-
Posts
1,854 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Peanuts
-
Nevermind. Sorry if I sounded harsh or something.
-
Actually, I never said I want to stamp out the scum. Dad said this. Not that I wouldn't want to, but I didn't say so. I said, that I couldn't believe there was traitorous scum and so on... And as I already said (about a thousand times) Uncle Quentoin had mentioned it long before First post of the sign up thread, to be exactly. No.
-
Once again the editing Word change. As I said before, it were two spelling errors, which I noticed shortly after I had written spoken. Honestly, what exactly do you think I could have written said? "Oh, btw, it's great to be scum for the first time?" Not to mention this is playing the game outside the playing thread/metagaming/whatever else. And why do you think I was a lynchee (not lyncher )? Come to think, you're talking about the jester. Lyncher and lynchee are something completely different.
-
Why was my defense weak? And how is a defense supposed to be stronger than the accusation? And yes, I edited my post changed my words, but it was no second after I wrote it and it was only because there were two spelling misktakes in it, which I use to correct, if it's not forbidden. What can be true? That I said there was scum? Yes, that's true. That the host Quentin didn't mention is before? No, that's evidently wrong. That I'm scum? Maybe, as well as everyone of us. I might be, as might everyone be. What exactly are you trying to tell?
-
Nothing, I suppose. But to me it's just logical that somebody who talks a lot, accuses people and brings up good ideas is more likely to be valuable than somebody who just comes out for defending themselves. Sorry, but somebone of use will die today and we have to make a decision.
-
That's what we do anyway, by discussing our suspects. The investigator(s) would be very stupid not to go for the ones we consider untrustworthy. I was just talking about Richelle's suggestion about determining in public who to investigate. And as I said before, we should add Amy to the list, just in account of completeness.
-
Well, I also think that we should discuss about suspects a bit before just voting out somebody of a list of four people, which even is incomplete IMO. It's perfectly true Richele didn't contribute much today, but Rupert didn't say anything either (except that he prefers stupid bricks over fabulous guns ), so that would be the same case. Dragana ad Irena, the other two on Fuchsia's list, are as suspect to me as them, because of the obvious reasons. I don't think the investigators should reveal themselves either, unless of course they have information they need to share. We can also discuss who to investigate in public without them revealed, but I don't think this is a good idea either, because the scum might just frame the one we choose to investigate, if they got framer, or kill the very same person, as we would certainly not protect the investigatee. And we shouldn't forget it is still dangerous if the investigators claim their role publicly, even if they are protected, because, if two or more investigators speak up, and we have two protectors, they couldn't protect someone else, so that save for the investigators and a possible paranoid gun owner every twonie else would be vulnerable.
-
Well, I myself wouldn't say Henry was scum either, just because he's accusing me. After all, it would be a rather bad tactic to vote for those who accuse others (even if their accusation is pointless), as accusing is the only thing we yet can do to gain information. And I must admit that we have to vote for someone at the end of the day, but I concede to Dad, that we should have an eye on those who said few or nothing. What about Amy? I haven't got the impression she's said anything of importance today.
-
The first one was brilliant compilation of small things, the second was about the ultimate groaner, I guess. You could even have mentioned the cape in the Boba Fett one. I suppose it's about the wookie scalp Boba Fett's wearing in his new version.
-
And as I said before: It had been mentioned before the Confirmation Thread Family Reunion speach, but already in the sign up thread when we arrived here. You know, I'm just chatting. Yet I'm not suspicious of Henry at all, despite his chocalate face and his talking about babies. I think he didn't mean that I can't scum because I've said I'd like to kill the scum, he meant that following your theory Dad should be as suspicious, as he talked about the scum even before I did. And do you really believe any half-way intelligent scum would give themselves away by defending their member against such weak accusations? Would make it rather easy for us to get them, don't you think? That's the video games' fault, not mine!
-
Why me again? You, Sir, are the chocalate pie-faced stalking weirdo, not me. And what makes you believe I was a killer? My lovely blonde hair? My decorative pink headband? My cute Gatling gun? That's preposterous!
-
I don't think this would be a good idea, as we won't know who the scum will attack at night. If they knew all our night actions, they'd have good odds to get somebody with an important role unprotected, considering we got one or two protectors. Or they can take on the protectors, as they themselves have lower chances to be protected or even aim for vanillas, as they are certain to be vulnerable. I think the second option is the best one, as it is less likely to overburden our protectors, but still might provide us some info.
-
Oh no, those bastards will try to murder us and, even more vitally, take Uncle Quentin's money! Why our amicable family? We've never hurt anyone...who'd be important. Oh, I'm so upset, help me, Mummy!
-
Belville Mafia: confirmation/discussion
Peanuts replied to Quarryman's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
She's a communist spy! It's our capitalists' duty to kill her immediately! -
The Coming Darkness - Sign up thread
Peanuts replied to def's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
Sounds interesting, but I feel like this is intended for those who aren't playing in the current mafia game. Also I'm not that much of a fan of the fantasy theme, so I'm just going to watch this. Good luck to you all! -
I like the color choice a lot, fits him rather good. But I'm not satisfied with his cape, the hood makes him look like a Sith Lord. Still I like what they did on him.
-
Belville Mafia: confirmation/discussion
Peanuts replied to Quarryman's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
Mom, Dad, my cousin's picking on me and making jokes and stalking! -
Belville Mafia: confirmation/discussion
Peanuts replied to Quarryman's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
Oh. Er...I knew that? -
Belville Mafia: confirmation/discussion
Peanuts replied to Quarryman's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
Okay, that's ridiculous. 1)It was said in the sign up thread there are loyals and not loyals. 2)This is a mafia game. If there was no scum (and this isn't WHM), why would we playing? -
Belville Mafia: confirmation/discussion
Peanuts replied to Quarryman's topic in LEGO Mafia and Role-Play Games
Petra's here! I can't believe this traitorous scum which is threatening our peaceful family life. And I already thought I'd never get a chance to play with my cute minigun. -
Seems like there's a new video up. It contains still just the first twelve minutes of the game, which are already known, but this time Batman saves Jack Rhyder from some thugs, which is new, isn't it?
-
Hmm, I would wouldn't have surrendered without some Third Man-like chase scene, but well... It's interesting how much emotions you can convey in a small vig. You can practically feel the desperation. It's not quite the ending I exspected, but I like it a lot. I just wonder why they build a manhole on the mid of a street. Oh, and the water looks really dirty, with the green plate under the trans blue tiles. Nicely done.
-
Congrats to the winners, it was well-deserved. I wish I had participated at the contest and the voting, I guess I procrastinated it too often. Anyway, you did really well! Great builds and customs I've seen there.
-
I myself haven't ever done a brickfilm, so I'm no expert about them, but the I like the fact it's very fluent. Also the content is quite funny and the sounds fit well into the situations and are a great additition. My personal favourite test was the katana cut. So, overall, well done. Keep up brick-flicking!
-
Good sequel, I really like how the lamp was done. And as everyone else said before, the gloves are nice small detail. I also liked your first vignette, especially the ventilation shaft was well done. I'm excited what the final part will bring!