Peanuts

No it doesn't, as it merges automatically. That's why merging is allowed, while editing isn't.

Okay, so we are allowed to vote. As I said before, I vote: Simon the Pieman (Scorpiox).

Alright, let's try to keep up with everything that has been said while I was researching the effect of fear gas on waitresses: Great. So why exactly are you suspicious of me? Because of my doubts? I'm sorry, but I'm a scientist. I tend to scrutinize what people say. And all day is ot quite true. I'd agree with a third of the day, maybe even up to a half, I don't know the exact fraction, but that's pointless splitting hairs. The point is, I went with you even before you verified Clayface's claim. You hadn't already "put your very reputation in". And I've got a night action which is not very useful for the criminals. Point being? We can't all be investigators, role cops, watchers, trackers and protectors. That would be a bit unfair towards the agents, wouldn't it? And my action is not that scum-like either. Sure, it's likely to harm the town. What about vigilantes, blockers and bus drivers? They aren't much more useful for the town than me. Okay, so you've got a fair accusation with a night action result to back it up. That's what I call substantial evidence. Unsubstantial evidence is evidence based peoples' reactions and speeches, because there are many cases of criminals or townies in previous situations acting slightly scummy, which has often led to convictions of innoncent people. Almost every harmful action could derail the criminals' plans. It's similar with blockers and killers, just save for the confusion part. On the other hand, they could also be used against the agents, causing confusion amongst them. It's by far not as scummy as you pretend. And I'm showing my true colors because I'm still doubting Creeper? I never said I didn't trust him, but we have to keep in mind back then there was no substantial evidence I knew of. So please excuse me for not blindly following his suspects. And to me it's obvious he can't be always right, now that you consider me as solid lead. But I'm aware you can't know that, and I really hope you won't get to know just because the Joker dissected me with a crowbar. But I must admit he's got a point. An inventor working for the criminals who only produces blockings? That's ridiculous. And the Mad Hatter's result doesn't say anything about inventor. And it's now confirmed he really has the role cop. Now that's real evidence. I'm going to vote for you, too.

Now that's good news, it's good to hear Creeper and Clayface were right. And the scummy assassin got what he deserved for killing our investigator. What kind of villain keeps a diary anyway? And Wesker, too. Well, it's good to see our vigilante has managed to kill him after we were fairly certain he's scum. Saves us today for somebody else to lynch. But if I'm not mistaking, we now have used every substantial evidence we had. But at least the Creeper seemed to have unproven suspicions, though. I'm not convinced, but if nothing else comes up, I wouldn't mind if we risked to lose an unhelpful criminal. There's still good chance they are scum. Ra's and the Mad Hatter are on top of the list of people I wouldn't mourn too much, I don't remember them being helpful (or even outspoken) just once.

I'd like to check if there is anything in teh toilet or in the water tank.

I'll examine the mirror, then. You folks have problems...and I thought my family was strange No offence, Dad.

I'm glad to hear that. I'm also glad you're alright, you were awfully close to that explosion.

And I'd like to search any drawers which might be in the Bedroom. Ha! The early bird catches the worm. Oh, and there are two more dead. Damn, we're dropping like flies. Dad, I suggest you stay awake tonight and make dure nobody sets fire on our house.

So pretty much everything is settled, huh? So I've got plenty of time to go on with my journal.

It happens the discussion has slowed down, so please excuse me, I have to go on with my journal. But they wouldn't redirect a random night action to one of their own, that's (4). Much too risky, with blockers and investigators and whatnot.

Nah, they don't give tags like that. But it's still worth a title. Although, now that I've said it you won't get one anymore.

That's why I'm sure you're also scum in case Deadshot is scum: (1)[Your Claim] You're a protector. (2)[Your Claim] You tried to protect Baby Doll on day 1 but you've been redirected to Deadshot. (3)[Premise] Deadshot is an agent. (4)[Logic] The agents wouldn't redirect a criminal who's role they don't know to one of their own. (5)[Logic] They can't have known of your night action, as it was Day 1. (6)[Logic] Any criminal redirecter who redirected you would approach one of the practically confirmed criminals such as Baby Doll and the Creeper as soon as you state you've been redirected, unless they are hindered. (7)[Obvious fact] The only thing that can hinder them is death or conversion. (8)[Assumtion] The scum hasn't converted the one person who redirected you on day one, because that would be highly unlikely. (9)[Obvious fact] No criminal died before he could prove (2). (10)[Obvious fact] No criminal proved (2), otherwise we would have learned. Logical Conclusion: Your claim is wrong. Yes, that's right. Fortuantely we don't need to test you anymore. If Deadshot is an agent, I'll vote for you.

Actually, he shouldn't have given the hint in the first place, so I wouldn't have bothered him. But of course, revealing his night action was stupid as well. I had already voted for Deadshot, and I think the Creeper confirming Clayface has settled it, as Deadshot being a criminal equals Clayface and Creeper being agents, which would be a disproportional sacrifice for the agents.

Thanks, that's what I wanted to hear. I've already voted for Deadshot, but if I hadn't I'd do so right now. Oh, and I'm still wondering: Why didn't Clayface copy the action of the Riddler? In retroperspective it's good he didn't, but why not?

I admit, he being converted on night 1 and Ventriloquist being an agent don't go with each other. But as I said before, this is only based on the assumption Deadshot is a scum killer. If he is, we can safely assume Wesker is an agent and the Creeper hasn't been converted so far. If he isn't, we can safely assume Clayface is an agent. For that reason, I'll vote: Deadshot (Rumble Strike). I might change my mind once we hear from the Creeper, the Ventriloquist, Deadshot or somebody else who can add something conclusive or convincing or somehwo forthbringing to this matter. Of course, none of us can be sure about anything. I'm not convinced either. But it's important that we think, dispute and point out evidence or flaws, just like we do, instead of simply saying "A has a good case against B, so I'm voting for B." Has anyone realized Mad Hatter has never answered this, albeit being asked twice? Now that's what I call an unhelpful criminal...or an agent.

That's a good point indeed. Of course the Creeper wouldn't change his opinion about the Ventriloquist after he's been converted, that would only make his conversion obvious. I'm not saying he was converted, though. I don't think he was, and if he says Clayface told him he'd copy Deadshot's ability at Calendar Man, I'll vote for Deadshot immediately. Excuse me, I meant night one. I'm sorry for that (no sarcasm) and I hope you bear in mind it might happen again, that I say day while I mean night, especially with night actions.

If Deadshot is town, this whole thing is no coincidence, it's tactics. And I never said the case wasn't strong enough. I can understand everyone who votes for Deadshot, as his case is strong. I'm just trying to point out flaws. And I will always consider there's a possibility the claimed investigator lied, even before I get the result of the lynch. I also never 100% believed the Riddler, until he died. But you're right, I completely forgot, that if this is really a scum plot, the Creeper must be involved, if they planned to copy Deadshot together, targetting Calendar Man. This was never confirmed though, and Creeper said before some of his team were acting like Cowboys not working together. Could the Creeper please confirm it was planned before that Calendar Man would be targeted? Of course a day kill is not much different from a night kill, that would be a pointless argument more fit of some of you others. But this argument of yours is entirely based on the assumption Deadshot is a scum killer, which is an assumtion, even though a likely one. Also, they can have recruited the Creeper on day one, can't they? Use your head! Maybe they were trying to do both killing and recruiting? Because both killing and recruiting is better than only killing, at least for the agents.

Well, one of them is lying. I have no idea who, though. Two errors: 1. His roleclaim may be "backed up" by the Creeper, but how would the Creeper know Clayface's role? Either it's because he's got some night action result, which I doubt, or they're both agents, which I doubt, or the Creeper is simply refering to a previous roleclaim Clayface did in private to the Creeper, which I believe and which makes all evidence in this null and void. I'd be happy about a confirmation of one of those abilities, though. 2. The Creeper isn't really confirmed, forgot about possible conversions? I'm not trying to create paranoia, I'm simply remembering you of a fact you seem to be happy to forget. What means Deadshot killed the Riddler? Because Clayface said so? He can lie! Whoever killed the Riddler is an agent, but how do you know Deadshot killed the Riddler?

Oh. And I thought you did so because you are a disoriented psychopath. Are you sure you are no disoriented psychopath? Because I tend to be right after all in matters regarding the human psyche. That reminds me, I still have to write my journal. I'll do so once this discussion slows down, right now I think I'm needed. You criminals are doomed without me. Of course you are insane, but don't worry, Doctor Crane knows how to help you. First you have to inhale the gas I'll give you, please take a deep breath...

I think you misunderstand the concept of metagaming however I paraphrase metagaming, it's voting based on something that's not part of teh game, like the outer appearance, their actions in previous games situations like this, or something they said in the discussion thread in a parallel dimension. This is not metagaming however I'll paraphrase metagaming.

And that's actually a pretty good idea. Why kill a possible vigilante? If Deadshot's scum, the Ventriloquist is also scum. So if we kill the Ventriloquist and he turns out as criminal, we should propably think aagin about killing Deadshot. My question exactly.

How comes are you metagaming voting like whatever? Aren't you voting for Deadshot because you believe in his guilt based on the claims that were made before?

And how would Baby Doll know that the vigilante was actually a vigilante and not a neutral SK? Not that I don't trust her, or at least trust her far more than everyone else, but how would she know? 1. How do you know? Besides the fact it's obvious by the claims and actions, how do you know? 2. Why? Where's the logical conclusion there? 3. In fact, it adds up if others were lying. The only question is, who is lying? 4. There are no two vigilantes, that would be silly. But there might be an SK. 5. You didn't answer my question above. Please do so. Well, I can't say you were stupid for voting Deadshot, there's a good case against him, but still, don't forget facts and don't rely on what others say. The agents will lie, and you don't know who the agents are.

The question is, do they have a collective kill? Up to now it didn't look like that, Ra's was certainly not killed by the agents. If Deadshot is true about having shot Calendar Man, and Clayface would have copied that kill, this would imply the agents aren't killing, but only converting. But, if Deadshot is lying and aimed at the Riddler, with Clayface getting rid of Calendar Man, that would imply that the scum isn't converting at all but killing, and that Wesker is either really a paranoid doctor who was redirected at Deadshot, therefore blocking him on day one, or on the same team as Deadshot. But, I'm wondering, if Deadshot is scum, why would the scum redirect a criminal at one of their own? And why would a criminal redirect somebody without telling one of our most trusted criminals? So in case Deadshot is an agent, we can assume the Ventriloquist is an agent. But another strange thing is, Clayface, if you are a criminal and you can copy actions, why didn't you copy the one of the Riddler? Thereby you'd both confirm his action and we get a second investigation. That's the question in which's answer I'm most interested right now.

Right, I forgot about that. That's actually a helpful comment, Croc, well done. Some of you psychopaths astonish me from time to time. I think that seriously puts your credibility in question, Deadshot.