaster. Mando is suddenly trapped in a ray shield.

Mando: “Ward, kill him or he’ll get away!”

Ward: “I can't allow you to kill Unidentified Imperial Warlord. However, I am not completely unsympathetic to your sense of duty. You hurt Unidentified Imperial Warlord when you robbed that AT RT. You hurt his Remnant, his pride. Quite effectively. And if you were to hurt him in the same manner again, I would not stand in your way."

Mando: “Why are you doing this?”

Ward: “It's not in my interests for Unidentified Imperial Warlord to die... at this time. I decide what he deserves. No one else.”

Ward proceeds to rip off her face and reveal that she was Gideon all along.

Mando: “What? How? I killed you! But didn’t we…”

Gideon nods

Mando: “This is not the way!”

 

There I predicted it.

Edited February 14 by CloneCommando99

[Llewop]

15 hours ago, ArrowBricks said:

Thank you for sharing. 

The AT-RT, X-Wing, and RazorCrest are sets I would consider buying. I have not said that in a while. However, the X-Wing is the only set I’d potentially buy day 1.

I’d have loved to experience my childhood of watching a movie and then going to buy the sets. The AT-RT should be £30 and the RazorCrest should be £120, maximum. 

What a shame. 

It was pretty epic I remember watching AoTC and then getting the Jedi starfighter, the tusken raider set, and Yoda Dooku dua shortly after. 
not SW related but was also lucky to get the entire chamber of secrets wave when that first came out as well. 

your right it is a shame kids can’t enjoy it the same way 

[Lobot]

It looks like LEGO have another contender for the most overpriced set of 2026...

75446 Grogu (Mandalorian Apprentice) for £119.99!!

It's only slightly larger than the previous version (+127 parts) - how can they possibly justify that price point? 

[Virginia_Bricks]

1 hour ago, Lobot said:

It looks like LEGO have another contender for the most overpriced set of 2026...

75446 Grogu (Mandalorian Apprentice) for £119.99!!

It's only slightly larger than the previous version (+127 parts) - how can they possibly justify that price point? 

Its roughly $15 USD more expensive than the previous one when accounting for inflation, so 127 parts for $15 more dollars seems pretty fair to me. Especially with a big old printed piece that has no other use than in this set.

Lego Star Wars pricing in 2026 so far has been pretty reasonable (excluding Smart Brick sets).

Cobb Vanth's speeder might have the worst price per piece, but most of that price probably came from the two minifigures in it.

[ArrowBricks]

9 hours ago, Llewop said:

your right it is a shame kids can’t enjoy it the same way 

The Brickheadz pack as the most affordable set sums it up. It’s such a shame. 

[CloneCommando99]

12 hours ago, Virginia_Bricks said:

 

Lego Star Wars pricing in 2026 so far has been pretty reasonable (excluding Smart Brick sets).

Cobb Vanth's speeder might have the worst price per piece, but most of that price probably came from the two minifigures in it.

You have seen the AT RT right? And the Razor Crest to a slightly lesser extent?

 

Just the AT AT and Shuttle reveals which i’m invested in now. But I am so hoping for there to still be 2-5 unknown set numbers for this year because:

1. Shockingly, I want a TIE Avenger (#296) and/or Remnant Battlepack.
2. It’d be a shame if Smart Play ment we lost a 1/3 of sets we could have gotten this year.
3. Clone bros are going to throw a tantrum if they don’t get Wolfpack this year despite all the YouTubers saying it was likely. 

I also feel like there are some numbers we don’t know. As some of the 2026/7 list will supposedly release this year.

[BrickBob Studpants]

6 minutes ago, CloneCommando99 said:

As some of the 2026/7 list will supposedly release this year.

The same source that reported Carson Teva being included in the X-Wing said that the upscaled Vader minifig was coming this year. I dismissed the source then (Jedibricks I think), but now it could be true after all!

I think the remaining two sets (Vader and the alleged Shadow Lord set) are it for this year.

[Kaijumeister]

2 hours ago, CloneCommando99 said:

Just the AT AT and Shuttle reveals which i’m invested in now. But I am so hoping for there to still be 2-5 unknown set numbers for this year because:

1. Shockingly, I want a TIE Avenger (#296) and/or Remnant Battlepack.
2. It’d be a shame if Smart Play ment we lost a 1/3 of sets we could have gotten this year.
3. Clone bros are going to throw a tantrum if they don’t get Wolfpack this year despite all the YouTubers saying it was likely. 

I also feel like there are some numbers we don’t know. As some of the 2026/7 list will supposedly release this year.

Agree on all counts here. If there aren’t any more system-scaled sets on the way this year, that just means that my only purchases for 2026 will be Cobb’s Speeder, the AT-AT, Sandcrawler, and Imperial Shuttle (assuming any of the unrevealed sets are good in the first place). Plus potentially whatever the $100 TMaG and Maul: Shadow Lord sets will be too. I don’t think I’ve planned to buy this few Star Wars sets from a year’s lineup in quite some time.

@BrickBob Studpants Unfortunately I’m starting to agree with you that this is it for the year. Otherwise there wouldn’t be so much ambiguity over what’s coming in the summer. Still, would have liked to see Anakin’s Delta-7b this year at the very least if only because it’s actually at a lower price point than everything else.

Between the Smart Brick and TMaG / Mandalorian sets dominating the 2026 lineup, all of the revealed sets thus far have marked 2026 as one of the theme’s weakest years since 2019 IMO. I really want to like what we’ve seen of TMaG but everything just seems quite boring and repetitive to me so far, although the X-Wing does look good. I’m hoping that the unrevealed TMaG sets and Maul set are at least interesting.

[Llewop]

7 hours ago, Kaijumeister said:

Agree on all counts here. If there aren’t any more system-scaled sets on the way this year, that just means that my only purchases for 2026 will be Cobb’s Speeder, the AT-AT, Sandcrawler, and Imperial Shuttle (assuming any of the unrevealed sets are good in the first place). Plus potentially whatever the $100 TMaG and Maul: Shadow Lord sets will be too. I don’t think I’ve planned to buy this few Star Wars sets from a year’s lineup in quite some time.

@BrickBob Studpants Unfortunately I’m starting to agree with you that this is it for the year. Otherwise there wouldn’t be so much ambiguity over what’s coming in the summer. Still, would have liked to see Anakin’s Delta-7b this year at the very least if only because it’s actually at a lower price point than everything else.

Between the Smart Brick and TMaG / Mandalorian sets dominating the 2026 lineup, all of the revealed sets thus far have marked 2026 as one of the theme’s weakest years since 2019 IMO. I really want to like what we’ve seen of TMaG but everything just seems quite boring and repetitive to me so far, although the X-Wing does look good. I’m hoping that the unrevealed TMaG sets and Maul set are at least interesting.

There’s got to be more sets. There are only 2 clones been released this year it’s like Lego doesn’t even care about clone fans anymore…. 

[BrickBob Studpants]

Let's break it down, shall we...

• 2020: 1 polybag, 2 GWP sets, 3 microfighters, 2 battlepacks, 1 4+ set, 8 display sets, 14 playsets, 1 AC, total of 32 sets.
• 2021: 1 polybag, 2 GWP sets, 2 microfighters, 0 battlepacks, 1 4+ set, 7 display sets, 11 playsets, 1 AC, total of 25 sets.
• 2022: 2 polybags, 1 GWP set, 2 accessory packs, 1 microfighter, 1 battlepack, 1 4+ set, 9 display sets, 11 playsets, 1 AC, total of 29 sets.
• 2023: 1 polybag, 2 GWP sets, 2 microfighters, 2 battlepacks, 3 mechs, 1 4+ set, 9 display sets, 10 playsets, 1 AC, total of 31 sets.
• 2024: 2 polybags, 2 GWP sets, 1 microfighter, 2 battlepacks, 1 mech, 1 4+ set, 10 display sets, 12 playsets, 1 AC, total of 32 sets.
• 2025: 1 polybag, 2 GWP sets, 1 microfighter, 2 battlepacks, 1 mech, 1 4+ set, 16 display sets, 8 playsets, 1 AC, total of 33 sets.
• 2026: 2 polybags, 1 GWP set, 0 microfighters, 1 battlepack, 1 mech, 1 4+ set, 9 display sets, 10 playsets, 8 Smart Play sets, 2 unknowns, 1 AC, total of 36 sets.

Umm, yeah. Even if the list is already complete, this is the largest number of sets we've had in years. And you guys expect more??

[Meaf]

56 minutes ago, BrickBob Studpants said:

Let's break it down, shall we...

• 2020: 1 polybag, 2 GWP sets, 3 microfighters, 2 battlepacks, 1 4+ set, 8 display sets, 14 playsets, 1 AC, total of 32 sets.
• 2021: 1 polybag, 2 GWP sets, 2 microfighters, 0 battlepacks, 1 4+ set, 7 display sets, 11 playsets, 1 AC, total of 25 sets.
• 2022: 2 polybags, 1 GWP set, 2 accessory packs, 1 microfighter, 1 battlepack, 1 4+ set, 9 display sets, 11 playsets, 1 AC, total of 29 sets.
• 2023: 1 polybag, 2 GWP sets, 2 microfighters, 2 battlepacks, 3 mechs, 1 4+ set, 9 display sets, 10 playsets, 1 AC, total of 31 sets.
• 2024: 2 polybags, 2 GWP sets, 1 microfighter, 2 battlepacks, 1 mech, 1 4+ set, 10 display sets, 12 playsets, 1 AC, total of 32 sets.
• 2025: 1 polybag, 2 GWP sets, 1 microfighter, 2 battlepacks, 1 mech, 1 4+ set, 16 display sets, 8 playsets, 1 AC, total of 33 sets.
• 2026: 2 polybags, 1 GWP set, 0 microfighters, 1 battlepack, 1 mech, 1 4+ set, 9 display sets, 10 playsets, 8 Smart Play sets, 2 unknowns, 1 AC, total of 36 sets.

Umm, yeah. Even if the list is already complete, this is the largest number of sets we've had in years. And you guys expect more??

I think the smart brick stuff taking up so much of the list is what makes it feel like we're getting less than in the past, but yeah, I don't know how much more we can reasonably expect at this point. The only thing that comes to mind is maybe stuff for Ahsoka season 2 if that's happening this year (I don't follow this stuff enough to know if there are any leaks indicating whether that's the case), and even that could be as little as one additional set.

[Darth_Bane13]

9 hours ago, Kaijumeister said:

Between the Smart Brick and TMaG / Mandalorian sets dominating the 2026 lineup, all of the revealed sets thus far have marked 2026 as one of the theme’s weakest years since 2019 IMO. I really want to like what we’ve seen of TMaG but everything just seems quite boring and repetitive to me so far, although the X-Wing does look good. I’m hoping that the unrevealed TMaG sets and Maul set are at least interesting.

More like weakest year since last year.