Jump to content

[Review] 4482 AT-TE

  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

Poll: Rate the set (36 member(s) have cast votes)

Vote your opinion

  1. Poor (2 votes [5.56%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.56%

  2. Below Average (5 votes [13.89%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.89%

  3. Average (7 votes [19.44%])

    Percentage of vote: 19.44%

  4. Above Average (16 votes [44.44%])

    Percentage of vote: 44.44%

  5. Outstanding (6 votes [16.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.67%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#26 Brickdoctor


  • Look at my Post Count!

    Posts: 21829
    Joined: 06-June 10
    Member: 11254
    Country: California, USA

Posted 21 July 2011 - 08:36 PM

View Postfallenangel309, on 21 July 2011 - 08:28 PM, said:

Same here, until I saw the gallery. :blush: Apparently, Attack of the Clones used a lot more studio models than one would have expected it to.
I think those were mockups that the sculptors made before they were modeled in CGI. But I'm not sure.

#27 wokajablocka


    Posts: 812
    Joined: 27-August 10
    Member: 12884
    Country: Australia

Posted 22 July 2011 - 05:50 AM

View PostRoncanator, on 31 July 2009 - 03:19 AM, said:

its a good set for its time but the newer one looks a lot better. I do have a problem with all the random colours that really annoys me. Its dumb that it didnt come with any exclusives minifigs.

Great review for an average set IMO

Although it didn't had exculsive minifigs you can only get the open visor version of clone with this set and 7163 Republic Gunship which makes it a pritty rare fig. How many standard clone do we all own :hmpf: . I missed out on these sets so they are quite desirable to me.

Great first time review.

IMO the newer vesion is way better with colours, functions and figures.

Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image

May the Brick be with you!

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users